Skip to content

Milk Matters in Malnutrition, is it the Lactose or Dairy Protein?

Milk Matters in Malnutrition, is it the Lactose or Dairy Protein?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04216043
Enrollment
1102
Registered
2020-01-02
Start date
2020-09-16
Completion date
2022-03-07
Last updated
2024-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malnutrition, Child

Brief summary

This study is to look at the types of sugar and protein composition in the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition and its effects on gut health. The study will use 4 different types of ready to use supplementary foods to see which one if any has better recovery rate along with looking into the gut health. Children will be treated using one food for up to 12 weeks. A subset of about 400 will be tested for intestinal permeability using the dual sugar test.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTRUSF skimmed milk powder

ready-to-use supplementary foods 75 kcal/kg/day (314 kJ/kg/day) and full daily doses of vitamins and micronutrients

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTRUSF milk protein concentrate and sucrose

ready-to-use supplementary foods 75 kcal/kg/day (314 kJ/kg/day) and full daily doses of vitamins and micronutrients

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTRUSF soy protein and whey permeate

ready-to-use supplementary foods 75 kcal/kg/day (314 kJ/kg/day) and full daily doses of vitamins and micronutrients

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTRUSF soy and sucrose

ready-to-use supplementary foods 75 kcal/kg/day (314 kJ/kg/day) and full daily doses of vitamins and micronutrients

Sponsors

Project Peanut Butter, Sierra Leone
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The RUSF food products are very similar in appearance and texture; thus, subjects and caretakers will be blinded. The investigators making the clinical assessments will not have information as to specialized food product assignment of the subject, and will remain blinded.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 59 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* MUAC \< 12.5 cm and ≥ 11.5 cm without bipedal oedema

Exclusion criteria

* If they are involved in another research trial * in another supplemental feeding program * debilitating illness * history of peanut or milk allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% lactulose excretion after 4 weeks of supplementary feeding4 weeksThis will only be assessed in children with higher-risk (MUAC \< 12 cm) MAM at baseline. %L measured in the urine relative to the amount ingested will be calculated. %L will be categorized as normal (\<0.2%) and abnormal (\>0.2)
16S rRNA relative abundance of bacterial taxa after 4 weeks of supplementary feeding4 weeksThis will only be assessed in children with higher-risk (MUAC \< 12 cm) MAM at baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Final mid-upper arm circumferenceup to 12 weeks of treatmentUse the mid-upper are circumference at the visit when outcome was reached
Proportion with %L < 0.204 weeksPercentage of children with %L excreted \< 0.20
16S rRNA beta-diversity at week 44 weeksLooking at the 16S configuration in stool samples collected
16S rRNA alpha-diversity at week 44 weeksSeveral metrics of alpha diversity will be assessed, including Shannon's index
Rate of weight gain (g/kg/d)up to 12 weeks of treatmentChanges in weight relative to baseline weight
Rate of deteriorating to severe acute malnutrition or deathup to 12 weeks of treatmentSevere acute malnutrition defined by MUAC \< 11.5 cm or development of nutritional edema
Sub-group analysis of %L and 16S rRNA outcomes among children not receiving breastfeeding at baseline vs. those being breastfeed at baseline4 weeksAnthropometric, %L and 16s rRNA outcomes (relative abundance, alpha-diversity, beta-diversity) will be compared between study foods among those who are reported to be breastfeeding vs. those who are not
Sub-group analysis of anthropometric outcomes among children with MUAC < 12 cm vs. >= 12 cm at baselineup to 12 weeks of treatmentRate of weight change, length change, final MUAC, recovery, SAM, and death will be compared between the study foods among children with baseline MUAC \< vs. \>=12 cm.
Metabolomic feature abundance in the 4 dietary groupsAfter 4 weeks of supplementary feedingMetabolomic feature abundance in the 4 dietary groups, as determined by untargeted metabolomics in 200 randomly selected children with MUAC \< 12.1 cm on enrollment
Rate of recovery from moderate acute malnutritionup to 12 weeks of treatmentRecovery is when a participant reaches a Mid-Upper Arm Circumference of 12.5cm or better
Rate of length gain (mm/week)up to 12 weeks of treatmentChanges in linear growth

Countries

Sierra Leone

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026