Skip to content

Corneal Nerves Function and Structure

Diabetic Neuropathy: Function-Structure of Corneal Nerves to Assess Injury-Repair

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04222660
Enrollment
44
Registered
2020-01-10
Start date
2021-06-21
Completion date
2025-05-13
Last updated
2025-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Keywords

diabetes, neuropathy, fish oil, cornea, omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids

Brief summary

Peripheral neuropathy affects about 50% of the diabetic population and there is no treatment other than good blood glucose control, which is ineffective in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Part of the problem for the lack of an effective treatment is the inability to detect peripheral neuropathy in its early stage. The hypotheses to be addressed in the first phase of this study is that changes in cornea sensitivity (blinking and squinting) following addition of a hyperosmotic solution will provide a novel screening tool for early diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy. For the second phase of the study the investigators will examine the effect of fish oil treatment of diabetic subjects with neuropathy on corneal nerve density and sensitivity. Corneal nerves are the most highly innervated part of the human body with great sensitivity. The first phase will use this property and determine whether sensitivity is lost in diabetic patients with neuropathy. Preclinical studies have supported this hypothesis and now this will be tested in human subjects. Preclinical studies have also shown that treating diabetic rodents with fish oil improves nerve regeneration and outcome measures of peripheral in diabetic rodents. In the second phase the investigators will perform preliminary studies in human subjects with diabetic neuropathy and determine whether treating them with fish oil increases corneal nerve density and sensitivity.

Detailed description

Recruitment has been suspended because of the COVID-19 crisis and the Iowa City VA is just beginning to have face to face appointments. The hypotheses to be studied in the following specific aims is that changes in cornea sensitivity to a hyperosmotic solution will provide a novel screening tool for early diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The investigators also propose that clinical feasibility studies will demonstrate that treatment with fish oil will improve outcome measures of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Specific aims: 1. Determine if the reflex squinting and blinking response to the application of a hyperosmotic solution to the cornea is impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without peripheral neuropathy. a. Determine whether changes in corneal sensitivity correlate with loss of cornea nerves in the sub-epithelial layer of the cornea and symptom scores for PN. 2. Determine if treating human subjects with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy with an oral fish oil supplement increases circulating levels of resolvin D1, restores cornea sensitivity to a hyperosmotic eye drop challenge and improves corneal nerve density and symptom scores for peripheral neuropathy. For this first phase the investigators will enroll 75 subjects to participate (Fifty subjects with type 2 diabetes; 25 with clinically detectable peripheral neuropathy and 25 without neuropathy will be enrolled as well as 25 age-matched control subjects). In the second phase of the study the investigators will investigate whether increased intake of fish oil improves diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Subjects will receive 4g (2g twice a day) of fish oil per day in capsule form. The investigators first introduced fish oil as a successful treatment of peripheral neuropathy in pre-clinical studies with diabetic rodents and will now expand those studies , culminating in this feasibility study of treatment using human subjects with type 2 diabetes and neuropathy. In this study non diabetic subjects (control) and subjects with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy will be recruited from phase 1 of this study to participate in the phase 2 treatment phase of the study. A baseline determination of their neuropathy (Subjective Peripheral Neuropathy Screen Questionnaire) including evaluation of corneal nerve structure and sensitivity and blood sample will be performed. Tests besides the questionnaire to be used to screen the subjects for peripheral neuropathy will include 10 g mono filament, vibration threshold, ankle reflex and sensitivity to warm and cold stimulus. Subjects will then be instructed to take 2 fish oil capsules twice a day. Subjects will return at 4, 8 and 12 months for re-evaluation. If successful, the feasibility study will provide a proof of concept to advance fish oils to a larger clinical trial for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Visual acuity (subject's vision) will be measured by having the subject read the smallest letters on an eye chart with their glasses or best correction. This takes about 5 minutes or less. Slit lamp examination: A standard slit lamp examination will be performed to insure that no exclusion criteria are present and no corneal abrasion is present. The corneal sensitivity procedure will consist of applying a drop of 5% Muro 128 to the eye and recording the blinking and squinting response over the next 5 minutes. Based on preclinical studies it is anticipated that normal subjects will have an increased blinking and squinting response seconds after the addition of the hyperosmotic solution (5% Muro 128), whereas diabetic subjects with neuropathy will have a attenuated response. Corneal sensation threshold: Corneal sensation will also be measured in each eye using a handheld Luneau Cochet -Bonnet aesthesiometer. This device contains a thin, retractable, nylon monofilament in which the length (stiffness) is varied between 6.0 mm and 1.0 mm until the subject can detect the touch on their central cornea, resulting in a blink reflex. In each eye, testing will begin with the 6.0 mm filament, after which the length will be progressively shortened by 0.5 mm until the patient reports sensing the corneal contact. Each eye will be tested three times and the best performance (in terms of longest filament that is perceived to touch the cornea) will be recorded as the corneal sensation threshold. Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT): The thickness of the optic nerve and macula will also be measured inside of the eye using a special camera that forms an image of the layers of the retina. The imaging is harmless and measures the thickness or structural health of retinal layers and optic nerve. A new feature of OCT is eye-tracking. Eye tracking does not take any longer since it is done simultaneously with the imaging. Eye tracking during OCT may give us new insight into some eye disorders. This test takes approximately 10 minutes. A hand-held pupillometer/electroretinogram device (RETeval, LKC) will be held in front of the subject s eye, but will not touch the eye. The device will provide a brief, a series of brief light stimuli and then record the pupil response and the elicited electrical response from the retina from a surface skin patch (electrode) placed below each eye, from the light as a measure of whether the inherent sensitivity of the eye in the retina is normal. The investigators will repeat this in the left eye. The visible light stimulus is safe and is given at an intensity experienced in normal daily light exposures. The test takes about 2 minutes per eye.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTBlackmores Omega Daily (4 1g capsules per day)

Subjects enrolled in phase two of the study will be instructed to take 4 capsules per day (2 in the morning and 2 in the evening). Each capsule contains 1000 mg of triglyceride; 35% eicosapentaenoic acid and 25% docosahexaenoic acid.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study will be done in two phases. In the second phase the investigators will investigate whether increased intake of fish oil improves diabetic peripheral neuropathy including improvement in corneal nerve morphology and sensitivity. Subjects will receive 4g (2g twice a day) of fish oil per day in capsule form. The second phase of the study will be done in 2 of the 3 groups. The two groups for this phase of the study will be the control subjects and the diabetic subjects with neuropathy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes patients diagnosed based on the opinion of an Endocrinologist (Dr. Correia), the absence of a history of ketoacidosis, and a C-peptide \> 0.8 ng/ml * At least 5 year known duration of diabetes. * HbA1c \< 9.0% * None or mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy based on medical record, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument including response to monofilament test, ankle reflex test, vibration perception threshold examination using a 128 Hz tuning fork as well as hot and cold sensation evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* Any neurologic, muscular, genetic, or other condition known to affect nerve or muscle function * Electrolyte abnormalities, untreated hypothyroidism, abnormalities in calcium, phosphate, or magnesium concentrations, or any other metabolic disturbance affecting neural function * Cigarette smoking in the past year * Peripheral vascular, cardiac, pulmonary, or any other disorder affecting blood or tissue oxygenation * Risk of bleeding disorder or on medication known to increase risk of bleeding * History for use of aspirin * Any other medical or psychological condition judged to limit compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results * History of diabetic foot ulcer * LDL \> 100 mg/100ml, HDL \< 30 mg/100ml, Triglyceride \> 400 mg/100ml.\* 10) BP \< 140 systolic and 80 diastolic * BMI 45 * Insulin use to manage diabetes 200 units * History of taking fish oil supplements * The investigators are limiting subject population to those over 50 thus pregnancy should not be an issue nonetheless females who are pregnant, looking to become pregnant or are breast feeding will be excluded (\* After overnight fast of 8-12 h; Average of three determinations in the sitting position after at least 5 minutes rest.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cornea SensitivityExamination of the response to saline and Muro 128 is preformed once in each patient immediately following their consent or if they request at a later more convenient time.Cornea sensitivity to a isotonic and hyperosmotic solution is evaluated as the amount of time the eyelid is closed over a period of 150 seconds following application of first isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) followed by Muro 128 (5% NaCl solution) after a 5 minute recovery/washout period. The evaluation is done from analyzing the recordings of each event using a multi-camera video platform. The results are reported for response to saline (baseline) and Muro (stimulant) solutions as a ratio of the time the eyelids are closed vs. open over the 150 second period of the recording.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Michigan Neuropathy Screening InstrumentDone once as part of the determination to the subjects peripheral neuropathy.All subjects will answer a 15 question survey that relates to symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. The score range is 0-13 with the higher score indicating poorer outcome or increased peripheral neuropathy.
Sensitivity to 10 g Monofilament TestDone once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathyThe 10 g monofilament test is a routine evaluation used to screen the diabetic foot for loss of sensory sensation and part of the standard of care for any diabetic patient. The subject will remove their footwear and lie down on a table. The filament will be applied perpendicular to the skin surface on the bottom of the feet will sufficient force to allow the filament to bend. This is repeated 5 times. Each subject will be asked to tell the examiner if they feel it. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the monofilament the value each time the score given is 0. If there is no feeling the value is 1. For reduced sensitivity, for example feels the monofilament 2 or 3 times during the test the score is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.
Presence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great ToeDone once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathyVibratory sensation is a standard of care test used with patients with diabetes to test sensory nerve sensation. A 128 Hz tuning fork is used and placed over the dorsum of the great toe on the boney prominence of the distal interphalangeal joint. The subject is asked to tell the examiner if they feel the object touching their toe. This is repeated 3 times. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the object the score given is 0. If the subject fails to feel the object all 3 times the score is 1. If they feel it once or twice during the examination the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.
Change in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet FilamentDone once to determine whether there is a difference between control and diabetes subjects with peripheral neuropathyThis test records the mechanical sensitivity of the cornea to a filament that is touched to the cornea. The rigidity of the filament can be adjusted and the outcome is the length of the filament (6 to 1 cm) when the subjects blinks. The data will be recorded as cm.
Visual AcuityDone once to determine the subjects visual abilityA routine visual acuity eye examination will be performed. Subjects vision will be measured by having the subject read the smallest letters on an eye chart with their glasses or best correction. Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the ability of the eye to distinguish shapes and the details of objects at a given distance (20 feet). A person with normal vision scores 20/20 as did all our controls. A person with 20/40 vision sees things at 20 feet that most people who don't need vision correction can see at 40 feet. Our subjects with diabetic neuropathy mean score was 20/25. The first number in the score is the number of feet for the test and this is commonly 20 feet. The second number is their visualization of the letters on the eye chart. The investigators used the mean of the second number for analysis. This takes about 5 minutes or less.
Questionnaires for Corneal SensitivityDone once to determine extent of common eye disease such as dry eyeOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI contains 12 questions relating to eye sensitivity to light, vision acuity, dryness, sensitivity when reading, using the computer, and watching TV). The OSDI is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.
Determination of Tibial Nerve Conduction VelocityDone once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathyThis is a non-invasive method of determining conduction velocity of the tibial nerve. the scale is meters per second or m/s. The subject will be instructed to lie down on a examination table with shoes and socks removed. Afterwards, the lower ankle will be swabbed with an alcohol patch and allowed to air dry. A device containing 2 posts (about 3 inches apart) will be placed on the lower ankle in the region of the Achilles and activated. For a period of 5-10 sec the device sends a pulse stimulating the nerve distally (post located at the lower part of the ankle) and the response recorded by the post located distally on the skin of the upper part of the ankle. The nerve conduction is recorded electronically by the device and data down loaded to a secured computer. During the time of the analyses the subject will feel dual pulsating sensation that will last up to 10 sec.
Presence of ReflexDone once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathyReflex testing is commonly used to detect sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients. The ankle reflex is examined by aligning the subjects ankle into a neutral position and the examiner strikes the Achilles tendon with a neurological hammer. An abnormal result is recorded if the subject does not display any ankle plantarflexion. The scale is 0 to 1. If the reflex is present the score given is 0. If no reflex is present the score given is 1. If the response is reduced the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The reviewer is correct. Due to the pandemic the course of this study was dramatically changed. Initially there was going to be 2 separate protocols the first to measure cornea sensitivity using a hyperosmotic solution in 3 groups control, and diabetes with or without neuropathy. The second protocol was to be treatment with fish oil to determine whether improvement occurs. Because of COVID we were able to complete only protocol 1 and it was done in only control and diabetes neuropathy subjects.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Type 2 Diabetes With Neuropathy
Subjects with type 2 diabetes will be enrolled and determination if they have neuropathy will be determined from their clinical record and evaluation.
28
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of Diabetes
Healthy, aged matched control subjects will be enrolled and determination if they have neuropathy will be determined from their clinical record and evaluation.
16
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicType 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyNormal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants2 Participants17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Age, Continuous66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
cornea sensitivity using Cochet-Bonnet5.68 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47
5.95 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14
5.78 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41
cornea sensitivity using isotonic solution0.089 time ratio eyelids closed vs. open
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.012
0.085 time ratio eyelids closed vs. open
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.027
0.088 time ratio eyelids closed vs. open
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.01
Dry eye (DEQ 5) questionnaire7.12 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
2.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31
5.26 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.31
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants15 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Michigan neuropathy screening instrument5.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52
0.54 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03
3.84 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.68
nerve amplitude3.80 uV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.39
14.63 uV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.86
7.74 uV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.98
nerve conduction35.6 m/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
50.5 m/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
41.0 m/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire11.36 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
1.09 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59
7.63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants15 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 Participants16 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants11 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 280 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Cornea Sensitivity

Cornea sensitivity to a isotonic and hyperosmotic solution is evaluated as the amount of time the eyelid is closed over a period of 150 seconds following application of first isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) followed by Muro 128 (5% NaCl solution) after a 5 minute recovery/washout period. The evaluation is done from analyzing the recordings of each event using a multi-camera video platform. The results are reported for response to saline (baseline) and Muro (stimulant) solutions as a ratio of the time the eyelids are closed vs. open over the 150 second period of the recording.

Time frame: Examination of the response to saline and Muro 128 is preformed once in each patient immediately following their consent or if they request at a later more convenient time.

Population: primary outcome

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyCornea Sensitivity0.177 time ratio of eyelids closed vs. openStandard Deviation 0.073
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesCornea Sensitivity0.293 time ratio of eyelids closed vs. openStandard Deviation 0.036
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet Filament

This test records the mechanical sensitivity of the cornea to a filament that is touched to the cornea. The rigidity of the filament can be adjusted and the outcome is the length of the filament (6 to 1 cm) when the subjects blinks. The data will be recorded as cm.

Time frame: Done once to determine whether there is a difference between control and diabetes subjects with peripheral neuropathy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyChange in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet Filament5.683 cmStandard Error 0.066
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesChange in Corneal Sensation Threshold Using Cochet Bonnet Filament5.953 cmStandard Error 0.026
p-value: <0.0025t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Determination of Tibial Nerve Conduction Velocity

This is a non-invasive method of determining conduction velocity of the tibial nerve. the scale is meters per second or m/s. The subject will be instructed to lie down on a examination table with shoes and socks removed. Afterwards, the lower ankle will be swabbed with an alcohol patch and allowed to air dry. A device containing 2 posts (about 3 inches apart) will be placed on the lower ankle in the region of the Achilles and activated. For a period of 5-10 sec the device sends a pulse stimulating the nerve distally (post located at the lower part of the ankle) and the response recorded by the post located distally on the skin of the upper part of the ankle. The nerve conduction is recorded electronically by the device and data down loaded to a secured computer. During the time of the analyses the subject will feel dual pulsating sensation that will last up to 10 sec.

Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyDetermination of Tibial Nerve Conduction Velocity35.60 m/sStandard Error 4.19
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesDetermination of Tibial Nerve Conduction Velocity50.50 m/sStandard Error 3.68
p-value: <0.0195t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

All subjects will answer a 15 question survey that relates to symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. The score range is 0-13 with the higher score indicating poorer outcome or increased peripheral neuropathy.

Time frame: Done once as part of the determination to the subjects peripheral neuropathy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyMichigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument5.720 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0505
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesMichigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument0.5455 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3123
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Presence of Reflex

Reflex testing is commonly used to detect sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients. The ankle reflex is examined by aligning the subjects ankle into a neutral position and the examiner strikes the Achilles tendon with a neurological hammer. An abnormal result is recorded if the subject does not display any ankle plantarflexion. The scale is 0 to 1. If the reflex is present the score given is 0. If no reflex is present the score given is 1. If the response is reduced the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.

Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyPresence of Reflex0.8125 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07855
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesPresence of Reflex0.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Presence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great Toe

Vibratory sensation is a standard of care test used with patients with diabetes to test sensory nerve sensation. A 128 Hz tuning fork is used and placed over the dorsum of the great toe on the boney prominence of the distal interphalangeal joint. The subject is asked to tell the examiner if they feel the object touching their toe. This is repeated 3 times. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the object the score given is 0. If the subject fails to feel the object all 3 times the score is 1. If they feel it once or twice during the examination the score given is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.

Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyPresence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great Toe0.6731 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0551
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesPresence of Vibratory Sensation of the Great Toe0.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Questionnaires for Corneal Sensitivity

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI contains 12 questions relating to eye sensitivity to light, vision acuity, dryness, sensitivity when reading, using the computer, and watching TV). The OSDI is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.

Time frame: Done once to determine extent of common eye disease such as dry eye

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyQuestionnaires for Corneal Sensitivity11.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.96
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesQuestionnaires for Corneal Sensitivity1.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
p-value: <0.0017t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Sensitivity to 10 g Monofilament Test

The 10 g monofilament test is a routine evaluation used to screen the diabetic foot for loss of sensory sensation and part of the standard of care for any diabetic patient. The subject will remove their footwear and lie down on a table. The filament will be applied perpendicular to the skin surface on the bottom of the feet will sufficient force to allow the filament to bend. This is repeated 5 times. Each subject will be asked to tell the examiner if they feel it. The scale is 0 to 1. If the subject feels the monofilament the value each time the score given is 0. If there is no feeling the value is 1. For reduced sensitivity, for example feels the monofilament 2 or 3 times during the test the score is 0.5. A higher score is evidence of peripheral neuropathy.

Time frame: Done once as a determination of the presence of peripheral neuropathy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathySensitivity to 10 g Monofilament Test0.5577 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07507
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesSensitivity to 10 g Monofilament Test0.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Visual Acuity

A routine visual acuity eye examination will be performed. Subjects vision will be measured by having the subject read the smallest letters on an eye chart with their glasses or best correction. Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the ability of the eye to distinguish shapes and the details of objects at a given distance (20 feet). A person with normal vision scores 20/20 as did all our controls. A person with 20/40 vision sees things at 20 feet that most people who don't need vision correction can see at 40 feet. Our subjects with diabetic neuropathy mean score was 20/25. The first number in the score is the number of feet for the test and this is commonly 20 feet. The second number is their visualization of the letters on the eye chart. The investigators used the mean of the second number for analysis. This takes about 5 minutes or less.

Time frame: Done once to determine the subjects visual ability

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Type 2 Diabetes With NeuropathyVisual Acuity25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.001
Normal Subjects, Aged Match With no Symptoms of DiabetesVisual Acuity20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026