Skip to content

4D- Flow- MRI After Aortic Valve Surgery

Changes of Aortic Flow Patterns Detected by 4D- Flow- MRI After Trileaflet Reconstruction of the Aortic Valve With Autologous Pericardium Compared to Prosthetic Valve Replacement With Biological Prosthesis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04223713
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-01-10
Start date
2020-01-14
Completion date
2021-08-31
Last updated
2021-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Disease

Keywords

aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, Trileaflet reconstruction of the aortic valve, Biological aortic valve prosthesis, aortic flow patterns, MRI

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial was designed to analyze flow patterns in the ascending aorta with MRI after either Trileaflet reconstruction of the aortic valve with autologous pericardium (TriRec) or surgical valve replacement with biological prosthesis. The hypothesis is that after TriRec procedure more physiological flow patterns will be observed, compared to biological valve prosthesis.

Detailed description

Trileaflet reconstruction of the aortic valve with autologous pericardium (TriRec) is a new treatment option for diseased aortic valves and offers benefits compared to conventional valve replacement. At the moment no prospective randomized trials evaluating the role of the TriRec procedure are available and factors contributing to long- term durability are unknown. The investigators want to examine aortic flow patterns with 4D- Flow- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients after the TriRec procedure or biological prosthetic valve replacement in a prospective randomized trial. Flow patterns in the ascending aorta, examined with 4D- Flow- MRI, show nearly laminar flow patterns and no outflow obstruction in healthy subjects with tricuspid aortic valves. In contrast, helical flow patterns, turbulences and increased flow velocities are observed in diseased valves and also after valve replacement with mechanical or biological prostheses. These helical flow patterns seem to influence aortic wall remodeling and may contribute to structural valve dysfunction of biological prosthesis. The investigators hypothesize that after TriRec procedure more physiological flow patterns will be observed, compared to biological valve prosthesis. The results can contribute to understand mechanisms for long- term performance of this technique and determine the role of this novel technique for treatment of aortic valve disease.

Interventions

PROCEDURETriRec

Trileaflet Reconstruction of the Aortic Valve

PROCEDUREAortic valve replacement

Biological Prosthesis, Device: Edwards Perimount

Sponsors

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 50 years * Documented symptomatic moderate or greater aortic stenosis or severe aortic insufficiency * Aortic annulus \> 19 mm * Written informed consent of the patients.

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant intervention of the aortic root, ascending aorta or aortic arch * Concomitant valve surgery * Emergency surgery for any reason * Neurological events (i.e. stroke, TIA) within the previous 6 months * Coagulation disorders (including thrombocytopenia \< 100.000/ml) * Porcelain aorta/severe calcification of the ascending aorta * Active endocarditis or other active systemic infections * Participating in another trial that may influence the outcome of this trial * Pregnancy * Dual antiplatelet therapy * Previous cardiac surgery (excluding percutaneous procedures) * Contraindication for MRI- examinations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flow velocity in the ascending aorta (m/s)Day 4-7 post surgeryFlow velocity in meters/ second in the ascending aorta in patients receiving either TriRec or biological prosthetic valve replacement measured by 4D- Flow- MRI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flow helicalityDay 4-7 post surgeryBlood revolving around an axis parallel to the main blood flow generating a corkscrew like figure
Systolic eccentricityDay 4-7 post surgeryLocalization of the main blood flow vector (central, little, severe eccentricity).
Flow patterns in the left ventricular outflow tract.Day 4-7 post surgeryFlow patterns in the left ventricular outflow tract.
Effective orifice area (4D-Flow-MRI)Day 4-7 post surgeryEffective orifice area (cm2) of the reconstructed or replaced valve (4D- Flow- MRI)
Effective orifice area (TTE)Day 4-7 post surgeryEffective orifice area (cm2) of the reconstructed or replaced valve (transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Flow vorticesDay 4-7 post surgeryFlow vortices: defined as rotating particles around a point within the vessel with the rotational direction diverting \> 90° from the physiological flow direction.
Left- ventricular diameters (mm, TTE)Day 4-7 post surgeryLeft- ventricular diameters (mm, TTE)
Left- ventricular ejection fraction (%, TTE)Day 4-7 post surgeryLeft- ventricular ejection fraction (%, TTE)
Quantification of aortic regurgitation (MRI)Day 4-7 post surgeryQuantification of aortic regurgitation (MRI)
Quantification of aortic regurgitation (TTE)Day 4-7 post surgeryQuantification of aortic regurgitation (TTE)
Peak- and mean pressure gradients (mmHg, TTE)Day 4-7 post surgeryPeak- and mean pressure gradients (mmHg, TTE)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactAnatol Prinzing, MD
prinzing@dhm.mhn.de+49891218

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026