Skip to content

Postoperative Pain After the Use of Different Last Irrigation Method During Root Canal Treatment in Primary Teeth

A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of EndoActivator and Endodontic Syringe Usage on Postoperative Pain in Root Canal Irrigations in Primary Molar Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04197531
Enrollment
110
Registered
2019-12-13
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2019-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain

Keywords

EndoActivator, Irrigation, Postoperative pain, Primary teeth

Brief summary

This study was to evaluate and compare the postoperative pain levels after using EndoActivator and conventional endodontic syringe irrigation in root canal therapy of primary molars.

Interventions

OTHERIrrigation Method

Irrigation Method

Sponsors

TC Erciyes University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients exhibiting positive or definitely positive behavior on the Frankl's behavior rating scale (rating 3 or 4 on the Frankl's scale) * American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 patients aged 5-9 years * Patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of maxillary primary molars confirmed using periapical radiographs, percussion, and cold test * Patients having teeth with two-thirds of each root remaining * Absence of periapical lesions and interradicular radiolucency * Moderate to very severe (2-4) five-face scale pain scores in the 24-hour period before the procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who had taken analgesics and antibiotics within the last 12 hours before root canal treatment * Teeth with pathologic root resorption * Teeth with excessive mobility.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 72th hours72th hoursPain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.
Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 8th hours8th hoursPain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.
Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 24th hours24th hoursPain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.
Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 48th hours48th hoursPain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 0-8 hours.0-8 hoursThe patients were asked to choose one of the two options: 0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics, 1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep.
Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 8-24 hours.8-24 hoursThe patients were asked to choose one of the two options: 0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics, 1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep.
Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 24-48 hours.24-48 hoursThe patients were asked to choose one of the two options: 0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics, 1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep.
Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 48-72 hours.48-72 hoursThe patients were asked to choose one of the two options: 0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics, 1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026