Skip to content

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the enVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Extraction

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Masked, Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the enVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Extraction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04224155
Enrollment
165
Registered
2020-01-13
Start date
2020-03-10
Completion date
2022-06-14
Last updated
2024-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the enVista trifocal intraocular lens when implanted in the capsular bag.

Interventions

DEVICEenVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs)

enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally

DEVICEenVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs)

enVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must be 18 years of age or older on the date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed. * Subjects must have the capability to understand and provide written informed consent on the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) and authorization as appropriate for local privacy regulations. * Subjects must have a Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) equal to or worse than 20/40 in at least one eye, with or without a glare source, due to a clinically significant cataract (cortical, nuclear, subcapsular, or combination) that is considered amenable to treatment with standard phacoemulsification cataract extraction and capsular IOL implantation. * Subjects must have a Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) projected to be equal to or better than 20/32 after IOL implantation in each eye, as determined by the medical judgment of the Investigator or measured by potential acuity meter (PAM) testing, if necessary. * Subjects must have clear intraocular media other than the cataract in both eyes. * Subjects must have discontinued use of contact lenses for at least 2 weeks (for hard lenses) or 3 days (for soft lenses) prior to the pre-operative examination and must be willing to refrain from use of contact lenses throughout the clinical study. * Contact lens wearers must demonstrate a stable refraction (within ±0.50 D for both sphere and cylinder) in both eyes, as determined by distance manifest refraction on two consecutive examination dates after discontinuation of contact lens wear. * Subjects must require an IOL power from +16.0 diopter (D) to +27.0 D in both eyes. * Subjects must be willing and able to comply with all treatment and follow-up study visits and procedures, and to undergo second eye surgery within 7-30 days of the first eye surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have participated in an investigational drug or device clinical investigation within 30 days prior to entry into this study and/or will participate in another investigation during the period of study participation. * Subjects who have any corneal pathology (e.g., significant scarring, guttata, inflammation, edema, dystrophy, etc.) in either eye. . ' * Subjects who have significant anterior segment pathology that might increase intraoperative risk or compromise IOL stability (e.g., pseudoexfoliation syndrome, synechiae, iris atrophy, traumatic cataract, lens subluxation, traumatic zonulolysis, zonular dialysis, evident zonular weakness or dehiscence, hypermature or brunescent cataract, etc.) in either eye. * Subjects who have uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye. * Subjects who have previous retinal detachment or clinically significant retinal pathology involving the macula in either eye. * Subjects who have proliferative or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in either eye. * Subjects who have a congenital ocular anomaly (e.g., aniridia, congenital cataract) in either eye. * Subjects with instability of keratometry or biometry measurements. * Subjects using any systemic or topical drug known to interfere with visual performance, pupil dilation, or iris structure within 30 days of enrollment or during the study. * Subjects who have current or previous usage of an alpha-I-selective adrenoceptor blocking agent or an antagonist of alpha IA adrenoceptor (e.g., Flomax® (tamsulosin HCI), Terazosin, or Cardura). * Subjects who have a history of chronic or recurrent inflammatory eye disease (e.g., iritis, scleritis, iridocyclitis, or rubeosis iridis) in either eye. * Subjects who have a visual disorder, other than cataracts, that could potentially cause future acuity losses to a level of 20/ I 00 or worse in either eye. * Subjects who have had previous intraocular or corneal surgery in either eye, with the exception of laser trabeculoplasty. * Subjects with any preoperative infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, or uveitis in either eye. * Subjects who have a preoperative corneal astigmatism\> 1.0 D in either eye as measured by corneal topography, irregular astigmatism, or skewed radial axis (note: corneal incisions intended specifically to reduce astigmatism are not allowed during the study). * Subjects who cannot achieve a minimum pharmacologic pupil dilation of 5.0 mm in both eyes. * Subjects who may be expected to require a combined or other secondary surgical procedure in either eye. * Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or at least 12 months postmenopausal) are excluded from enrollment in the study if they are nursing, lactating, currently pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study. Females of childbearing potential must be willing to practice effective contraception for the duration of the study. * Subjects with any other serious ocular pathology or underlying systemic medical condition (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes) or circumstance that, based on the Investigator's judgment, poses a concern for the subjects' safety or could confound the results of the study. * Subjects with abnormal pupillary dilation dynamics (as determined by the medical judgment of the investigator) or eccentric or ectopic pupils in either eye.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serious Adverse EventsDay 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationAll serious adverse events through Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Cumulative Rate of Secondary Surgical Interventions Due to the Optical Properties of the LensDay 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationThe cumulative rate of secondary surgical interventions (SSI) due to the optical properties of the lens, through Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). The rate was determined as the number of eyes with an SSI related to the optical properties of the IOL divided by the total number of eyes.
Photopic Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) for First Implanted EyesDay 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationPhotopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) for first implanted eyes at 4 m at Post.Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Photopic Uncorrected Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for First Implanted Eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, RespectivelyDay 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationPhotopic uncorrected near and intermediate visual acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for first implanted eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, respectively, at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationThe incidence of adverse events (AEs), through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation), compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint rates as defined in ISO 11979-7:2018 and EN ISO 11979-7:2018 Annex E. The observed AE rate was calculated as 100 multiplied by the number of eyes with the specific treatment-emergent event divided by the number of implanted eyes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Severe Visual DisturbanceDay 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationThe incidence of Patient-Reported Outcomes Set subjects experiencing at least one severe visual disturbance, defined as the highest grade of severity or bothersomeness (separately) reported by subjects using the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Incidence was calculated as 100 multiplied by Count of Participants experiencing at least one severe visual disturbance divided by Number of Participants Analyzed.
Change From Baseline ( Preoperative ) in Uncorrected Photopic Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively, for First Implanted Eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationChange from baseline ( preoperative ) in uncorrected photopic near and intermediate visual acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, respectively, for first implanted eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationPhotopic contrast sensitivity with glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular photopic (approximately 85 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity with glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) and was assessed in log units.
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationMesopic contrast sensitivity with glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular mesopic (2.5 to 3.2 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity with glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 cpd and was assessed in log units.
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationMesopic contrast sensitivity without glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular mesopic (2.5 to 3.2 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity without glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 cpd and was assessed in log units.
IOL Rotation for All Eyes at Post-Operative Visit 4Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantationIOL rotation for all eyes at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)
enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally
111
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)
enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): enVista MX60EFH trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally
222
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)
enVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): enVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally
54
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)
enVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): enVista MX60E monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally
107
Total494

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicenVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)TotalenVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)
Age, Continuous68.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.66
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.77
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
106 Participants159 Participants53 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
21 Participants32 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
80 Participants120 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
111 Participants165 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants82 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants83 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1110 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 1118 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1111 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Rate of Secondary Surgical Interventions Due to the Optical Properties of the Lens

The cumulative rate of secondary surgical interventions (SSI) due to the optical properties of the lens, through Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). The rate was determined as the number of eyes with an SSI related to the optical properties of the IOL divided by the total number of eyes.

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Cumulative Rate of Secondary Surgical Interventions Due to the Optical Properties of the Lens0 Eyes
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Cumulative Rate of Secondary Surgical Interventions Due to the Optical Properties of the Lens0 Eyes
Primary

Photopic Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) for First Implanted Eyes

Photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) for first implanted eyes at 4 m at Post.Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

Population: Per Protocol Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) for First Implanted Eyes0.121 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1343
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) for First Implanted Eyes0.044 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1224
Primary

Photopic Uncorrected Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for First Implanted Eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively

Photopic uncorrected near and intermediate visual acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for first implanted eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, respectively, at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Uncorrected Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for First Implanted Eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, RespectivelyUNVA0.210 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1294
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Uncorrected Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for First Implanted Eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, RespectivelyUIVA0.163 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1247
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Uncorrected Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for First Implanted Eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, RespectivelyUNVA0.476 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1587
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Uncorrected Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) for First Implanted Eyes at 40 cm and 66 cm, RespectivelyUIVA0.286 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1543
Primary

Serious Adverse Events

All serious adverse events through Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsNeck pain1 Participants
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsCerebrovascular accident0 Participants
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsNeoplasm malignant1 Participants
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsDry age-related macular degeneration1 Participants
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsDiverticulitis1 Participants
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsDry age-related macular degeneration0 Participants
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsDiverticulitis0 Participants
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsNeck pain0 Participants
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsNeoplasm malignant0 Participants
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Serious Adverse EventsCerebrovascular accident1 Participants
Primary

The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.

The incidence of adverse events (AEs), through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation), compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint rates as defined in ISO 11979-7:2018 and EN ISO 11979-7:2018 Annex E. The observed AE rate was calculated as 100 multiplied by the number of eyes with the specific treatment-emergent event divided by the number of implanted eyes.

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.Cystoid macular oedema3 Eyes
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.Hypopyon0 Eyes
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.Endophthalmitis0 Eyes
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.Lens dislocated from posterior chamber0 Eyes
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.Pupillary block0 Eyes
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.Retinal detachment0 Eyes
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)The Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Through Postoperative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 After Second Eye IOL Implantation), Compared to ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint Rates.SSI0 Eyes
Secondary

Change From Baseline ( Preoperative ) in Uncorrected Photopic Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively, for First Implanted Eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4

Change from baseline ( preoperative ) in uncorrected photopic near and intermediate visual acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, respectively, for first implanted eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Change From Baseline ( Preoperative ) in Uncorrected Photopic Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively, for First Implanted Eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4UNVA-0.502 logMARStandard Deviation 0.2947
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Change From Baseline ( Preoperative ) in Uncorrected Photopic Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively, for First Implanted Eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4UIVA-0.505 logMARStandard Deviation 0.2983
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Change From Baseline ( Preoperative ) in Uncorrected Photopic Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively, for First Implanted Eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4UNVA-0.157 logMARStandard Deviation 0.3062
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Change From Baseline ( Preoperative ) in Uncorrected Photopic Near and Intermediate Visual Acuity (UNVA and UIVA) at 40 cm and 66 cm, Respectively, for First Implanted Eyes to Post-Operative Visit 4UIVA-0.305 logMARStandard Deviation 0.3216
Secondary

Incidence of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Severe Visual Disturbance

The incidence of Patient-Reported Outcomes Set subjects experiencing at least one severe visual disturbance, defined as the highest grade of severity or bothersomeness (separately) reported by subjects using the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Incidence was calculated as 100 multiplied by Count of Participants experiencing at least one severe visual disturbance divided by Number of Participants Analyzed.

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

Population: PRO Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Incidence of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Severe Visual Disturbance16 Participants
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Incidence of Subjects Experiencing at Least One Severe Visual Disturbance4 Participants
Secondary

IOL Rotation for All Eyes at Post-Operative Visit 4

IOL rotation for all eyes at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation)

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)IOL Rotation for All Eyes at Post-Operative Visit 42.21 degreesStandard Deviation 2.501
Secondary

Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4

Mesopic contrast sensitivity with glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular mesopic (2.5 to 3.2 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity with glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 cpd and was assessed in log units.

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 1.5 cpd1.534 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3585
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 3 cpd1.552 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3405
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 6 cpd1.188 log valueStandard Deviation 0.302
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 12 cpd0.605 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3235
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 12 cpd0.882 log valueStandard Deviation 0.2936
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 1.5 cpd1.701 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3113
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 6 cpd1.577 log valueStandard Deviation 0.2668
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 3 cpd1.884 log valueStandard Deviation 0.2853
Secondary

Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4

Mesopic contrast sensitivity without glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular mesopic (2.5 to 3.2 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity without glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 cpd and was assessed in log units.

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 1.5 cpd2.024 log valueStandard Deviation 0.2661
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 3 cpd1.999 log valueStandard Deviation 0.2995
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 12 cpd0.881 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3646
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 6 cpd1.574 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3156
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 12 cpd1.014 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3298
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 1.5 cpd1.943 log valueStandard Deviation 0.4097
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 3 cpd2.100 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3775
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 6 cpd1.753 log valueStandard Deviation 0.4634
Secondary

Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4

Photopic contrast sensitivity with glare at Post-Operative Visit 4 (Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation). Binocular photopic (approximately 85 cd/m2) contrast sensitivity with glare was tested at spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) and was assessed in log units.

Time frame: Day 120 to Day 180 after second eye IOL implantation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 3 cpd1.703 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3497
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 6 cpd1.544 log valueStandard Deviation 0.2989
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 12 cpd1.249 log valueStandard Deviation 0.333
enVista MX60EFH Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 18 cpd0.749 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3483
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 18 cpd1.016 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3203
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 3 cpd1.965 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3259
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 12 cpd1.366 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3475
enVista MX60E Monofocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare at Post-Operative Visit 4At 6 cpd1.894 log valueStandard Deviation 0.3325

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026