Skip to content

Hypertonic Saline Enhances The Field of View of Clinicians and Ease of Procedures

Hypertonic Saline Enhances The Field of View of Clinicians and Ease of Procedures: A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Intranasal Hypertonic Saline, Xylometazoline, Lidocaine, and Isotonic Saline

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04214938
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-01-02
Start date
2016-02-01
Completion date
2019-01-01
Last updated
2020-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasopharyngeal Diseases

Keywords

hypertonic saline solutions, lidocaine, oxymetazoline, isotonic saline, discomfort

Brief summary

Transnasal Flexible Pharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) is one of the most common and fundamental evaluation procedures in otolaryngologist's practice, performed in both outpatient and ward settings.In the studies the desired properties for an effective topical agent to be used in patients undergoing NPL. To date, only a local anesthetic and/or decongestant substance is applied to the nostrils to relieve pain. However, to date, no studies have been performed in which intranasal hypertonic saline was used prior to nasal endoscopy.

Detailed description

NPL is a technique that has been used for more than 100 years and increases brightness, magnification and the ability to take still and video images (3). NPL is a simple, safe, cost-effective, and generally well-tolerated procedure. However, a portion of patients may refuse to allow the procedure to be repeated as they find it uncomfortable, intolerable, or painful.To date, only a local anesthetic and/or decongestant substance is applied to the nostrils to relieve pain and increase the field of view and to reduce the duration of examination and unpleasant sensations for the patient on NPL procedures.This randomised control trial was undertaken to compare the application of nasal hypertonic sea water (3.5%) with nasal lidocaine 10%, topical nasal decongestant xylometazoline 0.1% (OtrivineTM) and nasal isotonic serum physiologic as placebo group in relation to how they effectively improve the adequacy of the examination and if they reduce pain and discomfort associated with endoscopic nasal examination.

Interventions

OTHERIntranasal solutions application were done including one solution for per patient before nasoendoscopy procedure according to randomization

Hypertonic sea water, Vemcaine, Otrivine, and a placebo were applied by intranasal before the nasoendoscopy procedure for improving the field of view of clinician and reducing the patient discomfort.

Sponsors

Selcuk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

The caregiver administering the nasal spray, the subject, and the otolaryngologist carrying out nasendoscopy were all uninformed as to the type of spray employed.

Intervention model description

A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who undergone diagnostic nasal endoscopy between 2015- 2017

Exclusion criteria

* Had experienced nasal endoscopy before * Pregnant * Allergic to either xylometazoline or lidocaine * Asthma * Cardiovascular disease * Rhinitis * Severe septal deviation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of view, ease of procedure2 yearsThe primary outcome was to evaluate clinicians' field of the view according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire survey. Shortly after endoscopy, the endoscopist was asked to indicate the degree of quality of view, ease of procedure on a VAS (1: impossible to pass the endoscope, 100: excellent field of view)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-op pain2 yearsThe secondary outcome was to evaluate the patients' pain after the naso-endoscopy procedure according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire survey. Shortly after endoscopy, subjects were asked to indicate their degree of pain on a VAS (1: no pain, 100: unbearable pain).
Post-op discomfort2 yearsThe secondary outcome was to evaluate the patients' discomfort after the nasoendoscopy procedure according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire survey. Shortly after spraying each bottle, subjects were asked to indicate their degree of discomfort on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (1: no discomfort, 100: utmost discomfort). For each spray, one independent scores were obtained from each subject.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026