Skip to content

One Point Versus Two Point Fixation of Tripodal Zygomatic Fractures

One Point Versus Two Point Fixation of Tripodal Zygomatic Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04214405
Enrollment
68
Registered
2020-01-02
Start date
2020-02-01
Completion date
2021-08-04
Last updated
2022-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessment of Proper Union of Fractures

Brief summary

The zygomatic bone defines the anterior and lateral projection of the face and articulates with the frontal, sphenoid,temporal, and maxillary bones. The zygomatic complex is responsible for the protection of the orbital contents and the mid-facial contour. Fracture of the zygomatic complex is one of the most common facial injuries in maxillofacial trauma and predominately appears in young adult males. The etiology of zygomatic complex fractures primarily includes road traffic accidents, violent assaults, falls and sports injuries. The main clinical features of zygomatic complex fractures include diplopia, enophthalmos, subconjunctival ecchymosis, extraocular muscle entrapment, cosmetic deformity with depression of the malar eminence, malocclusion and neurosensory disturbances of the infraorbital nerve. Diagnosis of zygomatic complex fractures is usually clinical with confirmation by computed tomography (CT) scan. Zygomatic complex fractures with no or minimal displacement are often treated without surgical intervention, whereas fractures with functional or esthetic impairments often necessitate surgical intervention. Various surgical approaches and treatment strategies have been proposed to obtain successful treatment outcome, including the Gilles temporal approach, eyebrow, upper eyelid, transconjunctival, infraciliary lower eyelid, and intraoral vestibular approaches. The surgical approach for adequate reduction of zygomatic complex fractures must ensure a good functional and cosmetic result. Surgical reduction of zygomatic fractures by an intraoral surgical approach was first described in1909 by Keen, and several studies have subsequently documented the treatment outcome after open reduction of zygomatic complex fractures by an intraoral surgical approach.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective clinical intervention study where the admitted patients do lab investigation as CBC, coagulation profile ,Kidney function test and Imaging as CT maxillofacial with axial and coronal cuts. Patients will be assigned randomly into either one of the two groups under the study using concealed envelope. Under general anaesthesia with oral or naso-tracheal intubation, open reduction and internal fixation of tripod zygomatic fractures will be done using miniplates and screws at one point (zygomaticomaxillary area) or at two points (zygomaticomaxillary and frontozygomatic areas).

Interventions

PROCEDUREfixation of tripodal zygomatic fractures

One point versus two point fixation of tripodal zygomatic fractures

Sponsors

Mohamed Gamal Thabet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (a) Adult patients with maxillofacial fractures including tripodal zygomatic fractures as determined on clinical and radiological finding (b) Isolated tripodal fracture zygoma

Exclusion criteria

* patients with Le Fort I/II/III fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
union of fractures2 monthsassessment of proper union of fractures

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026