Skip to content

Sleep Ventilation for Patients With Advanced Hypercapnic COPD

Implementation of a Precision Sleep Ventilation (PSV) Chronic Respiratory Failure Management Program for Patients With Advanced Hypercapnic COPD

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04210050
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-12-24
Start date
2020-09-30
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2023-01-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Brief summary

Despite growing evidence showing benefit (in both clinical and cost standpoints), only a small percentage of COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure are managed with nocturnal ventilatory support. There is uncertainty of the value of aggressive nocturnal ventilation, especially polysomnographic estimation of therapy and home transcutaneous CO2 tracking. The driving goal behind this project is to develop and implement a streamlined and comprehensive program for nocturnal ventilator management of patients with advanced, hypercapnic COPD.

Detailed description

The purpose of this protocol is to perform a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness clinical trial to evaluate the role of non-invasive nocturnal ventilation in addition to usual care, compared to usual care alone in the management of adult COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. The study will focus on the primary end-points of time to hospital re-admission for acute exacerbation of COPD and/or an episode of acute on chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, in addition to other clinically relevant outcomes including patient health-related quality of life, sleep quality indices, and gas exchange parameters. Approximately 300 BIDMC adult patients will be recruited and each patient monitored over a period of 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEHome noninvasive nocturnal ventilation with Breas VIVO 50 home ventilator or newer model as available, Breas Medical.

In the usual care plus NIPPV group, those able to undergo attended PSG will be titrated with volume targeted pressure support mode, aiming to lower the baseline TcCO2 by 10 mmHg. In some cases, the CO2 cannot be lowered by that amount on a single titration, but rather will decrease over time. For those unable to undergo lab titration (too frail, no transportation, decline/refuse), NIPPV will be initiated with empiric settings based on nighttime home CO2 tracking and daytime ABG monitoring.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTArterial blood gas (ABG) and serum bicarbonate level

Will be obtained at baseline (before randomization), then at 3, 6 and 12 months into the study

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTOvernight home oximetry and transcutaneous CO2 monitoring

will be conducted at 1 and 6 months into the study (for subjects in the NIPPV plus usual care group, testing will be done while using the ventilator.

Sponsors

Breas Medical S.A.R.L.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The model is a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness clinical trial to evaluate the role of non-invasive nocturnal ventilation in addition to usual care, compared to usual care alone in the management of adult COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure. 2. Male or female aged ≥ 18 years with advanced hypercapnic COPD 1. FEV1 ≤ 50% predicted and 2. Prolonged hypercapnia during the daytime, at rest, without O2 or ventilatory support, PaCO2 \> 52 mmHg on ABG (performed off of NIPPV), compensated with pH \> 7.30 3. Willingness to use NIPPV treatment 4. English speaking Women and minorities will be recruited in numbers reflecting representation in the Boston Metropolitan community which is approximately 84% Caucasian, 9% African American, 5% Hispanic American, and 2% Asian American, as the knowledge gained can apply to individuals of all ethnic background and gender. We do not wish to limit our sample to a highly selected group of patients, to allow for more generalizable results.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects will be excluded from participation in the study for a history of: * Significant sleep disordered breathing (AHI 4% ≥ 15 events/hour) or high clinical suspicion (BMI ≥ 35) * Neuromuscular disease or other causes of hypoventilation * Abnormalities of the thorax or lungs other than COPD * Already treated with home NIPPV * Unable to wean from ventilator during admission * Unable to wean from NIPPV, pH \< 7.30 * Recent tracheotomy decannulation * History of severe depression or bipolar disorder requiring prior hospitalization or suicide attempts or ideation * Cognitive impairment (such as advanced dementia) that would limit ability to provide consent or to use NIPPV * Active recreational drug use * Unstable housing that would limit ability to use NIPPV * Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association stage IV) * Active/unstable CAD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to readmission or deathwithin 12 monthstime to re-admission for acute exacerbation of COPD and/or acute on chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure or death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient health related quality of life (HRQOL)12 monthsThe RAND SF-36, a 36-question multiple choice QOL form will be used to assess general health perception. The questions target eight health domains or scales: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal/emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, general health perceptions, and one's perceived change in health. There is a 2-step process used in scoring, such that the score for each of the scales represent the average for all item in the scale that were answered. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Next, items in the same scale are averaged together to create 8 scale scores. The lower the score the more disability and the higher the score the less disability. Scores will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 12 months for usual care and usual care plus ventilation support for all subjects.
Dyspnea scale12 monthschange in results of the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, a categorical scale from 1-5, higher score =more limitation on daily activity due to breathlessness. Scores will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 12 months for usual care and usual care plus ventilation subjects.
Gas exchange12 monthsChange in CO2 from ABG and serum bicarbonate
General health status12 monthsSt. George's Respiratory questionnaire, a 50 item questionnaire that measures health status in patients with COPD will be completed at baseline, and after 3 and 12 months in all subjects. For this questionnaire, a score of 0 = best QOL, and a score of 100 = worst QOL. The questions focus on three areas - symptoms, activity, and impact (psycho-social).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ambulatory BP profiles3 months compared to baselineIn a subset of subjects (from usual care and usual care plus ventilation groups), 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring will be conducted (at baseline and after 3 months) to assess for change in 24-hour and nocturnal systolic, diastolic and mean BPs.
Inflammatory biomarkers3 and 12 months compared to baselineHigh sensitivity C-reactive protein \[hs-CRP\], units mg/ml, can be measured from peripheral blood. Elevated levels reflect increased systemic inflammation. Studies have shown that individuals with elevated levels (above 2 mg/ml) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. During this trial, HR-CRP will be obtained at baseline and after 3 and 12 months in subjects to assess whether there is a favorable change in subjects treated with nocturnal ventilation + usual care, as compared to usual care.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026