Skip to content

Effect of Palatable Lidocaine Gel on Gag Reflex for Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Effect of Palatable Lidocaine Gel Versus Dexmedetomidine on Gag Reflex During Propofol Based Sedation for Patients Undergoing Elective Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04213833
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-12-30
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2020-06-01
Last updated
2020-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastro-Intestinal Disorder

Keywords

palatable lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, gag reflex, gastrointestinal endoscopy

Brief summary

* The development of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) has greatly expanded the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities of gastroenterologists. The patient's tolerance to procedure and endoscopist's satisfaction increase when sedation is used along with topical pharyngeal anesthesia. * Numerous agents are available for moderate sedation in endoscopy such as propofol, midazolam, ketamine, fentanyl and dexmedetomidine, the choice of a particular sedative agent depends on its availability, cost and experience of the endoscopist and patient with that sedative agent. However, these i.v. anesthetics may be associated with complications especially in elderly patients or in those with other comorbidities, as apnea, hypoxia, hypotension, and paradoxical agitation, in which the patient becomes agitated rather than sleepy from the sedation, leading to increased morbidity and the duration of the patient's hospitalization. * Local application of lidocaine to the oral cavity and the oropharynx, will attenuate or even abolish the gag reflex increasing the patient's comfort thus decreasing the dose of i.v. anesthetics with their potential complications. * Up to our knowledge, there is no study done to evaluate the effect of palatable lidocaine gel versus I .v dexmedetomidine on the incidence of gag reflex and total propofol consumption during elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Detailed description

Upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy (UGIE) is a valuable procedure that is commonly used for the diagnosis of possible causes of upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) symptoms such as bleeding, pain, dysphagia, recurrent vomiting and reflux. Moreover, it is a safe and easy procedure for taking biopsy samples for suspected esophageal, gastric and duodenal diseases, grading and even ligating varices \[1, 2\]. UGIE is widely performed under propofol sedation that considered a safe sedation technique and alleviates the sympathetic response to the procedure. However, gag reflex and retching still exist in approximately 29% of those patients despite being under propofol sedation \[3\]. Any further trial of deepening sedation in order to minimize gagging may compromise hemodynamics and cause respiratory depression. These complications add to the overall costs as it increases morbidity and duration of patients' hospitalization. On the other hand, continued gag reflex could affect the safety of the procedure, patient's tolerance and endoscopist's satisfaction \[4\]. Dexmedetomidine, a short-acting selective α2-agonist, has been used frequently as a sedoanalgesic in many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures \[5\]. It provides unique sedative activity not present in conventional sedatives so it is unlikely to cause restlessness or respiratory depression was seen with Gaba aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists such as propofol. Therefore it minimizes physical and emotional distress and enhances successful completion of the procedure without remarkable gag reflex \[6\]. However, many clinicians may have qualms regarding the safety profile of dexmedetomidine usage in such endoscopic procedures due to its well known hemodynamic side effects (especially bradycardia and hypotension) \[7\]. Topical pharyngeal anesthesia(TPA) has been used to avoid such complications resulting from deepening sedation through increase i.v anesthetic doses of propofol or adjuvants that may be used as dexmedetomidine. TPA is preferred in many centers, particularly for diagnostic endoscopy \[8, 9\]. Lidocaine is widely used for TPA. The spray, gel and inhaler forms of it are commercially available. However, application of lidocaine gel to the oral cavity and the oropharynx, especially the base of the tongue, palate, uvula, palatopharyngeal, palatoglossal folds and posterior pharyngeal wall will attenuate or even abolish the gag reflex while introducing the UGIE, thus increasing the patient's comfort and tolerance to the procedure and decreasing the dose of i.v. anesthetics with their potential complications \[10, 11\]. Palatable lidocaine gel is a local anesthetic that stabilizes the neuronal membrane through hindering the ionic fluxes that initiate and transmit impulses, thereby giving a local anesthetic action. It is a safe, well-tolerated and quite promising TPA particularly in elderly patients and in patients with comorbidities in office-based endoscopy \[12\]. We hypothesize that the usage of topical palatable lidocaine gel may have an impact on decreasing the incidence of gag reflex and total propofol consumption during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Interventions

patients will be sedated with 50 mg propofol(10 mg/ml) given slowly intravenously over 1 min

DRUGDexmedetomidine [Precedex]

patients will received 0.5 mcg/ kg dexmedetomidine intravenously followed by syringe containing 50 mg propofol(10 mg/ml).

DRUGPalatable Lidocaine Topical Gel

15 g of palatable lidocaine gel will be gradually applied 3-5 min before the endoscopy at three consecutive 30-s intervals to the base of the tongue, the palate and the peritonsillar areas and the patients will be informed to spread it within their mouth with their tongue and swallow it later to cover the oropharynx and esophagus. Patients will be asked to register the onset of numbness, then patient will receive syringe containing 50 mg propofol (10 mg/ml) intravenously as a sedation.

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

participant and endoscopist

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient acceptance. Age 21-60 years old of either sex. BMI \< 30 kg/m2 ASA I and ASA II. scheduled for elective upper GIT endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* History of clinically significant cardiovascular, respiratory diseases (as obstructive sleep apnea, severe COPD or asthma) History of psychiatric disease History of allergy to any of the study drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gag reflexthrough endoscopic procedure up to one hourwill be assessed as ''present or not when a vomiting like response will provoked upon introduction of the endoscope.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
heart rateevery 2 min for the first 10 min of the procedure, then every 5 min till the end of the procedure.Intraoperative hemodynamics
mean blood pressureevery 2 min for the first 10 min of the procedure, then every 5 min till the end of the procedure.Intraoperative hemodynamics
Patient's satisfaction regarding discomfort (gagging and pain)2 hours post the procedurewill be assessed using numerical rating scale from 1 to 10 (1=satisfied and tolerated well the procedure to 10=unsatisfied)
Endoscopist's satisfaction regarding gagging and difficulty of performing the procedurethrough endoscopic procedure up to one hourusing numerical rating scale from 1 to 10 (1=no gagging/difficulty to 10=maximum gagging/ difficulty)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026