Skip to content

Empowering Health: Acute Psychological Effects of an Electromyostimulation-Whole-Body-Workout

Empowering Health: Acute Psychological Effects of a Single Electromyostimulation-Whole-Body-Workout in Participants With Depression

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04211493
Enrollment
34
Registered
2019-12-26
Start date
2019-11-22
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Physical Activity, Physical Exercise, Mental Disorder, Depression, Mental Health, Health Behaviour, Electromyostimulation, EMS, Strength Training

Brief summary

The study investigates the acute psychological effects of a whole-body-workout using Electromyostimulation (EMS) in participants with depression and healthy individuals.

Detailed description

EMS-whole-body-workouts are less time-consuming and effort-intensive but generate physical effects which are comparable to conventional strength training. Therefore EMS could lower the barrier to physical activity. The present study focusses on acute psychological effects of an EMS workout - especially with regard to the reduction of depressive symptoms. Physical activity is notably important for patients with depression and shows multiple positive psychological and physical effects. But due to disease-related factors like lethargy, physical activity is far too rarely implemented. Therefore EMS-whole-body-workouts could provide an opportunity to generate positive psychological effects through a less (subjective) cost-intense strength training.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALwhole-body-workout

20 minutes whole-body-workout

DEVICEEMS

Electromyostimulation-intensity 5 (muscle stimulation)

DEVICEEMS-Placebo

Electromyostimulation-intensity 1 (no muscle stimulation)

Sponsors

Sonnenfeld-Stiftung
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Robert-Enke-Stiftung
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
miha bodytec GmbH
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants are not aware of the study hypothesis.

Intervention model description

The study has a randomised placebo-controlled crossover design. Every participant exercises two training-sessions (experimental-condition, placebo-condition) in randomized order with one week fade-out phase inbetween.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject familiarized with experimental procedure and had given written informed consent * Depression, according to ICD-10 * BDI-II Score ≥ 14 * Able to understand German * Reachability of participant for the two training sessions

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for physical exercise * Contraindications for EMS-use * Current EMS-use * Pregnancy * Borderline personality disorder * Bipolar Disorder * Schizophrenia * Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa * Dementia * Acute suicidality * Substance dependencies with actual consumption (except nicotine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in depressive symptomsFrom directly before the intervention to immediately after the intervention - both: before/after the EMS-training-session and before/after the Placebo-sessionDepressive symptoms are measured using the State-Scale of the State-Trait Depression Scales (STDS) by Spaderna, Schmukle & Krohne (2002). The SDTS State-Scale has two subscales with each 5 likert scaled items with values ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome for the first subscale and a better outcome for the second subscale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in anxiety symptomsFrom directly before the intervention to immediately after the intervention - both: before/after the EMS-training-session and before/after the Placebo-sessionAnxiety symptoms are measured using the the State-Scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) by Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner & Spielberger (1981). The STAI State-Scale has 20 likert scaled items with values ranging from 1 to 4, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change in general self-efficacyFrom directly before the intervention to immediately after the intervention - both: before/after the EMS-training-session and before/after the Placebo-sessionGeneral self-efficacy is measured using the General-Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) by Jerusalem & Schwarzer (1981). The GSE has 10 likert scaled items with values ranging from 1 to 4, higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change in intention for physical activityFrom directly before the intervention to immediately after the intervention - both: before/after the EMS-training-session and before/after the Placebo-sessionIntention for physical activity is measured using two likert scaled items by Petzold et al. (2017). Values ranging from 1 to 4, higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change in self-efficacy regarding physical activityFrom directly before the intervention to immediately after the intervention - both: before/after the EMS-training-session and before/after the Placebo-sessionSelf-efficacy is measured using two likert scaled items by Petzold et al. (2017). Values ranging from 1 to 4, higher scores mean a better outcome.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026