Skip to content

Safety of Gebauer's Pain Ease and Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride

Study to Determine the Safety of Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride and Gebauer's Pain Ease Sprays When Used Following ChloraPrep for Invasive Procedures

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04207710
Enrollment
72
Registered
2019-12-23
Start date
2021-01-26
Completion date
2022-02-25
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Safety Issues, Spray

Keywords

Pain Ease, Ethyl Chloride, Safety, Topical anesthetic, ChloraPrep, Topical refrigerant, Microbial growth

Brief summary

This study aims to determine if Gebauer's Pain Ease or Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride topical anesthetic sprays are safe for use as numbing agents prior to placing epidurals and arterial lines, based on whether they introduce increased microbial growth after application to skin. Due to the recent national shortage of lidocaine, we hope to find a suitable alternative to lidocaine for topical analgesia when placing arterial lines and epidurals. Our hypothesis is that the sprays will not affect the sterility of the area. We will compare microbial growth from three subsequent swabs taken from a single area of skin on the wrist and lower back: one with no treatment, the second after treatment with ChloraPrep, and the third after applying one of the numbing sprays. If there is significantly higher growth in the swabs containing the topical anesthetic spray versus the ChloraPrep alone, this will indicate that the sprays introduce microbes to the sites of skin.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Gebauer's Pain Ease and Ethyl Chloride topical anesthetic sprays are safe for application on the areas of skin where epidurals (lower back) and arterial lines (wrist) are placed, based on whether they introduce microbial growth to these areas. The investigators will compare microbial growth by swabbing both of these skin sites following: 1) no treatment 2) ChloraPrep treatment and 3) ChloraPrep plus numbing spray (Ethyl Chloride or Pain Ease) treatment. The cultures will then be incubated to test for anaerobic bacteria, aerobic bacteria, and mold growth. The microbial growth will be compared between the three treatment groups based on the number of colony forming units present. Funding for the project will be from the manufacturer of the numbing sprays, Gebauer Company. Based on power analysis, for each of the numbing sprays, a total of 72 subjects must be enrolled, with 6 swabs taken per subject (untreated, ChloraPrep, and topical anesthetic spray samples will be taken from both the wrist and lower back of each subject). A sample size of 72 pairs achieves 80 % power to detect an odds ratio of 24 using a two-sided McNemar test with a significance level of 0.05.

Interventions

DRUGGebauer's Pain Ease Top Aerosol Mist Spray

Topical refrigerant spray

Topical refrigerant spray

Sponsors

Gebauer Company
CollaboratorNETWORK
Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The microbiology lab staff culturing and analyzing the samples for microbial growth will not know what type of treatment each sample received. Each sample will only be labelled with a numerical string. The research staff will have a spreadsheet to determine which numerical string corresponds with which treatment.

Intervention model description

72 participants will have an area of skin on the wrist and lower back swabbed three times each. First, the untreated patch of skin will be swabbed, then it will be treated with ChloraPep and swabbed, then Pain Ease spray will be applied and the area will be swabbed again. The same process will be performed using Ethyl Chloride spray instead of Pain Ease on the opposite wrist and adjacent area on the lower back. The bacterial growth will be compared amongst the different treatments, based on the number of colony forming units that are present.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Henry Ford employees

Exclusion criteria

* People with infections at the site of prep * People with history of hypersensitivity to numbing sprays or chloraprep

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Skin samples were swabbed within 20 seconds of Ethyl Chloride or Pain Ease application, and then swabs were cultured for 3 days before checking for the presence of CFU.Number of skin samples that were positive for bacterial growth following treatment with ChloraPrep and then application of a topical refrigerant spray (Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride or Gebauer's Pain Ease), when the area was swabbed and cultured for three days. A sample was considered positive if 1 or more colony forming units were present per swab.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Microbial Growth on Skin After Application of Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride or Pain Ease
In a split-person design, each subject had four areas of skin swabbed as follows: * Left wrist swabbed before and after Chloraprep application, and again after application of Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride topical refrigerant spray * Right wrist swabbed before and after Chloraprep application, and again after application of Gebauer's Pain Ease. * Low back swabbed before and after Chloraprep application, and then after application of Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride topical refrigerant spray. * Another section of low back swabbed before and after Chloraprep application, and then after application of Gebauer's Pain Ease topical refrigerant spray. The bacterial growth prior to and after numbing spray application were evaluated based on the number of colony forming units that were present.
72
Total72

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous— years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 720 / 720 / 720 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 720 / 720 / 720 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 720 / 720 / 720 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Presence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)

Number of skin samples that were positive for bacterial growth following treatment with ChloraPrep and then application of a topical refrigerant spray (Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride or Gebauer's Pain Ease), when the area was swabbed and cultured for three days. A sample was considered positive if 1 or more colony forming units were present per swab.

Time frame: Skin samples were swabbed within 20 seconds of Ethyl Chloride or Pain Ease application, and then swabs were cultured for 3 days before checking for the presence of CFU.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Wrist, Gebauer's Ethyl ChloridePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep followed by topical refrigerant spray2 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Wrist, Gebauer's Ethyl ChloridePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth before ChloraPrep treatment (positive control)68 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Wrist, Gebauer's Ethyl ChloridePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep1 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Lower Back, Gebauer's Ethyl ChloridePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep followed by topical refrigerant spray1 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Lower Back, Gebauer's Ethyl ChloridePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth before ChloraPrep treatment (positive control)63 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Lower Back, Gebauer's Ethyl ChloridePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep0 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Wrist, Gebauer's Pain EasePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep0 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Wrist, Gebauer's Pain EasePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep followed by topical refrigerant spray1 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Wrist, Gebauer's Pain EasePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth before ChloraPrep treatment (positive control)65 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Lower Back, Gebauer's Pain EasePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep followed by topical refrigerant spray1 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Lower Back, Gebauer's Pain EasePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth before ChloraPrep treatment (positive control)49 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Lower Back, Gebauer's Pain EasePresence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)Samples with positive growth after application of ChloraPrep2 Number of samples with 1+ CFU
Comparison: Comparison of incidence of positive growth in samples obtained following application of ChloraPrep vs. ChloraPrep followed by Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride.p-value: 0.317Friedman
Comparison: Comparison of incidence of positive growth in samples obtained following application of ChloraPrep vs. ChloraPrep followed by Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride.p-value: 0.317Friedman
Comparison: Comparison of incidence of positive growth in samples obtained following application of ChloraPrep vs. ChloraPrep followed by Gebauer's Pain Ease.p-value: 0.317Friedman
Comparison: Comparison of incidence of positive growth in samples obtained following application of ChloraPrep vs. ChloraPrep followed by Gebauer's Pain Ease.p-value: 0.317Friedman

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026