Skip to content

Postoperative Electrical Muscle Stimulation (POEMS)

Postoperative Electrical Muscle Stimulation (POEMS) to Attenuate Muscle Atrophy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04199936
Acronym
POEMS
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-12-16
Start date
2020-11-18
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2021-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Atrophy, Postoperative Complications

Keywords

muscle, atrophy, postoperative, disuse, electrical muscle stimulation

Brief summary

Patients lose a significant amount of muscle following major abdominal surgery. This is partly due to a catabolic response to the surgical insult and inflammation, but is also probably due to a lack of muscle use secondary to immobility. This study will aim to assess whether some or even all of postoperative muscle loss in the upper leg muscle group is preventable through electrical muscle stimulation to mimic physical activity.

Detailed description

Following major gastrointestinal surgery patients may loose around 6 % of their skeletal muscle mass in the first 5 days. Whilst some of this loss is as a result of inflammation and starvation, some is due to muscle disuse. Studies have shown that patients spend 96% of their time being sedentary in the first 5 days following major abdominal surgery and by day 5 are still taking a median of less than 500 steps per day. Studies of healthy volunteers who undergo similar muscle disuse loose approximately 3.5% of skeletal muscle mass over the same time period, indicating that around half of postoperative muscle loss may be due to immobility. Through the use of electrical muscle stimulation, this study will aim to mimic high levels of exercise in the quadriceps of patients who have undergo major gastrointestinal surgery to see whether this reduces or prevents muscle loss. Patients muscles will be measured using ultrasound and DXA and neuromuscular function will be measured using electromyography.

Interventions

Electrical muscle stimulation

Sponsors

University of Nottingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

ultrasound images, DXA scans and EMG results will be given coded labeling by a separate researcher so that investigator analysing results will be blinded to whether scans / EMG results are from intervention or control leg, or start of finish.

Intervention model description

Single centre pilot study (randomised internal control trial)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients undergoing major segmental colonic resections or gastric/oesophageal resection * Sufficient mobility and fitness to complete normal enhanced recovery protocols following surgery * Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing neuromuscular disease (including parkinson's disease) * Pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator or other implanted nerve stimulator device * Metalwork in both upper legs * Dementia * Inability to give informed consent * Disability preventing normal mobilisation after surgery * Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease * Chronic kidney failure of chronic heart failure * Intubation for \> 24 hours post operation * Return to theatre for surgical complication within first 5 days post operation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor unit number estimates ((MUNE) as derived from surface EMG analysis)5 daysChanges in MUNE (as derived from surface EMG) in stimulated vs non stimulated legs of postoperative patients
Vastus Lateralis muscle thickness (cm)5 daysUltrasound scan (USS) measurement of Vastus Lateralis muscle thickness in stimulated vs non stimulated legs of postoperative patients
Vastus Lateralis muscle fibre length5 daysUSS measurement of Vastus Lateralis muscle fibre length in stimulated vs non stimulated legs of postoperative patients
Vastus Lateralis muscle fibre pennation angle5 daysUSS measurement of Vastus Lateralis muscle fibre pennation angle in stimulated vs non stimulated legs of postoperative patients
Compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) as measured by surface electromyography5 daysChanges in compound muscle action potentials (as detected by EMG) in stimulated vs non stimulated legs of postoperative patients
Near Fibre Motor Unit Potentials as measured by surface EMG5 daysChanges in motor unit potentials (as detected by EMG) in stimulated vs non stimulated legs of postoperative patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical activity levels in postoperative patients5 daysPhysical activity levels of patients following major gastrointestinal resection surgery on each postoperative day as measured by physical activity monitor
Dietary intake in postoperative patients5 daysDietary intake of patients following major gastrointestinal resection surgery, as recorded by patient food diary on each postoperative day
Inflammatory response following major abdominal surgery5 daysInflammatory response (as measured by IL6, TNFalfa and CRP) following major gastrointestinal resection surgery and its correlation with degree of skeletal muscle loss
Acceptability of electrical muscle stimulation in postoperative patients5 daysPatient experience of electrical muscle stimulation following major gastrointestinal resection surgery as measured by visual analogue score measures of patient comfort, distress, harmful effects and enjoyment.
Lean muscle mass5 daysDXA measurements of lean muscle mass in upper leg of stimulated vs non stimulated legs of postoperative patients

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactEdward J Hardy, MBBCh
edward.hardy@nhs.net07890429460
Backup ContactBethan E Phillips, PhD
beth.phillips@nottingham.ac.uk01332724676

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026