Skip to content

A Comparison of Intravascular Injection With Chiba Needle and Whitacre Needle

A Comparison of Intravascular Injection With Chiba Needle and Whitacre Needle During Caudal Epidural Block : a Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04204720
Enrollment
164
Registered
2019-12-19
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2019-12-15
Last updated
2019-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disk Herniated Lumbar, Spinal Stenosis Lumbar

Brief summary

Caudal epidural injection (CEI) is effective for spinal pain. However, intravascular injection may occur during CEI, which can lead to hematoma, neurologic deficit and local anesthetics systemic toxicity. Whitacre type needle has been reported to be effective for reducing intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural injection. In this study, we compared the Chiba needle and Whitacre needle on incidence of intravascular injection during CEI.

Detailed description

A total of 164 caudal epidural injections were performed in patients with disc herniation or spinal stenosis on lumbosacral region. Patients were randomly allocated to Group Whitacre (n=82) and Group Chiba (n=82). Patients in Group Whitacre received caudal epidural injection using Whitacre type needle and those in Group Chiba received the procedure using Chiba type needle. Intravascular injection was assessed with blood aspiration and angiography during real-time fluoroscopy.

Interventions

DEVICEneedle (Chiba)

intravascular injection using chiba needle during caudal epidural block

DEVICEneedle (Whitacre)

intravascular injection using whitacre needle during caudal epidural block

Sponsors

Kyungpook National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with low back pain and/or leg radicular pain under diagnoses as disc herniation or spinal stenosis

Exclusion criteria

* allergy to local anesthetics or contrast medium, coagulopathy, local infection at the injection site, and systemic infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of intravascular injection5 minuteincidence of intravascular injection during caudal block

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026