Skip to content

Preoperative Paravertebral Block in Cancer Surgery of the Lung

Preoperative Paravertebral Block in Cancer Surgery of the Lung: ParaSOL a Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04209868
Acronym
ParaSOL
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-12-24
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Post-thoracotomy Pain, Anesthesia, Local, Chronic Pain Post-Procedural, Thoracic Neoplasm

Brief summary

The investigators aim to determine whether ultrasound-guided preemptive paravertebral blockade (PVB) local anaesthetic (pre-PVB LA), administered in addition to the post-operative PVB (post-PVB) local anaesthetic (LA) infusion, reduces acute postoperative pain, opioid requirement, chronic pain, and improves surgical recovery, in thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Detailed description

In the UK, there has been an increase in lung cancer operations, especially in high risk and elderly patients, improving survival from 10.6% in 2008 to 15.1% in 2013. Lung cancer surgery is associated with severe acute pain, a high incidence of respiratory complications and chronic post-surgical pain. Severe acute postoperative pain is a strong predictor of CPSP. The improvement of perioperative outcomes in elderly patients, the benefits of regional anaesthesia and reduction of chronic pain are investigative priorities of the Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care Setting Partnership. Enhanced recovery strategies include video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), a minimally invasive alternative to open thoracotomy, which may be associated with less postoperative pain. Regional anaesthesia, by thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or PVB, is superior to systemic opioids in reducing acute pain after thoracotomy surgery. Preemptive analgesia describes the aim of minimizing central spinal pain transmission by noxious stimuli arising from events at surgery, by administering an analgesic technique prior to surgical incision. Regional blockade affects central sensitization, allowing analgesia to outlast the pharmacological sensory blockade. Compared to TEA initiated after surgery, acute pain severity is reduced by preemptive TEA. There are conflicting reports on the benefit of preemptive analgesia in other types of surgery, but TEA and PVB may prevent CPSP in thoracotomy and breast surgery. Some small studies have shown that pre-PVB reduces acute postoperative pain. Paravertebral blockade is known to be as effective as TEA for acute postoperative analgesia following thoracic surgery, whilst having a lower incidence of pulmonary complications, hypotension and nausea. It is conventional practice in many centres for the surgical administration and placement of a catheter at the end of surgery for postoperative LA infusion (post-PVB) as the sole method of regional analgesia. Preoperative PVB is less common: anaesthetists may use a landmark technique, single or multiple injections and different volumes/strengths of LA. Ultrasound guidance for pre-PVB injection increases accuracy. In an audit using this technique with post-PVB compared to post-PVB only, the investigators demonstrated reduced pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in elective VATS patients, (mean NRS at 24h 2.5 vs 4.5), and a reduction in the proportion of patients who experienced moderate-to-severe pain of NRS≥ 3 from 83% to 50% at 24h. The investigators therefore aim to evaluate the contribution of ultrasound-guided pre-PVB, administered in addition to the post-PVB LA infusion, in reducing the severity of acute postoperative pain, perioperative opioid requirement, development of CPSP, and improving patient outcome in lung cancer patients undergoing VATS.

Interventions

DRUGLevo-Bupivacaine Hydrochloride (HCl) 0.5 % in 20mL Injection

As per arm description

DRUG0.9% Sodium Chloride 20mL Injection

As per arm description

Sponsors

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will be randomised on the day of surgery to the 'pre-PVB LA' or 'pre-PVB saline' arm, by a study investigator, with a 1:1 randomisation ratio using 'Sealed Envelope' (www.sealedenvelope.com) online software. Each subject will receive a unique randomization code in an envelope that will only be opened during the preparation of the pre-PVB injectate. A non-blinded research nurse, will prepare the pre-PVB injectate in a standard syringe according to the allocation, labelled by participant number, in a theatre location concealed from the operating room and staff. The anaesthetist, the surgeon and theatre team, recovery staff, and the researchers performing all the outcome assessments will be separate and blinded to the group allocation. The PVB catheter will be taped as normal before connecting the post-PVB LA infusion pump. We have elected to perform an interventional placebo intervention as opposed to a sham control to minimize observer bias.

Intervention model description

The study will be conducted at Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom (UK), a large tertiary thoracic centre for London, Sussex, Kent and Berkshire. In 2015, 459 lung cancer resection operations were performed; 8% of all lung cancer resections in England. Criteria for discontinuation/withdrawal or modifying allocated treatment: * Participant request to withdraw from the study. * Intraoperative identification of infection/tumour in paravertebral space Patient recruitment Eligible patients will be identified in the catchment outpatient clinics 4-6 weeks before surgery. The participant information sheet (PIS) will be introduced in the standard surgical booklet given by the surgeon. At the preoperative assessment clinic 2-3 weeks before surgery, a face-to-face discussion with the research nurse will support the PIS; the opportunity to ask any questions and contact a PPI (Patient and Public Involvement) representative and will be given. Written informed consent will be obtained.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective radical primary lung cancer VATS surgery for single lobectomy * American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-III * Age ≥18

Exclusion criteria

* Planned open thoracotomy, wedge resection, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy, chest wall resection or total pleurectomy * Local anaesthetic or opioid allergy * Coagulation disorders * Inability to comply with study questionnaire completion * Pre-existing pain in chest area or pre-existing pain conditions * Local infection/tumour at proposed PVB site * Previous lung surgery * Planned surgery within 3 months of the primary lung resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Moderate-to-severe pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) >/=31 dayThe proportion of patients with clinical relevant moderate-to-severe pain (NRS\>/=3) related to the surgical site at rest at 24 hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative morphine requirement48 hoursCumulative morphine requirement over 48 hours post arrival in recovery
Time to first mobilization3 daysTime to first mobilization (walking 50 metres without the aid of another person), measured at baseline pre-operatively and postoperatively on daily assessment.
Incidence of in-hospital complications3 daysIncidence of in-hospital complications (Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Myocardial Infarction (MI), unplanned ICU admission) and respiratory complications, as defined by the Melbourne Group Scale.
Acute postoperative pain related to the surgical site as measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on coughing.1 hourAcute postoperative pain related to the surgical site as measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on coughing, preoperatively, and after arrival in recovery at 1, 6, 24 and 48 hours
Quality of Life (QoL) scorePre-operative and at 3 and 6 months post-operativelyQuality of Life (QoL) score as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) version 3
Presence of chronic post-surgical painMeasured at 3 and 6 months post-operativelyPresence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) (binary yes/no) fulfilling CPSP criteria
Length of hospital stay3 daysLength of hospital stay (in days)

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactCheng Ong, MBBS
cheng.ong@gstt.nhs.uk+44 2071887188
Backup ContactCraig R Johnstone, MBChB
craig.johnstone@gstt.nhs.uk+44 2071887188

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026