Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Conditions
Keywords
diabetes, neuropathy, fish oil, cornea, omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
Brief summary
Peripheral neuropathy affects about 50% of the diabetic population and there is no treatment other than good blood glucose control, which is ineffective in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Part of the problem for the lack of an effective treatment is the inability to detect peripheral neuropathy in its early stage. The hypotheses to be addressed in the first phase of this study is that changes in cornea sensitivity (blinking and squinting) following addition of a hyperosmotic solution will provide a novel screening tool for early diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy. For the second phase of the study the investigators will examine the effect of fish oil treatment of diabetic subjects with neuropathy on corneal nerve density and sensitivity. Corneal nerves are the most highly innervated part of the human body with great sensitivity. The first phase will use this property and determine whether sensitivity is lost in diabetic patients with neuropathy. Preclinical studies have supported this hypothesis and now this will be tested in human subjects. Preclinical studies have also shown that treating diabetic rodents with fish oil improves nerve regeneration and outcome measures of peripheral in diabetic rodents. In the second phase the investigators will perform preliminary studies in human subjects with diabetic neuropathy and determine whether treating them with fish oil increases corneal nerve density and sensitivity.
Detailed description
Recruitment has been suspended because of the COVID-19 crisis and the Iowa City VA is just beginning to have face to face appointments. The hypotheses to be studied in the following specific aims is that changes in cornea sensitivity to a hyperosmotic solution will provide a novel screening tool for early diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The investigators also propose that clinical feasibility studies will demonstrate that treatment with fish oil will improve outcome measures of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Specific aims: 1. Determine if the reflex squinting and blinking response to the application of a hyperosmotic solution to the cornea is impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without peripheral neuropathy. a. Determine whether changes in corneal sensitivity correlate with loss of cornea nerves in the sub-epithelial layer of the cornea and symptom scores for PN. 2. Determine if treating human subjects with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy with an oral fish oil supplement increases circulating levels of resolvin D1, restores cornea sensitivity to a hyperosmotic eye drop challenge and improves corneal nerve density and symptom scores for peripheral neuropathy. For this first phase the investigators will enroll 75 subjects to participate (Fifty subjects with type 2 diabetes; 25 with clinically detectable peripheral neuropathy and 25 without neuropathy will be enrolled as well as 25 age-matched control subjects). In the second phase of the study the investigators will investigate whether increased intake of fish oil improves diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Subjects will receive 4g (2g twice a day) of fish oil per day in capsule form. The investigators first introduced fish oil as a successful treatment of peripheral neuropathy in pre-clinical studies with diabetic rodents and will now expand those studies , culminating in this feasibility study of treatment using human subjects with type 2 diabetes and neuropathy. In this study non diabetic subjects (control) and subjects with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy will be recruited from phase 1 of this study to participate in the phase 2 treatment phase of the study. A baseline determination of their neuropathy (Subjective Peripheral Neuropathy Screen Questionnaire) including evaluation of corneal nerve structure and sensitivity and blood sample will be performed. Tests besides the questionnaire to be used to screen the subjects for peripheral neuropathy will include 10 g mono filament, vibration threshold, ankle reflex and sensitivity to warm and cold stimulus. Subjects will then be instructed to take 2 fish oil capsules twice a day. Subjects will return at 4, 8 and 12 months for re-evaluation. If successful, the feasibility study will provide a proof of concept to advance fish oils to a larger clinical trial for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Visual acuity (subject's vision) will be measured by having the subject read the smallest letters on an eye chart with their glasses or best correction. This takes about 5 minutes or less. Slit lamp examination: A standard slit lamp examination will be performed to insure that no exclusion criteria are present and no corneal abrasion is present. The corneal sensitivity procedure will consist of applying a drop of 5% Muro 128 to the eye and recording the blinking and squinting response over the next 5 minutes. Based on preclinical studies it is anticipated that normal subjects will have an increased blinking and squinting response seconds after the addition of the hyperosmotic solution (5% Muro 128), whereas diabetic subjects with neuropathy will have a attenuated response. Corneal sensation threshold: Corneal sensation will also be measured in each eye using a handheld Luneau Cochet -Bonnet aesthesiometer. This device contains a thin, retractable, nylon monofilament in which the length (stiffness) is varied between 6.0 mm and 1.0 mm until the subject can detect the touch on their central cornea, resulting in a blink reflex. In each eye, testing will begin with the 6.0 mm filament, after which the length will be progressively shortened by 0.5 mm until the patient reports sensing the corneal contact. Each eye will be tested three times and the best performance (in terms of longest filament that is perceived to touch the cornea) will be recorded as the corneal sensation threshold. Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT): The thickness of the optic nerve and macula will also be measured inside of the eye using a special camera that forms an image of the layers of the retina. The imaging is harmless and measures the thickness or structural health of retinal layers and optic nerve. A new feature of OCT is eye-tracking. Eye tracking does not take any longer since it is done simultaneously with the imaging. Eye tracking during OCT may give us new insight into some eye disorders. This test takes approximately 10 minutes. A hand-held pupillometer/electroretinogram device (RETeval, LKC) will be held in front of the subject s eye, but will not touch the eye. The device will provide a brief, a series of brief light stimuli and then record the pupil response and the elicited electrical response from the retina from a surface skin patch (electrode) placed below each eye, from the light as a measure of whether the inherent sensitivity of the eye in the retina is normal. The investigators will repeat this in the left eye. The visible light stimulus is safe and is given at an intensity experienced in normal daily light exposures. The test takes about 2 minutes per eye.
Interventions
Subjects enrolled in phase two of the study will be instructed to take 4 capsules per day (2 in the morning and 2 in the evening). Each capsule contains 1000 mg of triglyceride; 35% eicosapentaenoic acid and 25% docosahexaenoic acid.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
The study will be done in two phases. In the second phase the investigators will investigate whether increased intake of fish oil improves diabetic peripheral neuropathy including improvement in corneal nerve morphology and sensitivity. Subjects will receive 4g (2g twice a day) of fish oil per day in capsule form. The second phase of the study will be done in 2 of the 3 groups. The two groups for this phase of the study will be the control subjects and the diabetic subjects with neuropathy.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Type 2 diabetes patients diagnosed based on the opinion of an Endocrinologist (Dr. Correia), the absence of a history of ketoacidosis, and a C-peptide \> 0.8 ng/ml * At least 5 year known duration of diabetes. * HbA1c \< 9.0% * None or mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy based on medical record, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument including response to monofilament test, ankle reflex test, vibration perception threshold examination using a 128 Hz tuning fork as well as hot and cold sensation evaluation
Exclusion criteria
* Any neurologic, muscular, genetic, or other condition known to affect nerve or muscle function * Electrolyte abnormalities, untreated hypothyroidism, abnormalities in calcium, phosphate, or magnesium concentrations, or any other metabolic disturbance affecting neural function * Cigarette smoking in the past year * Peripheral vascular, cardiac, pulmonary, or any other disorder affecting blood or tissue oxygenation * Risk of bleeding disorder or on medication known to increase risk of bleeding * History for use of aspirin * Any other medical or psychological condition judged to limit compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results * History of diabetic foot ulcer * LDL \> 100 mg/100ml, HDL \< 30 mg/100ml, Triglyceride \> 400 mg/100ml.\* 10) BP \< 140 systolic and 80 diastolic * BMI 45 * Insulin use to manage diabetes 200 units * History of taking fish oil supplements * The investigators are limiting subject population to those over 50 thus pregnancy should not be an issue nonetheless females who are pregnant, looking to become pregnant or are breast feeding will be excluded (\* After overnight fast of 8-12 h; Average of three determinations in the sitting position after at least 5 minutes rest.)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cornea Sensitivity | Examination of the response to saline and Muro 128 is preformed once in each patient immediately following their consent or if they request at a later more convenient time. | Cornea sensitivity to a isotonic and hyperosmotic solution is evaluated as the amount of time the eyelid is closed over a period of 150 seconds following application of first isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) followed by Muro 128 (5% NaCl solution) after a 5 minute recovery/washout period. The evaluation is done from analyzing the recordings of each event using a multi-camera video platform. The results are reported for response to saline (baseline) and Muro (stimulant) solutions as a ratio of the time the eyelids are closed vs. open over the 150 second period of the recording. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument | Done once as part of the determination to the subjects peripheral neuropathy. | All subjects will answer a 15 question survey that relates to symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. The score range is 0-13 with the higher score indicating poorer outcome or increased peripheral neuropathy. |
| Sensitivity to 10 g Monofilament Test | Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy | The 10 g monofilament test is a routine evaluation used to screen the diabetic foot for loss of sensory sensation and part of the standard of care for any diabetic patient. The subject will remove their footwear and lie down on a table. The filament will be applied perpendicular to the skin surface on the bottom of the feet will sufficient force to allow the filament to bend. This is repeated 5 times. Each subject will be asked to tell the examiner if they feel it. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the monofilament the value each time the score given is 0. If there is no feeling the value is 1. For reduced sensitivity, for example feels the monofilament 2 or 3 times during the test the score is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy. |
| Presence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great Toe | Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy | Vibratory sensation is a standard of care test used with patients with diabetes to test sensory nerve sensation. A 128 Hz tuning fork is used and placed over the dorsum of the great toe on the boney prominence of the distal interphalangeal joint. The subject is asked to tell the examiner if they feel the object touching their toe. This is repeated 3 times. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the object the score given is 0. If the subject fails to feel the object all 3 times the score is 1. If they feel it once or twice during the examination the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy. |
| Change in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet Filament | Done once to determine whether there is a difference between control and diabetes subjects with peripheral neuropathy | This test records the mechanical sensitivity of the cornea to a filament that is touched to the cornea. The rigidity of the filament can be adjusted and the outcome is the length of the filament (6 to 1 cm) when the subjects blinks. The data will be recorded as cm. |
| Visual Acuity | Done once to determine the subjects visual ability | A routine visual acuity eye examination will be performed. Subjects vision will be measured by having the subject read the smallest letters on an eye chart with their glasses or best correction. Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the ability of the eye to distinguish shapes and the details of objects at a given distance (20 feet). A person with normal vision scores 20/20 as did all our controls. A person with 20/40 vision sees things at 20 feet that most people who don't need vision correction can see at 40 feet. Our subjects with diabetic neuropathy mean score was 20/25. The first number in the score is the number of feet for the test and this is commonly 20 feet. The second number is their visualization of the letters on the eye chart. The investigators used the mean of the second number for analysis. This takes about 5 minutes or less. |
| Questionnaires for Corneal Sensitivity | Done once to determine extent of common eye disease such as dry eye | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI contains 12 questions relating to eye sensitivity to light, vision acuity, dryness, sensitivity when reading, using the computer, and watching TV). The OSDI is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability. |
| Determination of Tibial Nerve Conduction Velocity | Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy | This is a non-invasive method of determining conduction velocity of the tibial nerve. the scale is meters per second or m/s. The subject will be instructed to lie down on a examination table with shoes and socks removed. Afterwards, the lower ankle will be swabbed with an alcohol patch and allowed to air dry. A device containing 2 posts (about 3 inches apart) will be placed on the lower ankle in the region of the Achilles and activated. For a period of 5-10 sec the device sends a pulse stimulating the nerve distally (post located at the lower part of the ankle) and the response recorded by the post located distally on the skin of the upper part of the ankle. The nerve conduction is recorded electronically by the device and data down loaded to a secured computer. During the time of the analyses the subject will feel dual pulsating sensation that will last up to 10 sec. |
| Presence of Reflex | Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy | Reflex testing is commonly used to detect sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients. The ankle reflex is examined by aligning the subjects ankle into a neutral position and the examiner strikes the Achilles tendon with a neurological hammer. An abnormal result is recorded if the subject does not display any ankle plantarflexion. The scale is 0 to 1. If the reflex is present the score given is 0. If no reflex is present the score given is 1. If the response is reduced the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
The reviewer is correct. Due to the pandemic the course of this study was dramatically changed. Initially there was going to be 2 separate protocols the first to measure cornea sensitivity using a hyperosmotic solution in 3 groups control, and diabetes with or without neuropathy. The second protocol was to be treatment with fish oil to determine whether improvement occurs. Because of COVID we were able to complete only protocol 1 and it was done in only control and diabetes neuropathy subjects.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy Subjects with type 2 diabetes will be enrolled and determination if they have neuropathy will be determined from their clinical record and evaluation. | 28 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes Healthy, aged matched control subjects will be enrolled and determination if they have neuropathy will be determined from their clinical record and evaluation. | 16 |
| Total | 44 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 15 Participants | 2 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 13 Participants | 14 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 66.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 | 49.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | 56.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 |
| cornea sensitivity using Cochet-Bonnet | 5.68 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47 | 5.95 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14 | 5.78 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41 |
| cornea sensitivity using isotonic solution | 0.089 time ratio eyelids closed vs. open STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.012 | 0.085 time ratio eyelids closed vs. open STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.027 | 0.088 time ratio eyelids closed vs. open STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.01 |
| Dry eye (DEQ 5) questionnaire | 7.12 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 | 2.00 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31 | 5.26 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.31 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 26 Participants | 15 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Michigan neuropathy screening instrument | 5.72 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52 | 0.54 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03 | 3.84 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.68 |
| nerve amplitude | 3.80 uV STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.39 | 14.63 uV STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.86 | 7.74 uV STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.98 |
| nerve conduction | 35.6 m/s STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 50.5 m/s STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 | 41.0 m/s STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 |
| Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire | 11.36 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 | 1.09 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59 | 7.63 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 24 Participants | 15 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 28 Participants | 16 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 24 Participants | 11 Participants | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 28 | 0 / 28 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 28 | 0 / 16 |
Outcome results
Cornea Sensitivity
Cornea sensitivity to a isotonic and hyperosmotic solution is evaluated as the amount of time the eyelid is closed over a period of 150 seconds following application of first isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) followed by Muro 128 (5% NaCl solution) after a 5 minute recovery/washout period. The evaluation is done from analyzing the recordings of each event using a multi-camera video platform. The results are reported for response to saline (baseline) and Muro (stimulant) solutions as a ratio of the time the eyelids are closed vs. open over the 150 second period of the recording.
Time frame: Examination of the response to saline and Muro 128 is preformed once in each patient immediately following their consent or if they request at a later more convenient time.
Population: primary outcome
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Cornea Sensitivity | 0.177 time ratio of eyelids closed vs. open | Standard Deviation 0.073 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Cornea Sensitivity | 0.293 time ratio of eyelids closed vs. open | Standard Deviation 0.036 |
Change in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet Filament
This test records the mechanical sensitivity of the cornea to a filament that is touched to the cornea. The rigidity of the filament can be adjusted and the outcome is the length of the filament (6 to 1 cm) when the subjects blinks. The data will be recorded as cm.
Time frame: Done once to determine whether there is a difference between control and diabetes subjects with peripheral neuropathy
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Change in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet Filament | 5.683 cm | Standard Error 0.066 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Change in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet Filament | 5.953 cm | Standard Error 0.026 |
Determination of Tibial Nerve Conduction Velocity
This is a non-invasive method of determining conduction velocity of the tibial nerve. the scale is meters per second or m/s. The subject will be instructed to lie down on a examination table with shoes and socks removed. Afterwards, the lower ankle will be swabbed with an alcohol patch and allowed to air dry. A device containing 2 posts (about 3 inches apart) will be placed on the lower ankle in the region of the Achilles and activated. For a period of 5-10 sec the device sends a pulse stimulating the nerve distally (post located at the lower part of the ankle) and the response recorded by the post located distally on the skin of the upper part of the ankle. The nerve conduction is recorded electronically by the device and data down loaded to a secured computer. During the time of the analyses the subject will feel dual pulsating sensation that will last up to 10 sec.
Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Determination of Tibial Nerve Conduction Velocity | 35.60 m/s | Standard Error 4.19 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Determination of Tibial Nerve Conduction Velocity | 50.50 m/s | Standard Error 3.68 |
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument
All subjects will answer a 15 question survey that relates to symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. The score range is 0-13 with the higher score indicating poorer outcome or increased peripheral neuropathy.
Time frame: Done once as part of the determination to the subjects peripheral neuropathy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument | 5.720 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0505 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument | 0.5455 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3123 |
Presence of Reflex
Reflex testing is commonly used to detect sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients. The ankle reflex is examined by aligning the subjects ankle into a neutral position and the examiner strikes the Achilles tendon with a neurological hammer. An abnormal result is recorded if the subject does not display any ankle plantarflexion. The scale is 0 to 1. If the reflex is present the score given is 0. If no reflex is present the score given is 1. If the response is reduced the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.
Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Presence of Reflex | 0.8125 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07855 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Presence of Reflex | 0.000 units on a scale | Standard Error 0 |
Presence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great Toe
Vibratory sensation is a standard of care test used with patients with diabetes to test sensory nerve sensation. A 128 Hz tuning fork is used and placed over the dorsum of the great toe on the boney prominence of the distal interphalangeal joint. The subject is asked to tell the examiner if they feel the object touching their toe. This is repeated 3 times. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the object the score given is 0. If the subject fails to feel the object all 3 times the score is 1. If they feel it once or twice during the examination the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.
Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Presence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great Toe | 0.6731 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0551 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Presence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great Toe | 0.000 units on a scale | Standard Error 0 |
Questionnaires for Corneal Sensitivity
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI contains 12 questions relating to eye sensitivity to light, vision acuity, dryness, sensitivity when reading, using the computer, and watching TV). The OSDI is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.
Time frame: Done once to determine extent of common eye disease such as dry eye
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Questionnaires for Corneal Sensitivity | 11.36 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.96 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Questionnaires for Corneal Sensitivity | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.78 |
Sensitivity to 10 g Monofilament Test
The 10 g monofilament test is a routine evaluation used to screen the diabetic foot for loss of sensory sensation and part of the standard of care for any diabetic patient. The subject will remove their footwear and lie down on a table. The filament will be applied perpendicular to the skin surface on the bottom of the feet will sufficient force to allow the filament to bend. This is repeated 5 times. Each subject will be asked to tell the examiner if they feel it. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the monofilament the value each time the score given is 0. If there is no feeling the value is 1. For reduced sensitivity, for example feels the monofilament 2 or 3 times during the test the score is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.
Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Sensitivity to 10 g Monofilament Test | 0.5577 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07507 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Sensitivity to 10 g Monofilament Test | 0.000 units on a scale | Standard Error 0 |
Visual Acuity
A routine visual acuity eye examination will be performed. Subjects vision will be measured by having the subject read the smallest letters on an eye chart with their glasses or best correction. Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the ability of the eye to distinguish shapes and the details of objects at a given distance (20 feet). A person with normal vision scores 20/20 as did all our controls. A person with 20/40 vision sees things at 20 feet that most people who don't need vision correction can see at 40 feet. Our subjects with diabetic neuropathy mean score was 20/25. The first number in the score is the number of feet for the test and this is commonly 20 feet. The second number is their visualization of the letters on the eye chart. The investigators used the mean of the second number for analysis. This takes about 5 minutes or less.
Time frame: Done once to determine the subjects visual ability
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy | Visual Acuity | 25 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.001 |
| Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes | Visual Acuity | 20 units on a scale | Standard Error 0 |