Skip to content

PrEP Readiness Interventions for Supporting Motivation

PrEP Readiness Interventions for Supporting Motivation in Stimulant-Using Sexual Minority Men

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04205487
Acronym
PRISM
Enrollment
70
Registered
2019-12-19
Start date
2020-10-16
Completion date
2023-07-28
Last updated
2025-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections, Pre-exposure Prophylaxis, Substance Use Disorders

Brief summary

The overarching goal of this formative research is to examine whether, and in what combination, contingency management (CM) and motivational interviewing (MI) can facilitate entry of stimulant-using men who have sex with men (MSM) into the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care continuum.

Detailed description

In Stage 1, participants will be randomized to receive either: 1) three months of CM; or 2) two sessions of MI. All participants will be assessed at three months post-randomization for non-response. In Stage 2, a second randomization where non-responders (i.e., those who have not filled a PrEP prescription) are assigned to: 1) Switch to sequentially receive the other intervention (i.e., CM+MI or MI+CM); or 2) Continue with assessments only (i.e., CM-Only or MI-Only). All participants will complete a final assessment at 6 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational Interviewing (MI)

Two motivational interviewing sessions focusing on stimulant use, sexual risk, and PrEP uptake will be delivered via Zoom.

CM will include financial incentives for PrEP clinical evaluation and filling a PrEP prescription.

Sponsors

City University of New York
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Florida International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 years of age * Sexually active cisgender sexual minority man * Reports using stimulants in the past three months * HIV-negative serostatus * Meets Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for PrEP eligibility

Exclusion criteria

* Currently prescribed PrEP * Unable to provide informed consent * Severe psychiatric symptoms (e.g., mania, psychosis) that impair capacity to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEP6 MonthsThe proportion of participants who provide evidence that they have filled a PrEP prescription

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical Provider6 MonthsThe proportion of participants reporting that they attended a medical appointment to be evaluated for PrEP.
Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use Severity6 monthsParticipants will complete the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST), which provides validated composite scores indexing the severity of methamphetamine use (Mild = 0-3; Moderate = 4-26; Severe = 27 or greater).
Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)6 monthsParticipants will complete a detailed behavioral assessment to report the number of men with whom they have had receptive CAS. The proportion of participants reporting any receptive CAS will be reported.
Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)6 monthsParticipants will complete a detailed behavioral assessment to report the number of men with whom they have had insertive CAS. The proportion of participants reporting any insertive CAS will be reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A US national sample of sexual minority men taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) who reported using stimulants (i.e., methamphetamine, powder cocaine, or crack-cocaine) in the past three months was recruited from social networking applications and existing consent-to-contact databases.

Pre-assignment details

Participants completed a run-in period where they were asked to provide a saliva sample via mail to confirm they were not living with HIV. Those who did not provide a saliva sample or those with reactive HIV results were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CM-Only (Non-Responder)
Participants randomized in Stage 1 to receive CM financial incentives for PrEP clinical evaluation and filling a PrEP prescription that were non-responders. These participants were randomized to receive assessments only in Stage 2, or were lost to follow up during Stage 1 and we not re-randomized during stage 2.
15
MI-Only (Non-Responder)
Participants randomized in Stage 1 two MI sessions focusing on stimulant use, sexual risk, and PrEP uptake delivered via Zoom. These participants were randomized to receive assessments only in Stage 2, or were lost to follow up during stage 1 and were not re-randomized during stage 2.
21
CM+MI (Non-Responder)
Sequential delivery of CM (Stage 1) and MI (Stage 2) for non-responders that were randomized in Stage 2 to switch.
9
MI+CM (Non-Responder)
Sequential delivery of MI (Stage 1) and CM (Stage 2) for non-responders that were randomized in Stage 2 to switch.
7
CM-Only (Responder)
Responders randomized to receive CM financial incentives for PrEP clinical evaluation and uptake in Stage 1 who provided evidence of a recent PrEP prescription.
11
MI-Only (Responder)
Responders randomized to receive two MI sessions focusing on stimulant use, sexual risk, and PrEP uptake delivered via Zoom.
7
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMI-Only (Non-Responder)CM-Only (Non-Responder)TotalMI-Only (Responder)CM-Only (Responder)MI+CM (Non-Responder)CM+MI (Non-Responder)
Age, Continuous41 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
41 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
41 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
36 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
43 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
45 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
40 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Annual Income
$100,000 or more
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Annual Income
$25,000 - $74,999
6 Participants7 Participants30 Participants4 Participants7 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Annual Income
$5,000 - $24,999
7 Participants5 Participants23 Participants3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Annual Income
$75,000 - $99,000
2 Participants0 Participants6 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Annual Income
Less than $5,000
4 Participants1 Participants7 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Annual Income
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants12 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants14 Participants58 Participants5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants3 Participants7 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants10 Participants50 Participants4 Participants7 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants15 Participants70 Participants7 Participants11 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants15 Participants70 Participants7 Participants11 Participants7 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 210 / 90 / 70 / 110 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 210 / 90 / 70 / 110 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 210 / 90 / 70 / 110 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEP

The proportion of participants who provide evidence that they have filled a PrEP prescription

Time frame: 6 Months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPNo5 Participants
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPYes0 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPNo11 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPYes2 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPNo7 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPYes2 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPNo2 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPYes5 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPYes11 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPNo0 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPYes7 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Filling a Prescription for PrEPNo0 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use Severity

Participants will complete the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST), which provides validated composite scores indexing the severity of methamphetamine use (Mild = 0-3; Moderate = 4-26; Severe = 27 or greater).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityModerate (4-26)1 Participants
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeveritySevere (27 or greater)0 Participants
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityMild (0-3)2 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityMild (0-3)7 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeveritySevere (27 or greater)4 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityModerate (4-26)1 Participants
CM+MIClinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeveritySevere (27 or greater)0 Participants
CM+MIClinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityMild (0-3)2 Participants
CM+MIClinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityModerate (4-26)6 Participants
MI+CMClinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityMild (0-3)4 Participants
MI+CMClinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeveritySevere (27 or greater)1 Participants
MI+CMClinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityModerate (4-26)0 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityModerate (4-26)3 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeveritySevere (27 or greater)2 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityMild (0-3)2 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeveritySevere (27 or greater)1 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityMild (0-3)6 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Clinical Cut Points for Self-reported Methamphetamine Use SeverityModerate (4-26)0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)

Participants will complete a detailed behavioral assessment to report the number of men with whom they have had insertive CAS. The proportion of participants reporting any insertive CAS will be reported.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)Yes2 Participants
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)No1 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)Yes6 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)No6 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)Yes4 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)No4 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)Yes2 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)No3 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)Yes5 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)No2 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)Yes6 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Insertive Condomless Anal Sex (Insertive CAS)No1 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)

Participants will complete a detailed behavioral assessment to report the number of men with whom they have had receptive CAS. The proportion of participants reporting any receptive CAS will be reported.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)Yes0 Participants
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)No3 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)Yes6 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)No6 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)Yes4 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)No4 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)Yes2 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)No3 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)Yes2 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)No5 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)Yes3 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Reported Receptive Condomless Anal Sex (Receptive CAS)No4 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical Provider

The proportion of participants reporting that they attended a medical appointment to be evaluated for PrEP.

Time frame: 6 Months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderYes3 Participants
CM-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderNo2 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderYes9 Participants
MI-Only (Non-Responder or Lost to Follow Up During Stage 1)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderNo4 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderYes8 Participants
CM+MIProportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderNo1 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderYes4 Participants
MI+CMProportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderNo3 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderYes11 Participants
CM-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderNo0 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderYes7 Participants
MI-Only (Responder)Proportion of Participants Who Self-report PrEP Clinical Evaluation by a Medical ProviderNo0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026