Skip to content

Optimizing Response to Li Treatment Through Personalized Evaluation of Individuals With Bipolar I Disorder: The R-LiNK Initiative

Optimizing Response to Li Treatment Through Personalized Evaluation of Individuals With Bipolar I Disorder: The R-LiNK Initiative

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04209140
Acronym
R-LiNK
Enrollment
320
Registered
2019-12-23
Start date
2020-01-10
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2022-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar I Disorder

Brief summary

Bipolar disorder (BD), especially BD type I, is a highly prevalent mental disorder and a is a highly prevalent mental disorder and an important factor for suicide. Lithium is the key treatment for prevention of BD relapse and has a proven suicide prevention effect. Whilst many cases become asymptomatic with lithium treatment, the majority show sub-optimal response. The objectives of this project are to: * improve outcomes of bipolar I disorder (BDI) cases prescribed lithium through the application of stratified approaches * optimize the early prediction of lithium response using a set of multi-modal biomarkers (blood omics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Li7-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy derived-markers) * develop a multidisciplinary multinational network of experts to undertake this and future projects on personalized diagnostics and therapeutics and * implement new, powerful technologies to characterize brain lithium distribution and the blood molecular signature of lithium in responders and non-responders. This cutting edge approach will identify the eligibility criteria for treatment with lithium in BD in terms of response, safety and tolerability.

Interventions

Decisions relating to treatment are also considered the clinician's responsibility to be made according to bipolar treatment guidelines and international standards of care (e.g. discontinuation, co-prescriptions, and according to SmPC in force). After the clinician has confirmed the indication of Lithium treatment as well as the absence of contra-indicated concomintant medication (NSAIDs and Diuretics) and after pre- Lithium evaluations confirm the absence of contra-indication, Lithium is initiated following standard of care: progressive titration to reach therapeutic plasma levels. Clinicians will use the therapeutic range provided by the laboratory they use in their usual clinical practice and according to the type of Lithium they prescribe.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Decision to prescribe Li as a prophylactic treatment based on clinicians' assessment * Confirmed diagnosis of BD1 according to DSM-5 criteria * Aged 18-70 years. * Able and willing to give written informed consent * consents to blood sample for the purpose of the RLiNK study * Covered by a Social Security Insurance where applicable * Patients on Curatorship (consent form signed by the patient and specific consent form for the curator)

Exclusion criteria

* Trial of Lithium undertaken within the last 6 months * Lifetime history of mood disorder better explained by a DSM-5 definition for schizoaffective disorder * Pre-lithium screening suggest that Lithium initiation is contraindicated: * Incompatible concurrent treatments: long-term use of non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or diuretics for a known and established comorbid disorder with no possible alternative treatment (i.e. absolute contra-indication to Li treatment) * Health issues (risk of worsening of a pre-existing condition) Psoriasis, Brugada syndrome * Renal dysfunction: Glomerular Filtration rate below 60mL/min/1.73m 2 * On-going Pregnancy or planned pregnancy on the next 2 years * Lactating and breast feeding women (see SmPc) * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respondermonth 24Good Responder The individual meets criteria for sustained remission, namely they experience euthymia (defined as a score on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (qIDS)\<6 and the Bech Rafaelson Mania Scale (BRMS)\<7) for at least 8 weeks during the two-year follow-up period without evidence of relapse into a syndromal episode of BD at any time after achieving sustained euthymia. AND No addition of a new mood stabilizer with the purpose of promoting mood stabilisation after lithium initiation Non Responder The individual: Fails to meet criteria for sustained remission (euthymia defined as a score on the qIDS\<6 and the BRMS\<7 for a minimum period \>=8 consecutive weeks) during the two-year follow-up. OR Experiences \>=1 relapse into a syndromal episode of BD of any polarity during the two-year follow-up period without any period of sustained remission Definition of a Partial Responder All cases not fulfilling the criteria of Good Responders or Non Responders

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alda ScaleMonth 24Alda scale defined in the following article : Grof P, Duffy A, Cavazzoni P, Grof E et al. Is response to prophylactic lithium a familial trait? J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Oct;63(10):942-7.
Responder - sensitivityMonth 24Good Responders= Recorded improvement of illness activity is \>=70% AND no addition of mood stab after Li initiation Non Responders= Recorded improvement of illness activity is \<=30% whatever the treatment has been Partial Responders = Recorded improvement of illness activity is between 70 and 30% whatever the treatment has been OR Recorded improvement of illness activity is \>=70% but the addition of mood stab after Li initiation has occurred
Time to new BDMonth 24Time to a new Bipolar Disorder (BD) episode, defined as the delay between inclusion and the date of the diagnosis of new Bipolar disorder
Time to BD hospitalizationMonth 24Time to a new hospitalization for BD, defined as the delay between inclusion and the date of new hospitalization for Bipolar disorder
Time to new mood stabilizerMonth 24Time to prescription of a new mood stabilizer, defined as the delay between inclusion and the date of prescription of a new mood stabilizer
Monthly qIDSmonthly from month 1 to month 24Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (qIDS)
AdherenceMonth 24Adequate adherence will be defined as the individual taking at least 70% of the Li prescribed (i.e. either \>70% prescribed dose &/or \>70% of the time) based on the monthly assessment of adherence
Monthly BPRSmonthly from month 1 to month 24Brief Psychosis Rating Scale (BPRS)
Monthly ISSmonthly from month 1 to month 24Internal State Scale (ISS)
Monthly LIFE-IImonthly from month 1 to month 24Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE-II)
WHODASMonth 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, month 24World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS)
Cost-effectivenessMonth 24EuroQOL-5D scale
Monthly BRMSmonthly from month 1 to month 24Bech Rafaelson Mania Scale (BRMS)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026