Hip Fractures
Conditions
Brief summary
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of a HIP-REP on the quality and independence in ADL ability (performance), measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) and health-related Quality of Life (QoL). Hypothesis: The HIP-REP will increase the quality and independence in ADL performance, measured with AMPS and health-related QoL measure.
Detailed description
Little is known about the effect of an intersectoral rehabilitation intervention aiming at reducing the decrease in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) ability for elderly with hip fractures. Despite positive surgical outcomes, one-quarter dies within a year after surgery, around eight percent are readmitted to hospital, and just one-third regain their pre-fracture level of physical functioning and ADL ability. After hip fracture, the loss of independence, and further decrease in ADL ability often persists beyond three months after surgery. This increases the risk of social isolation, depression and thus a decrease in QoL. Therefore, the investigators want to evaluate whether an activity-based rehabilitation intervention across sectors is effective and influences this fragile group of patients. The investigators hope to increase the ability to safely and independently perform ADL in elderly with hip fractures, and thereby enhance their health-related QoL.
Interventions
OTHERHIP-REP
HIP-REP programme is an add on to usual care which includes 5 add on individual activity-focused interventions that will be tailored to the need of elderly with hip fracture in a liaison with the health care professionals. Home visits and follow-up phone call will be a part of programme.
OTHERUsual care
The elderly in the control group will receive usual rehabilitation. with a focus on mobilization within 24 hours postoperative as an in-patient. In the municipality physiotherapy is offered twice a week for approximately 12 weeks postoperative focusing on neuromotor control over hip, activation and strengthening of muscles as well as increase mobility. When relevant, the elderly receives a home visit by an occupational therapist who assess ADL behaviours, the use of assistive devices and the environmental hazards, preparing and adapting the home environment to prevent falls.
Sponsors
Municipality of Herlev
Municipality of Gentofte
Municipality of Lyngby-Taarbaek
Municipality of Furesoe
Municipality of Rudersdal
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Jonkoping University
Intersectoral Research Unit
Metropolitan University College
Danish Association of Occupational Therapist
Danish Regions Development and Research
Carsten Bogh Juhl
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Activity-based intervention
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 65 years or older * Recent proximal hip fracture (S 72.0 medial femur fracture, S 72.1, pertrochanteric femur fracture, S 72.2 subtrochanteric femur fracture) * Living at home prior to hip fracture in Herlev, Gentofte, Furesoe, Rudersdal or Lyngby-Taarbæk municipalities * Ability to give informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Not expected to be discharged to home or rehabilitation centers in the municipality * Not able to speak and/or understand Danish * Have prior severe physical and /or mental disabilities
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of Motor and Process Skills | Change frombaseline at motor and process skills 3 and 6 months after baseline testing | The assessment measures the quality of a person's activity of daily living task performance. An observational assessment that allows for evaluation of change in motor and process skills and their effect on the ability of an individual to perform complex or instrumental and personal activities of daily living. The instrument consists of 16 motor and 20 process skill abilities that are rated on a 4-point scale. The rating scale is based on the following criteria (Quality of performance); 4 = Competent, 3 = Questionable, 2 = Ineffective or 1 = Severely deficient. In all, 36 discrete ratings of motor and process skills are made during observation. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| European Quality of Life Questionnaire | At baseline and 3 and 6 months after baseline testing | A survey collecting information about health related quality of life comprising five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. |
| Verbal Rating Scale | At baseline and 3 and 6 months after baseline testing | An assessment measuring the intensity of pain. The patient chooses one of those: none, mild, moderate or severe. |
| Functional Recovery Score | at baseline and 3 and 6 months after baseline testing | Functional Recovery Score assess the level of function with eleven-items comprised of three main components: basic activities of daily living assessed by four items, instrumental activities of daily living assessed by six items, and mobility assessed by one item. Basic activities of daily living comprise 44 percent of the score; instrumental activities of daily living comprise 23 percent, and mobility comprises 33 percent. Complete independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily living and mobility results in a score of 100percent. |
Countries
Denmark
Outcome results
None listed