Skip to content

Mechanisms and Innovations in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Evaluation of Mechanisms and Innovations in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04221763
Acronym
MIC
Enrollment
47
Registered
2020-01-09
Start date
2019-10-15
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2023-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Left Bundle-Branch Block, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction, Non-Specific Intraventricular Conduction Defect, Right Bundle-Branch Block

Keywords

Cardiac resynchronization therapy, His bundle pacing, Haemodynamics, ECGI

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of multiple modalities of cardiac resynchronisation therapy using high precision acute electrical and haemodynamic measurements.These modalities include biventricular pacing and conduction system pacing utilising His bundle and left bundle pacing. Conduction system pacing is a more physiological form of pacing. The study hypothesises that this will produce more effective cardiac resynchronisation.

Detailed description

This is a single centre acute electrical/haemodynamic and observational study of a subgroup of patients with heart failure. A total of 60 will be recruited. The acute study involves within patient comparison of biventricular and conduction system pacing using detailed electrical mapping and high precision haemodynamic measurement protocol. Participants will have permanent conduction system pacing if; * Baseline left bundle branch block and QRS \> 140ms or QRS \>150ms and any QRS morphology AND * Conduction system pacing is successful at reducing QRS duration by 20ms or more with satisfactory pacing parameters. Participants who receive permanent conduction system pacing will have follow up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Non-invasive markers including mechanical activation pattern (echocardiography and cardiac MRI) and electrical activation pattern (ultra-high frequency electrocardiography) will be used to identify the characteristics of patients who benefit from conduction system pacing.

Interventions

DEVICEHis-bundle pacing.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy can be achieved using biventricular pacing involving placement of three leads into the right atrium, right ventricle and coronary sinus (epicardial left ventricle). Alternatively the third lead may be placed at the bundle of His or left ventricular septum to pace the left bundle directly.

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

60 patients with heart failure, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and cardiac conduction abnormality (QRS \> 120ms) will be recruited and undergo an attempt at His bundle, left bundle pacing and biventricular pacing. Patients will have acute haemodynamic and electrical measurements.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients referred for conventional CRT * Severe heart failure (LVEF, a measure of heart pumping, \< 35% - severe) * Prolonged QRS duration (\>120ms) * Adults willing to take part (age \> 18 years) * Able to give consent

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to give consent * Children (age \< 18 years) * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute change is systolic blood pressure20 minutesMean change in systolic blood pressure (mmHg) from atrial pacing to AV sequential CRT pacing (HBP, LBP, epiBVP and combined HPB with epiLVP) at optimal AV delay measured in mmHg.
Acute electrical measurements20 minutesMean change in left ventricular activation time (Milliseconds) (measured using ECGI) during AV sequential CRT pacing (HBP, LBP, epiBVP and combined HPB with epiLVP) at optimal AV delay measured in Milliseconds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart failure symptoms6 monthsHeart failure symptoms of patients with permanent conduction system leads will be assessed at follow up at 3 month, 6 months and 12 months. The symptoms will be assessed using the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire score.
Conduction system battery longevity6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months.The measurements include battery longevity measured in months.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing6 monthsPatients with permanent conduction system leads will undergo symptom assessment with a repeat cardio-pulmonary exercise test to measure MVO2 in litres/minute.
Left ventricular ejection fraction12 monthsPatients with permanent conduction system leads will undergo a repeat echocardiography and measure their left ventricular ejection fraction.
Conduction system lead threshold6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months.The measurements include lead threshold to achieved QRS narrowing measured in Volts at 0.5ms and 1ms.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026