Skip to content

The Effect of Using Two Different Suturing Techniques on Free Gingival Marginal Stability

The Effect of Using Two Different Suturing Techniques on Free Gingival Marginal Stability After Esthetic Crown Lengthening for Treatment of Gummy Smile (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04219436
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-01-07
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2019-11-01
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Altered Passive Eruption of Teeth

Keywords

esthetic crown lengthening, suturing technique, vertical mattress suturing technique, figure of eight suturing technique, tissue rebound, supracrestal gingival tissue, free gingival margin

Brief summary

Gummy smile is one of the major esthetic problems nowadays; it is due to several causes that either dental or skeletal. Etiology of the gummy smile is altered passive eruption, vertical maxillary excess, different gingival enlargement conditions, deficient maxillary lip length and excessive maxillary lip mobility, dento alveolar extrusion, combination of all these factors. Altered passive eruption is considered to be one of the most major causes, it is classified into two types according to the location of the mucogingival junction with respect to the bone crest and each type has two subtypes . Esthetic crown lengthening is the treatment of choice for subtype B in both types as bone removal is mandatory to create a space for the biological width. Most of the studies stated that there is some degree of relapse of the gingival tissues after the procedures in the follow ups, that relapse was related to the biotype of the gingival tissues, the flap placement close or far from the bone can be correlated to the suturing technique used for closure of the tissues. In the investigator's study comparing of two different suturing technique was done to evaluated their effect on gingival tissue relapse, 30 patients (26 females and 4 males) were divided between 2 groups each group consisted of 15 patients. In the first group periosteal suturing technique was done in the second figure of eight (modified interrupted) suturing technique was. Evaluation of the tissue relapse was done through the assessment of the amount of the attached gingival tissues level of gingival margin and marginal tissue contour before and after the surgery. The results of the study showed that tissue relapse was more in the periosteal suturing technique group that was related to the pressure on the tissues due to the fixation of the suture at the periostium, the papillary tissue also showed more inflammation in the follow up period prior to suture removal. The figure of eight group showed less relapse and tissue inflammation as it prevents flap edge overlap and is tension free therefore better blood supply to the tissue. Patients were generally satisfied post-surgical with their smile, gingival tissue visibility and teeth dimensions inspite of the relapse but it was better than prior to surgery. Also they would recommend it to other patients complaining from the same problem.

Detailed description

Thirty patients (26 females, 4 males), who were candidates for esthetic crown lengthening, participated in this prospective clinical trial. Group I (15 patients) (vertical mattress suturing technique) : Esthetic crown lengthening procedure: internal bevel, sulcular and interdental incisions, flap elevation, bone removal then External vertical mattress suture was done (periosteal suture). Group II (15 patients) (Figure of eight suturing technique) : Esthetic crown lengthening procedure: internal bevel, sulcular and interdental incisions, flap elevation, bone removal then modified interrupted suture was done (Figure of eight suture).

Interventions

PROCEDUREvertical mattress suturing technique

vertical mattress suturing technique used for flap closure after esthetic crown lengthening

PROCEDUREfigure of eight suturing technique

figure of eight suturing technique used for flap closure after esthetic crown lengthening

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The study consisted of two groups the number of patient was determined by sample size calculation through G power analysis (15 patients). Patients were randomly selected using computer generated randomization (www.randomizer.org).

Intervention model description

2 arms undergoing the same surgical procedure but with different suturing techniques for flap closure

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients complaining from gummy smile (altered passive eruption) * Bone level is 2 mm or less from the cemento enamel junction * Teeth included were free from any periodontal destruction * Good compliance with the plaque control instructions following initial therapy. * Availability for follow up and maintenance program

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of systemic diseases which could influence the outcome of the therapy (American society of anesthesiologists I, ASA I). * Patient suffering from periodontitis stage 4 grade c. * Presence of smoking habit. * Presence of occlusion interference. * Pregnant females and lactating females. . * Vulnerable groups of patients (handicapped, mentally retarded, prisoners). * Restored teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
evaluation of the marginal soft tissue levels rebound6 monthsdetermination of soft tissue rebound: is measured as the difference between (the level of free gingival margin after suturing) and (the level of the free gingival margin 6 months post surgical) both measured from fixed reference point on the stent to the free gingival margin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Supracrestal gingival tissue6 monthsthe difference between the bone level and the free gingival margin (measured from a fixed reference point on the stent)
Patient satisfactionat 6 months post surgicalquestionnaire (After surgery) * Is the patient satisfied with the gingival display during talking and smiling, teeth display during talking and smiling (not at all, slightly, somewhat, very and extremely). * How was the procedure experience (much worse, worse, same as I thought, better and much better).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026