Skip to content

The Intensive Post Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Study

The Intensive Post Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Study (iPENS): A Randomised Trial to Evaluate CD-TREAT Diet as a Food Reintroduction Regime in Children and Young Adults With Crohn's Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04225689
Acronym
iPENS
Enrollment
58
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2020-01-10
Completion date
2024-02-29
Last updated
2020-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease

Keywords

food reintroduction, dietary intervention, dietary triggers, faecal calprotectin, CD-TREAT, Exclusive enteral nutrition

Brief summary

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition with phases where the disease is active and other, where there are no symptoms. Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), a liquid only diet without allowance of any extra food, is the main treatment for children with active CD. However, when children stop the liquid diet and return to their normal diet, most of them will experience an increase in their gut inflammation, mostly without symptoms initially. The aim of this study is to investigate this phenomenon by exploring if diet and gut bacteria play a role. Furthermore, the investigators aim to test whether a new, ordinary food-based diet, called the Crohn's Disease TReatment with EATing (CD-TREAT) diet can help control gut inflammation during the early food reintroduction phase, after EEN completion, compared to an unrestricted, free diet.

Detailed description

A maximum of 60 participants, who have successfully responded to EEN, will be allocated to the study arms with block randomisation, with a 1:1 allocation, in random size blocks. The electronic randomisation process will be performed by an independent researcher. Those participants who do not wish to be randomised to one of the two study arms, will be offered the chance to be allocated to the group of their preference. Using this approach, inclusion of all eligible participants will be ensured, as excluding those who do not wish to be randomised, may reduce the generalisation of findings and minimise statistical power of a study with modest eligible population to recruit from. CD-TREAT diet (intervention group) Participants in the intervention group will consume the CD-TREAT diet exclusively without being allowed to consume additional food, for the first 3 weeks of food reintroduction, after EEN completion. They will be provided with a tailored, dietitian-devised diet, which has been designed to replicate the nutritional composition of EEN. The intervention will be overseen by qualified dietitians, including a National Health Service (NHS) research dietitian. Unrestricted diet (control group) Participants in the control group will consume a free, unrestricted diet for the same period, as the intervention group. Participants in both groups will record their diet on a daily basis. The investigators will meet the participants weekly to address any potential issues they may have during the trial and to review the dietary assessment process. Standard treatment for maintenance of clinical remission will be continued, as designated by the medical team. Participants will be asked to provide serial faecal and urine samples (n=8). Collection of a maximum of 2 blood samples, anthropometric measurements and assessment of disease activity and quality of life will be performed before and after the end of the dietary intervention. Participants will also be followed through their clinical records until they clinically relapse, or maximum up to a year after EEN completion. The primary endpoint is the comparison of faecal calprotectin levels between the two groups at the end of the dietary intervention (3 weeks after EEN completion).

Interventions

OTHERCD-TREAT diet

Dietary intervention

Sponsors

University of Glasgow
CollaboratorOTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Electronic random block-size randomisation will be performed by a researcher not involved in study recruitment. Allocation to study arm will be revealed to participants after provision of informed consent.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Newly diagnosed or relapsing patients with active CD, who have shown clinical improvement by the 4th week of EEN treatment

Exclusion criteria

1. Administration of another induction treatment (e.g. corticosteroids, biologic agents). 2. Lack of clinical improvement with EEN treatment, as assessed by the clinical team. 3. Enrolment in other studies investigating the efficacy of novel therapies for maintenance or induction of remission. 4. Patients or families unable to provide written consent for participation in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Colonic inflammationBaseline to 21 days post EEN completionComparison of faecal calprotectin levels between the intervention (CD-TREAT) and the control (unrestricted diet) group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diet and faecal microbiomeBaseline to 21 days post EEN completionAssociation of fermentable carbohydrates intake with relative abundance of faecal bacteria
Diet and faecal metabolomeBaseline to 21 days post EEN completionAssociation of fermentable carbohydrates intake with concentration of short chain fatty acids in stool
Crohn's Disease activity scoreBaseline to 21 days post EEN completionComparison of weighted Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index score between the two groups (minimum score: 0, maximum: 125). Higher score indicates higher disease activity severity.
Blood inflammatory markersBaseline to 21 days post EEN completionComparison of concentration of blood inflammatory cytokines between the two groups
Quality of lifeBaseline to 21 days post EEN completionComparison of IMPACT III scores between the two groups (minimum score: 35, maximum: 135). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactKonstantinos Gkikas, MSc, Bsc
k.gkikas.1@research.gla.ac.uk07759451611
Backup ContactRichard K Russell, MBChB, MRCP, MRCPCH, PhD
richardrussell@nhs.net01414516543

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026