Skip to content

EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage Instead of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. A Feasibility Study.

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Instead of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04197908
Acronym
EGDB
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-12-13
Start date
2019-11-29
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2026-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Cholecystitis

Keywords

Acute cholecystitis, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gallbladder polyp, gallstone

Brief summary

To evaluate the feasibility of performing EGBD as a treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis in patients that are indicated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed description

The gold standard for treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Recently, gallbladder drainage with EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD) has been described as a treatment option. However, whether this is an effective treatment option in surgically fit patients are uncertain. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the feasibility of performing EGBD as a treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis in patients that are indicated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The investigators hypothesis that the technique is safe and feasible.

Interventions

As listed in the arms description

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Consecutive healthy patients aged ≥ 18 years old suffering from acute calculous cholecystitis indicated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy would be included.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments * Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder * Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal) * Patients with duodenal obstruction * Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum * Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices * Abnormal coagulation: international normalised ratio (INR) \> 1.5 and/or platelets \< 50.000/mm3 * Previous drainage of the gallbladder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical success rate30 daysComplete resolution of acute cholecystitis as defined by resolution of fever, pain and change of white cell counts of 10%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical success rate30 daysDefined as successful placement of a metal stent between the gallbladder and the duodenum or the stomach
30-day adverse events rate30 daysAdverse events would be graded according to the lexicon of endoscopic adverse events
Stone or polyp recurrences3 yearsAn ultrasonography of the abdomen would also be arranged yearly to check for recurrence of stones or polyps.
Quality of life scores: Gastrointestinal quality of life index3 yearsGastrointestinal quality of life index
Mortality rate3 yearsDeath from any cause
Reintervention rate3 yearsThe number of patients requiring biliary related re-interventions within 3 years.

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnthony Teoh

CUHK

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026