Critically Ill, Hemodynamic Instability
Conditions
Keywords
Critically Ill patients, blood pressure, vital signs, non-invasive monitoring, Vasopressor support
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic monitoring using the invasive PiCCO device to the BB-613PW wireless, non-invasive PPG-based device, in critically ill patients within the ICU, suffering from hemodynamic instability and in need of vasopressor support. Data will be gathered prospectively and analysed retrospectively.
Interventions
Comparing the PiCCO monitor to the non-invasive BB-613PW device in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients in the ICU
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* ICU adult patients in the need of vasopressor support of more than 0.2 mcg/Kg/Min for a period longer than 3 hours * Patients in which PiCCO monitoring is needed
Exclusion criteria
* Refusal of the subject * Technical difficulties in insertion of the PiCCO catheters * Significant cardiac arrhythmias * Significant valvular disease * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Level of accordance between the BB-613PW to the PiCCO | 72 hours per individual | We will compare the level of accordance of blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, heart rate variability, and systemic vascular resistance. |
Countries
Israel