Skip to content

Implementation and Effectiveness Trial of HN-STAR

Implementation and Effectiveness Trial of HN-STAR

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04208490
Acronym
HN-STAR
Enrollment
357
Registered
2019-12-23
Start date
2021-02-23
Completion date
2026-05-21
Last updated
2026-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer

Keywords

Survivorship

Brief summary

People who have been treated for head and neck cancer (HNC survivors) can experience serious consequences from their cancer and its treatment, ongoing risks of new cancers, and other unrelated illnesses. These concerns pose challenges to the provision of comprehensive care to HNC survivors. We created HN-STAR to facilitate and tailor the ongoing care of HNC survivors. Survivors use HN-STAR on a computer or tablet to answer questions about symptoms and health concerns before a routine visit with a cancer care provider. During the clinic visit, the provider uses HN-STAR to see evidence-based recommendations for managing each concern reported by the survivor. The provider and survivor discuss recommendations and select appropriate actions (e.g., testing, referrals, prescriptions, self-management). HN-STAR produces a survivorship care plan that includes all reported concerns and the actions selected in clinic. The survivorship care plan is given to the survivor and the primary care provider. Three months, six months, and nine months later, the survivor uses HN-STAR from home (or clinic) to report their concerns again, and a new survivorship care plan is created each time. Our trial randomizes 20-36 oncology practices from the National Community Oncology Research Program to use HN-STAR or provide usual care to 298-400 recent survivors of head and neck cancer. We hypothesize that survivors in the HN-STAR arm will have greater improvement in patient-centered outcomes (including cancer-related well-being, symptoms, and patient activation) over one year compared to survivors in the usual care arm, measured by surveys at baseline and one year later. We also hypothesize that survivors in the HN-STAR arm will be more likely to receive care that is aligned with evidence-based recommendations during the year of the study than survivors in the usual care arm. Our final aim investigates the implementation of HN-STAR in clinical practice, using interviews and surveys of survivors, providers, and other clinic staff to understand the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and other aspects of providing survivorship care to head and neck cancer survivors.

Detailed description

In this cluster randomized hybrid implementation-effectiveness controlled trial, 10-18 intervention practices will provide care with access to HN-STAR, and 10-18 practices will provide usual care without access to HN-STAR. We will implement no more than five intervention sites within the first 3 months of activation. Providers at each site will be invited to view a video regarding head and neck survivorship care. Designated providers at each intervention site will be trained to use HN-STAR during routine follow-up care with survivors. Eligible survivors who completed treatment for head and neck cancer ≤24 months ago with no evidence of disease (N=298-400) will complete a Survivor Baseline Health Assessment prior to visiting an oncology provider, a brief Survivor Post-Visit Survey about their clinic visit, and a Survivor Follow-Up Health Assessment one year later. Survivors in the intervention arm will additionally complete Survivor Quarterly Health Assessments every three months after the clinic visit, which will produce an updated SCP. We will compare changes in patient-centered outcomes from baseline to 1-year in survivors at the intervention and usual care clinics using data from health assessments. The primary patient-centered outcome is head and neck cancer-specific quality of life measured at baseline and follow-up. Other patient-centered outcomes include symptom burden, patient activation, and perceived quality of care, also measured at baseline and follow-up. The secondary outcome of receipt of guideline-concordant care will be assessed using data from the Survivor and Designated Clinician Post-Visit Surveys and the Primary Care Provider (PCP) and Oncology Medical Records Abstraction forms from oncology practices and primary care providers identified by enrolled survivors. NCORP staff at each practice will request outside records (with survivor permission via a signed local Medical Release Form) and abstract data from these medical records. Implementation data will come from Survivor Post-Visit Survey and Survivor Follow-up Health Assessment, interviews at two time points with a subset of survivors (Survivor Post-Visit and Follow-Up Interviews, N=40), interviews with a subset of primary care providers a year after the designated clinic visit (Primary Care Provider Interview, N=30-40), surveys of stakeholders and designated clinicians at two time points (Stakeholder and Designated Clinician Initial and Final Surveys), and interviews of stakeholders and designated clinicians at one time point (Stakeholder and Designated Clinician Final Interview). All interviews will be conducted by Memorial Sloan Kettering study team members.

Interventions

OTHERHN-STAR Intervention

The Head and Neck Survivorship Tool (HN-STAR) is a web-based tool used to assist clinicians in implementing the ACS/ASCO HNC survivorship guidelines.

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Survivor Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years. * Diagnosis of primary or locoregionally recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, specifically oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and unknown squamous cell carcinoma primary. * Completed chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy with curative intent for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma ≤ 24 months prior to designated clinician visit. * Deemed free of disease at last assessment. * Cognitively and physically able to complete study survey per local NCORP site staff discretion. * Scheduled for a clinic visit with a provider who has agreed to participate in this study and meets requirements for the arm to which their practice has been assigned (the practice designated clinician) for routine follow-up. * Willing to complete study assessments 3, 6, and 9 months after the designated clinic visit either 1) remotely (via telephone or videoconference using smartphone, tablet, or computer) or 2) at the clinic to complete study assessments on a clinic tablet or computer. Survivor

Exclusion criteria

* In active cancer treatment (including hormone therapy) for any other cancer, excluding local therapy for non-melanoma skin cancer. * Evidence of prior cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) within 3 years of the designated clinician visit. * Head and neck tumor histology of lymphoma, adenocarcinoma or melanoma. * Recurrent, persistent, or progressive disease at last assessment (per scan or clinical assessment). * Does not speak or read English, because the HN-STAR tool is only available in English at this time. * Received only surgery as treatment for head and neck cancer. * Current, planned enrollment, or in follow-up on another interventional symptom management study protocol, as per patient self-report or research staff members' knowledge at the time of consent. Concurrent participation in treatment or imaging studies is allowed. Designated Clinician Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> = 18 years * MD, DO, NP, or PA * Able to speak and read English, because the HN-STAR tool is only available in English at this time. * Routinely provides care for cancer patients or survivors. * Willing to complete study-specific trainings and incorporate HN-STAR or provide usual care in a routine follow-up care visit Stakeholders Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> = 18 * Member of the practice clinical or administrative team who is involved in the oversight of the delivery of head and neck cancer survivorship care or who would make decisions about implementing head and neck survivorship tools such as HN-STAR. This could include clinic administrators, nurse navigators, key clinical team members, program directors, and other staff (e.g., service line or nursing leaders). * Employed for at least one month at the practice. * Able to speak and reads English, because the HN-STAR tool is only available in English at this time. Stakeholder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HNC-Specific QOLBaseline & 1 yearMeasured using Trial Outcome Index from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck. It is a 23-item summary measure that ranges from 0 to a maximum of 96 where higher scores indicate better overall physical and functional outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in QoLBaseline & 1 yearMeasured using domains and overall measures from the FACT H\&N. The total score evaluates overall QoL in Head and Neck Cancer patients and ranges from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating better overall QoL. Subscales are calculated by summing the relevant questions \[answered using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much)\]. Higher scores on subscales represent a better health state.
Change symptom burdenBaseline & 1 yearMeasured using scales from the EORTC QLQ-HN43. Symptom subscales from the EORTC QLQ- HN43 range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing higher symptom burden.
Change in symptom burdenBaseline & 1 yearMeasured using PRO-CTCAE items for relevant symptoms.
Change in painBaseline & 1 yearMeasured using Brief Pain Inventory Short Form. Pain severity and interference items are measured using a scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain or interference. The average is used as a summary measure of pain severity and pain interference.
Change in patient activationBaseline & 1 yearMeasured using Patient Activation Measure Short Form. PAM score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score meaning higher level of activation.
Change in perceived quality of cancer careBaseline & 1 yearMeasured using the CAHPS® Cancer Care Survey.
Adherence and surveillance of guideline concordant careThese variables will be derived from the medical record during the year following the initial visit.Rate at which survivors had ≥1 visit to a primary care provider in the year following the initial visit will be compared by arm. Receipt or non-receipt of guideline-concordant cancer surveillance will be derived from the oncology medical records and compared by arm.

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRKathryn E Weaver, PhD

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 25, 2026