Skip to content

Baerveldt (BGI) Valve Versus Ahmed(AGV) Valve in Management of Difficult Glaucoma Cases

Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant Versus Ahmed Glaucoma Implant in One- Year Follow up, Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04215575
Enrollment
81
Registered
2020-01-02
Start date
2014-01-01
Completion date
2016-12-20
Last updated
2020-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, Glaucoma, Neovascular, Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Glaucoma Secondary

Brief summary

Refractory glaucoma is a difficult subject as many glaucoma devices attempt to reduce IOP. Baerveldt implant is considered as a large implant, and, on the contrary, Ahmed implant is considered a small implant as many comparisons have showed. Investigators have previously used two models S2 and FP7 Ahmed implant. Currently, investigators use Baerveldt implant in refractory glaucoma cases in order to compare it with the Ahmed implant.

Detailed description

Eighty-one participants with glaucoma after ocular surgery or secondary glaucoma with persistent and uncontrolled IOP \> 21 mmHg were randomized for placement of Baerveldt implant or Ahmed implant models using a standardized surgical technique. The primary outcome was failure, which was defined as IOP \>16 mmHg with glaucoma medication on 2 consecutive study visits. Secondary outcomes were IOP, medication use, visual acuity, complications, and interventions.

Interventions

DEVICEglaucoma implant procedure (Baerveldt)

A 350 mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implant was placed in the superotemporal quadrant in 25 patients randomized to BGI group. A limbus-based conjunctival flap was dissected, and the implant was sutured to sclera 10 mm posterior to the limbus. A scleral graft was used to cover the limbal portion of the tube, and the conjunctiva was closed.

DEVICEglaucoma implant procedure (Ahmed)

A 184 mm2 Ahmed glaucoma implant was placed in the superotemporal quadrant in 56 patients randomized to AGV group. A fornix-based conjunctival flap was dissected, and the implant was sutured to sclera 10 mm posterior to the limbus. The Ahmed tube left patent and viscoelastic substance injected into anterior chamber. A scleral graft was used to cover the limbal portion of the tube, and the conjunctiva was closed.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

A clinical trial design strategy in which parties involved in the trial, the investigator and participants, do not know which participants have been assigned which interventions. Type of masking include: double-blind masking.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized to BGI model 101-350 placement (BGI group) or an AGV model FP7or S2 placement (AGV group). Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure that defined as IOP \>16 mmHg or less than a 20% reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive study visits.The IOP, the use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), visual fields, bleb morphology and rates of surgical complications were secondary outcome measures.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1 - patients with glaucoma who underwent a previous failed trabeculectomy or other intraocular surgery. 2- patients who had secondary glaucoma and are known to have a high failure rate with trabeculectomy such as neovascular, uveitis, or iridocorneal endothelial syndrome-associated glaucoma, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1 - patients lacked light perception, unwilling or unable to give informed consent, were expected to be unavailable for follow-up visits. 2-had previous aqueous shunt implanted in the same eye, other external impediment to supero-temporal drainage device implantation. 3- presence of silicone oil, vitreous in the anterior chamber sufficient to require a vitrectomy. 4-uveitis associated with a systemic condition like juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, nanophthalmos, Sturge-Weber syndrome or other conditions associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IOPone year follow upmean IOPs
glaucoma medicationsone year follow upmean number of glaucoma medications

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
visual acuityone year follow uplog MAR Snellen median and interquartile Range values

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026