Chronic Kidney Diseases
Conditions
Keywords
eHealth, self-management, chronic kidney disease
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to develop an evidence-based tailored eHealth self-management intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease in China, and test the impact on implementation and effectiveness of interventions.
Detailed description
Interventions that support disease self-management (further referred to as 'self-management interventions') can have a significant impact on the health and quality of life of patients suffering from chronic conditions in general and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in specific. In the last decade, the use of electronic health (eHealth) technology in self-management interventions has become more and more popular. EHealth-based self-management interventions have been shown to improve health-related outcomes, such as blood pressure (BP) control and medication adherence, and found to be feasible and acceptable for CKD patients and care professionals. Hence, the use of eHealth self-management interventions for CKD patients has become increasingly popular. Knowledge of the implementation and effectivity of such interventions in China and other developing countries is, however, still lacking. Researchers from the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) developed 'Medical Dashboard', an eHealth intervention to help support and involve CKD patients in their disease self-management. We aim to tailor the evidence-based Dutch intervention 'Medical Dashboard' to the Chinese context and evaluate its implementation process and effectiveness.
Interventions
Before the start of the intervention, chronic kidney disease patients and care providers will receive a face-to-face training session on the use of Medical Dashboard. To avoid contamination, Medical Dashboard will only be made accessible for participants in the intervention group via a secure password-protected registration process.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients: (1) aged over 18 years old; (2) diagnosis of chronic kidney disease; (3) Chinese speaking. * Health care providers who work in the Department of Nephrology
Exclusion criteria
* Individuals unable to participate due to physical or mental disabilities. * Individuals unable to write or read.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of chronic kidney disease self-management behavior using Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management (CKD-SM) instrument | 0 month (baseline), 9 months after randomisation (endpoint) | The Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management (CKD-SM) instrument with 29 items uses a four-point likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (always) to measure subjects' self-management behavior. Possible scores range from 29 to 116 points, with higher scores indicating better self-management behavior |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of number of complications patients | 0 month (baseline), 9 months after randomisation (endpoint) | Change of number of complications patients |
| Change of chronic kidney disease self-efficacy using Chronic Kidney Disease Self-efficacy (CKD-SE) scale | 0 month (baseline), 9 months after randomisation (endpoint) | The Chronic Kidney Disease Self-efficacy (CKD-SE) scale is a 25-item self-administered scale that measures subjects' confidence. Responses range from no confidence (0) to the highest degree of confidence (10). Possible scores range from 0 to 250 points, with higher scores indicating greater levels of confidence |
| Change of chronic kidney disease illness perception using Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) | 0 month (baseline), 9 months after randomisation (endpoint) | The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) is a nine-item scale designed to rapidly assess the cognitive and emotional representations of illness. This scale consists of eight items related to illness perception. In addition, patients are asked to identify the three most important factors that they believe have caused their illness. All of the items except the causal question are rated using a 0 to 10 response scale. Higher scores indicate stronger perceptions along that dimension. The scores of items 3, 4, and 7 are calculated and expressed as reverse scores in this scale. Possible scores range from 0 to 80 points, with higher scores indicating a more threatening view of the illness |
| Change of chronic kidney disease anxiety and depression status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 0 month (baseline), 9 months after randomisation (endpoint) | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is used to determine the levels of anxiety and depression that a person is experiencing. It is a fourteen item scale that generates ordinal data. Seven items measure symptoms of anxiety and seven items measure symptoms of depression . Each item is coded from 0 to 3. Possible scores range from 0 to 21 points for sub-scale on anxiety or depression, with higher scores indicating greater levels of burden of anxiety or depression |
| Change of chronic kidney disease quality of life using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item short-form survey (KDQOL-36) from baseline to 9 months after randomization | 0 month (baseline), 9 months after randomisation (endpoint) | The Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item short-form survey (KDQOL-36) is used to evaluate the health-related quality of life. It has 36 items. Possible scores range from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life |
Countries
China
Contacts
Guangzhou Medical University