Skip to content

Sensors for Communication for Persons Who Cannot Communicate Unequivocally

The Use of Sensors to Improve Communication for Persons With Intellectual Disability Who Cannot Communicate Unequivocally

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04199299
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-12-13
Start date
2020-02-01
Completion date
2032-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Intellectual Disability

Brief summary

Some persons with intellectual disability or comprehensive cerebral palsy cannot communicate unequivocally how they are, how they react to situations and people, whether they are in pain or experience discomfort, anger or fear. Their modes of communication (sounds, grimacing etc) may be unintelligible or ambiguous to their caregivers. With the use of heart and/or respiration monitors the investigators aim to give these persons a means to communicate their immediate reactions or responses. The respiration monitor is meant to register sleep at night, so that the participants can communicate whether they have slept well or not the previous night.

Detailed description

Heart rate (HR) is considered to reflect a persons autonomic response to situations, whether external (what happens around us) or internal (pain or pleasure, joy or fear). Some persons with severe intellectual disability or comprehensive cerebral palsy or childhood autism cannot communicate unequivocally, either because they lack the cognitive prerequisites and language or because they lack control over their muscles used for speech. The investigators believe that these persons, through their heart rate, as registered with a commercially available chest belt or wrist watch, may communicate something about their well being and their reactions, preferences, aversions and fears. Many persons with intellectual disability, comprehensive cerebral palsy or childhood autism (the participants in this study) have sleep problems, but these may go unnoticed. Participants often have a fixed schedule for the day, and this is carried out irrespective of the shape they are in, e.g. irrespective of how well they have slept the night before. The challenges may then be too much for a sleep-deprived person, and frustration and even self harm and aggressive behavior may be the result. With the use of a respiration monitor that assesses sleep from the person's breathing pattern, the person in question may be able to communicate to her/his caregivers how the previous night's sleep was. Information about heart rate and sleep may contribute to better care and health services for persons who are unable to communicate unequivocally because of intellectual disability, autism and/or cerebral palsy.

Interventions

DEVICEHeart rate and respiration rate sensors

The use of sensors to monitor physiological variables (e.g. heart rate, sleep). The design is a before-and-after comparison with respect to whether the use of sensors has changed the caregivers' practice and their (perceived) understanding of the participant. The frequency of participants' self harm or aggressive behavior after as compared to before the introduction of pulse- and respiration monitors will also be charted.

Sponsors

University of Oslo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* intellectual disability with or without autism and/or cerebral palsy that render the participant unable to communicate his/her needs and reactions unequivocally.

Exclusion criteria

* allergic skin reaction to chest strap

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caregivers' practice detailed in structured interview10 yearsDoes the practice of the care for persons who cannot communicate unequivocally change after introduction of pulse- and respiration sensors? These questions are addressed in a structured interview with caregivers prior to and 2 months after the introduction of pulse- and respiration sensors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caregivers' understanding of the user detailed in structured interview10 yearsDoes introduction of pulse- and respiration sensors to allow participants to communicate pain, anxiety, sleeplessness etc., change caregivers' understanding of the participants' situation, needs and personality? These questions are addressed in a structured interview with caregivers prior to and 2 months after the introduction of pulse- and respiration sensors.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of self harm or aggressive behavior measured by daily registration10 yearsSelf harm and aggressive behavior are registered daily in the participants' dwellings, offering a means of comparing the frequency of such behavior before and after the introduction of pulse - and respiration sensors.

Countries

Norway

Contacts

Primary ContactBjørnar Hassel, PhD
bjornar.hassel@medisin.uio.no004798829754
Backup ContactEmilie SM Kildal
eskildal@sv.uio.no004745481949

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026