Skip to content

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Imipenem and Tigecycline Versus Imipenem and Tigecycline With GM-CSF for the Management of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Presenting With Septic Shock.

Imipenem and Tigecycline Versus Imipenem and Tigecycline With GM-CSF for the Management of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Presenting With Septic Shock.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04208763
Enrollment
90
Registered
2019-12-23
Start date
2019-12-20
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Brief summary

Study population: A total of 90 consecutive patients of decompensated cirrhosis of any etiology, presenting to the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences with SBP with septic shock will be included. Study design: Randomized controlled trial Study period: August 2019 to December 2021. Sample size: Assuming that the response rate is 90% with GM-CSF and 60% without GM-CSF after day 5. With alpha 5 and power 80,we need to enroll 76 cases (38 cases with each). Further assuming 20 % drop-out due to various reasons, it was decided to enroll 90 cases randomly allocated into two groups (i.e., 45 in each) by block randomization method by taking block size as 6. So for the present study, it was decided to enroll 90 cases in all. Group A will be given Imipenem and Tigecycline. Patients with recent hospitalisation will be given Colistin in addition. Group B will be given: To another group we will give Imipenem and Tigecycline and GMCSF.Patients with recent hospitalisation will be given Colistin in addition. The dose of antibiotic will be given at dosage Inj Imipenem 1gm i.v. TDS Inj Tigecycline 100mg stat f/b 50mg i.v. OD Inj GM-CSF 500mcg s.c. OD Inj Colistin 9 MIU i.v. stat f/b 4.5 MIU i.v. BD Monitoring and assessment At the baseline, all patients will undergo investigational evaluation as described Daily monitoring of following parameters: * Haemoglobin, * Total peripheral leucocyte counts, * Platelet counts, * Renal function tests * Liver function tests and * Chest X rays will be undertaken * Ascitic fluid analysis will be done on day 0, day 2 and day 5 Stopping rule:If the patient develops a TLC of more than 50,000, the dose of the GM CSF will be reduced to half and the treatment continued. If, even after the reduction, the TLC rises to more than 50,000, then the treatment will be stopped and the patient excluded. Expected outcome of the project: Addition of GM-CSF to standard antibiotic regimen helps resolve SBP and improves outcome in decompensated liver cirrhotic patients.

Interventions

DRUGImipenem

Inj Imipenem 1gm i.v. TDS

DRUGTigecycline

Inj Tigecycline 100mg stat f/b 50mg i.v. OD

DRUGGMCSF

Inj GM-CSF 500mcg s.c. OD

DRUGColistin

Inj Colistin 9 MIU i.v. stat f/b 4.5 MIU i.v. BD

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) with shock in a cirrhotic 2. Hospital acquired SBP with shock 3. Difficult to treat SBP

Exclusion criteria

1. Refractory Shock 2. Cardiac comorbidities (known Coronary Artery Disease) 3. Chronic Kidney Disease on Maintenance Hemodialysis 4. \< 18 years. 5. Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma 6. Post liver transplant 7. HIV + ve, Immunosuppressive therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resolution of Spontaneous Bacterial peritonitis in both groupsDay 5Response is defined by resolution of SBP in terms of total counts \< 500,Neutrophil\<250

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival in both groupsDay 7
Change in ascitic fluid metabolites Nitric Oxide in both groupsDay 28change is defined as percentage reduction in nitric oxide
Change in ascitic fluid macrophage population in both groupsDay 28change is defined as percentage reduction in macrophage population
Development of Hepatic Encephalopathy in both groups.Day 28Hepatic Encephalopathy will be measured as per West Haven criteria
Reversal of shock in both groupsDay 2Blood pressure more than 90/60 mmHg with no inotropes requirement
Development of Pneumonia in both groups.Day 28Pneumonia will be confirmed based on imaging and clinically
Development of organ failures in both groups.Day 28Organ failure will be as per APACHE score
Development of coagulopathy in both groups.Day 28Coagulopathy is defined as INR \> 1.5
Resolution of Spontaneous Bacterial peritonitis in both groupsDay 2Response is defined by resolution of SBP in terms of total counts \< 500,Neutrophil\<250
Development of Acute Kidney Injury in both groupsDay 28AKIN criteria will be used for Acute kidney injury

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Abhijeet Ranjan, MD
drkmrabhijeet@gmail.com01146300000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026