Periapical Abscess
Conditions
Keywords
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Microsurgery, Bone Regeneration, Biocompatible Materials
Brief summary
This prospective comparative randomized clinical trial compares healing and bony regeneration in patients who received 1 of 3 different retrograde filling materials following microsurgical apicoectomies for the treatment of periapical lesions of endodontic origin.
Detailed description
A prospective comparative randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the healing and bony regeneration in patients who received 1 of 3 different retrograde filling materials (EndoSequence®, ProRoot® MTA, or Biodentine®) following microsurgical apicoectomies for the treatment of periapical lesions of endodontic origin.
Interventions
The EndoSequence® retrograde sealing material was used to provide a biologic seal at the apex.
The ProRoot® MTA retrograde sealing material was used to provide a biologic seal at the apex.
The Biodentine® retrograde sealing material was used to provide a biologic seal at the apex.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I and II * Any tooth with a single chronic periapical lesion requiring apical microsurgery * Informed consent signed prior to surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Background of drug/alcohol abuse * Adjacent periapical lesion * Periodontal disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of remineralization | 6 months | The pace at which new bone is redeposited |