Skip to content

Blue Protocol Assessment

Interest Assessment of the Blue Protocol in Improving Diagnosis of Dyspneic Patients in Pre- and Intra-hospital Emergency Medicine

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04223297
Acronym
Blue P
Enrollment
115
Registered
2020-01-10
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2020-09-01
Last updated
2023-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyspnea, Emergencies

Keywords

dyspnea, lung ultrasound, emergency medicine, blue protocol

Brief summary

Acute dyspnea is a common disease in emergency medicine. Mortality remains high is estimated at 15%. One third of initial diagnoses before paraclinical examination are estimated to be inaccurate. Lung ultrasound is a quick and immediate examination. Also, it is provided and performed at the bedside. The Blue protocol was designed by Daniel A. Lichtenstein as a diagnostic aid in dyspneic patients. It allows to obtain a diagnostic in more than 90% of acute dyspnea. However there is no validation in emergency medicine. The main purpose is to evaluate the interest of the Blue protocol in the management and orientation of the dyspneic patient

Interventions

PROCEDURElung ultrasound

The lung ultrasound will be performed by following the Blue protocol

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier de Clermont
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier de Montreuil sur Mer
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier de Compiègne
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier de Doullens
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier de Abbeville
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age over 18 years * dyspneic patient requiring management by an emergency physician * information given and no patient opposition.

Exclusion criteria

* patient under a legal protection measure * lack of social security

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
concordance between the clinical diagnosis and the final diagnosisday of arrival in emergencycomparison of the concordance between the clinical diagnosis and the final diagnosis
concordance between the diagnosis establishes after the ultrasonography and the final diagnosisday of arrival in emergencyconcordance between the diagnosis establishes after the ultrasonography and the final diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of proportion of examinations leading to a change in the therapeutic hypothesis8 monthsChange of proportion of examinations leading to a change in the therapeutic hypothesis

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026