Skip to content

Nab-paclitaxel Versus Topotecan As Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The Efficacy and Safety of Nab-paclitaxel Versus Topotecan As Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04213937
Enrollment
386
Registered
2019-12-30
Start date
2020-01-31
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2019-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

nab-paclitaxel Topotecan

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel with topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Interventions

DRUGnab-paclitaxel

Drug: nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2, i.v. d1, d8, Repeated every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles.

DRUGTopotecan

Drug: Topotecan 1.25mg/m2/d, i.v, 1hour, d1-d5, Repeated every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles.

Sponsors

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1.18 to 75years, male or female; 2.Histological or pathological diagnosis of small cell lung caner; 3.Progression or relapse after first-line chemotherapy, extensive disease; 4.ECOG performance status of 0-2; 5.Life expectancy of 3 months or more; 6.Patient must be accessible for treatment and follow-up; 7.For women of child-bearing age, the pregnancy test results (serum or urine) within 72 hours before enrolment must be negative. They will take appropriate methods for contraception during the study; 8.Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. symptomatic brain metastases; 2. Uncontrolled serious medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect the ability of the subject to receive the study regimen, such as concomitant serious medical conditions, including severe heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled infection, active peptic ulcer, etc.; 3. Have dementia, altered mental state or any mental illness that would prevent understanding or informed consent or fill out questionnaires; 4. Received any investigational drug within 30 days of the planned first dose of this study treatment. 5. Prior Grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy(according to (NCI CTCAE), version 5.0); 6. Known to be hypersensitive, highly sensitive, or intolerant to study-related medications or their excipients; 7. Have malignant tumors in the past 5 years, except for clinically cured basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, local prostate cancer after radical operation, and ductal carcinoma in situ after radical operation; 8. Bone marrow function: Neutrophils \< 1.5×109/L, platelets \< 100×109/L, hemoglobin \< 90 g/L; Hepatic and renal function: Serum creatinine \> 1.5×ULN; AST and ALT \> 2.5×ULN or \> 5×ULN in the presence of hepatic metastasis; Total bilirubin \>1.5×ULN; 9. Patients need other anti-tumor drugs; 10. Known HIV, hepatitis B/C virus positive ; 11. The researchers considered the patients who were not suitable for enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival (OS)1 years post treatmentOS was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of trial regimen to the date of death from any cause (event) or last follow-up (censored data).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survival (PFS)1 yearsThe time from treatment to tumor progression or death
Objective response rate (ORR)1 yearsResponse evaluation disease progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) criteria. Response (PR), refers to the number of cases with complete and partial response after treatment as a percentage of the total number of evaluable cases.
Adverse events (AE)3 yearsAdverse events (AE) were monitored on an ongoing basis and classified according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 5.0. Patients were assessed for toxicities before each administration, and toxicity was graded accordingly

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJie MD Wang, PhD
wangjiezgyxkxy@163.com86 13910704669

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026