Skip to content

Improving Attentional and Cognitive Control in the Psychological Treatment of Intrusive Thoughts

Targeting Attentional and Cognitive Control to Enhance the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Repetitive Negative Thinking

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04225624
Enrollment
65
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2021-04-30
Completion date
2025-04-09
Last updated
2026-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Keywords

OCD, GAD, MDD, Rumination, Obsession, Worry, Attention

Brief summary

The investigators are conducting this study to learn more about the cognitive and attentional processes among individuals with three types of repetitive negative thinking (RNT): mental rituals (as seen in obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD), worries (as seen in generalized anxiety disorder, GAD), and ruminations (as seen in major depressive disorder, MDD). Specifically, the investigators are studying whether psychological treatment can help people with RNT who have trouble stopping unwanted thoughts and shifting their attention.

Detailed description

The current study will examine whether enhancing attention regulation skills in a transdiagnostic intervention for repetitive negative thinking (RNT) will significantly improve the target of attentional/cognitive control. Phase 1 is an open pilot trial in which participants will be assigned to eight 60 minute sessions (over 8 weeks) of Emotion Regulation Therapy-Attention Regulation (AR-ERT). In Phase 2, participants will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to receive eight 60 minute sessions (over 8 weeks) of either: AR-ERT or Supportive Psychotherapy (SPT). The investigators will use a multi-method approach to measure attentional/cognitive control: (a) behavioral (i.e., eye tracking fixations and reaction time), (b) electrophysiological (i.e., event related potentials), and (c) self-report (i.e., perceived ability to shift and focus attention). They also will examine early signs of treatment efficacy of AR-ERT and SPT and target validation (i.e., whether changes in attentional/cognitive control correlate with changes in RNT and associated symptoms). Participants will receive assessments of these target and outcome measures at baseline (week 0), mid-treatment (week 4), post-treatment (week 8), and 3-month follow-up (week 20 - Phase 2 only). While most of these procedures are conducted virtually (e.g., therapy sessions), some (e.g., eye tracking and electrophysiological assessments) will be performed in-person. Findings could help identify a cross-cutting target that can be engaged to optimize treatment response for individuals with elevated RNT.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEmotion Regulation Therapy - Attention Regulation (AR-ERT)

Participants will receive a total of eight 60 minute sessions (over 8 weeks) of individual, manual-based AR-ERT. This intervention aims to build attention regulation skills (i.e., the ability to flexibly shift and sustain attention) by teaching participants exercises for Orienting their attention and Allowing the presence of negative emotions. Participants are taught to apply these skills to counteract reactive perseverative thinking when negative emotions arise as well as proactively engage with emotion-laden situations that trigger repetitive negative thinking.

Participants will receive a total of eight 60 minute sessions (over 8 weeks) of individual, manual-based SPT. This intervention addresses factors that may affect participants' repetitive negative thinking symptoms (for example, relationships, work, stress), and teaches skills for managing challenges by improving self-esteem and positive coping skills.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Independent evaluators will remain blind to treatment condition throughout the study for all participants. Participants and study therapists will be aware which treatment they have been assigned to.

Intervention model description

Phase 1: All participants will receive AR-ERT. Phase 2: At the baseline visit, eligible participants will be randomized (1:1 in parallel) to AR-ERT or SPT.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ages 18-60 years old * Right-handed * Living in Massachusetts * Repetitive Negative Thinking (RNT) in the form of mental rituals, worries, and/or depressive ruminations is the primary reason for seeking treatment * RNT significant enough to warrant intervention * Fluent in English, willing to provide informed consent, and willing to comply with the study protocol * Access to a device with an internet connection, camera, and microphone (e.g., computer, smart phone, tablet) * Comfortable and capable of using a computer and completing reaction-time tasks

Exclusion criteria

* History of head injury or neurologic disease, mental retardation, or borderline intellectual functioning that would interfere with ability to participate in the study. * Impaired (or uncorrected) vision, medical illness, or medical treatment that would interfere with participation. * Active suicidal or homicidal ideation or any features requiring a higher level of care. * Lifetime psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder * Substance or alcohol use disorder that would interfere with treatment. * Current Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) that would interfere with attentional tasks. * Unstable dose of psychotropic medications or recent discontinuation of psychotropic medication. * Current psychotherapy or plans to initiate such treatment during the study. * Previous course of treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy and/or mindfulness/meditation for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or depression.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Transdiagnostic Repetitive Negative Thinking (Measured by the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire [PTQ]) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)15-item self-report measure of transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking that includes items about thoughts as repetitive, intrusive, unproductive, and capturing mental capacity (e.g., "I think about many problems without solving any of them"). Total scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating more repetitive negative thinking (i.e., worse outcomes).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Worry (Measured by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire [PSWQ]) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)16-item self-report measure of the tendency to engage in excessive, uncontrollable, and generalized worry (e.g., "I am always worrying about something"). Total scores range from 16-80, with higher scores indicating more worry (i.e., worse outcomes).
Rumination (Measured by the Rumination Response Scale [RRS]) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)22-item self-report measure of the tendency to ruminate or dwell on one's distress and it's possible causes and consequences when feeling down, sad, or depressed (e.g., "Think about all your shortcomings, failings, faults, mistakes"). Total scores range from 22-88, with higher scores indicating more rumination (i.e., worse outcomes).
Mental Rituals (Measured by the Rumination on Obsessions and Compulsions Scale [ROCS] - Mental Neutralizing Subscale) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)The ROCS is a 33-item self-report measure that assesses the frequency of various mental responses to obsessional thoughts or images in the past month with 3 sub-scales: Mental Neutralizing, Acceptance, and Rumination on OCD symptoms (no total score is used). The Mental Neutralizing Sub-Scale is 18 items and specifically assesses mental rituals including arguing with oneself, reconstructing rituals, effort against thoughts, and distraction (e.g., "I feel compelled to collect all arguments that refute the intrusive thought or image"). Total scores (which are an average of the subscale items) range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating more mental rituals (i.e., worse outcomes).
OCD Symptom Severity (Measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS]) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)10-item clinician-administered interview measure of past week symptom severity of obsessions and compulsions including: time, interference, distress, resistance, and control. Total scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of OCD symptom severity (i.e., worse outcomes).
Generalized Anxiety Symptom Severity (Measured by the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [SIGH-A]) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)14-item structured, clinician-administered interview measure of past week anxiety symptom severity including: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, cognitive symptoms, depressed mood, somatic (muscular, sensory) symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and observed behavior. Total scores range from 0-56, with higher scores indicating higher levels of generalized anxiety symptoms (i.e., worse outcomes).
Depression Symptom Severity (Measured by the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [SIGH-D]) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)17-item interview measure of past week depression symptom severity including: depressed mood, interest in work and activities, insomnia (early, middle, and late), genital symptoms, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, loss of weight, general somatic symptoms, feelings of guilt, suicide, psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, hypochondriasis, insight, agitation, retardation. Total scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating more depression (i.e., worse outcomes).
Functional Impairment (Measured by the Work and Social Adjustment Scale [WSAS]) Assessed in Phase I (Pilot Trial) and Group Differences Compared at 8 Weeks in Phase 2 Randomized Controlled TrialWeek 0 (baseline), week 4 (mid-treatment), week 8 (post-treatment), and week 20 (3-month follow-up)5-item self-report scale assessing disability in work, home management, social leisure activities, private leisure activities, and the ability to form and maintain close relationships. Total scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating more functional impairment (i.e., worse outcomes).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRyan J Jacoby, Ph.D.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Phase I: 3 pilot participants were eligible and enrolled. Phase 2: 62 were eligible and randomized.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous31.07 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Education
College graduate
3 Participants
Education
Graduate or professional school
17 Participants
Education
High school graduate or less
5 Participants
Education
Some college
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 310 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 316 / 3112 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 310 / 31

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026