Skip to content

A Comparison Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

A Comparison of Short-term and Long- Term Outcomes Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04217239
Enrollment
272
Registered
2020-01-03
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2026-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer

Keywords

Thoracoscopic, laparoscopic, esophagectomy

Brief summary

Surgery is still the main treatment for esophageal cancer, however, the complication and mortality rate of open esophagectomy is high. As a result, the thoracoscopic- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was developed. The MIE mainly comprised two surgical approaches: MIE McKeown approach (cervical anastomosis) and MIE Ivor-Lewis approach (intrathoracicanastomosis). The MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis) is increasingly used for the treatment of mid and lower esophageal cancers. Our study is trying to compare the safety, feasibility, and short-term and long- term outcomes between MIE Ivor-Lewis approach and MIE McKeown approach for the treatment of lower thoracic esophageal cancer and esophageal- gastric junction.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMIE Ivor- Lewis

minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis

PROCEDUREMIE McKeown

minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with cervical anastomosis

Sponsors

The Second Hospital of Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(I) Patients with clinically staged T1-3N0-2M0 tumors; good cardiopulmonary function; (II) Patients with lower thoracic esophageal tumors and esophageal- gastric junction tumor; (III) Patients without a previous history of cancer; (IV) Patients without a previous history of neck or chest surgery;

Exclusion criteria

(I) cardiopulmonary function not good enough for surgery; (II) Patients with hybrid MIE

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall postoperative complicationswithin one monthOverall postoperative complication rates

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operating time1 dayOperating time in minutes
Lymph nodes harvested1 dayLymph nodes harvested in number
Blood loss1 dayBlood loss in milliliter
Anastomotic leakwithin one monthAnastomotic leak in rate
Pulmonary complication1 monthPulmonary complication in rate
Anastomotic stenosiswithin three monthsAnastomotic stenosis in rate
recurrent laryngeal nerve injurywithin three monthsrecurrent laryngeal nerve injury in rate
Chylothoraxwithin one monthChylothorax in rate
Cardiac arrhythmiawithin one monthCardiac arrhythmia in rate
Laboratory findingswithin 3 daysThree-day postoperative laboratory findings including ALB, PA, Glob, etc.
Hospital staywithin 60 daysHospital stay in days
mortalitywithin 30 and 90 daysmortality in rate
progression-free survivalwithin 5 yearsprogression-free survival in rate

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026