Skip to content

The Minimal Effective Volume (MEV90) of Ropivacaine 0.75% for Ultrasound-guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block

The Minimal Effective Volume (MEV90) of Ropivacaine 0.75% for Ultrasound-guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Unilateral Percutaneous Nephrolitotomy: a Study Protocol for a Dose Finding Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04196270
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-12-12
Start date
2020-01-05
Completion date
2020-11-01
Last updated
2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Keywords

dose finding study

Brief summary

This double-blind dose-finding trial is based on a biased coin up-and-down sequential design, where the volume of local anesthetic administered to each patient depends on the response from the previous one. The TQL block is performed preoperatively, and the first patient recruited receives 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75%. In case of block failure, the next patient will receive a higher volume (defined as the previous volume with an increment of 2 mL). Given a successful block for the first patient, the next patient will be randomized to either a lower volume (defined as the previous volume with a reduction of 2 mL) or the same volume as the previous patient. The respective probabilities being b=0.11 for a reduced volume and 1-b=0.89 for the same volume. Block success is defined as patient reported numeric rated scale (NRS) pain (NRS value ≤ 3 (0-10/10)), 30 minutes after arrival in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). The NRS pain value is our primary and only outcome in the evaluation of the block. A minimum of 25 eligible patients are needed to achieve precise estimation of MEV90 with narrow 95% confidence intervals derived by bootstrapping. Following inclusion of 25 patients early termination is considered when interim analysis shows sufficiently stabilization of MEV90 estimate. The final sample size is not known a priori, but a maximum of 40 patients will be enrolled in the trial.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine injection

In a dose finding study the total volume of ropivacaine changes according to the biased coin up-and-down sequential design

Sponsors

Zealand University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Double-blind

Intervention model description

The biased coin up-and-down sequential design (BCD) should be considered for direct determination of higher quantiles (ED90 and ED95) which provide useful clinical knowledge. The BCD was developed in the field of pharmacology and toxicology and was formulated by Durham et al. in 1997. In the BCD, volume assignment is carried out in a sequential and interactive method, which avoids that patients are randomized to doses with toxicity risk and seeks to concentrate treatments around the suitable doses.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients eligible for the trail must comply with all of the following requirements to be included: * Scheduled for elective PNL surgery in general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil * Age \> 18 years at the date of inclusion * Have received thorough information, oral and written, and signed the informed consent form on participation in the trail * ASA score 1-3

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to speak and understand Danish * Allergy to local anesthetics or opioids * Daily intake of opioids (evaluated by the investigators) * Drug and/or substance abuse * Local infection at the site of injection or systemic infection * Difficult visualization of muscular and fascial structures necessary for successful block administration * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric rated scale30 minutes after arrival in the post anesthesia care unitPain score from numeric rated scale 0-10/10 Pain score, numeric rated scale 0-10/10. 0=no pain, 10=maximum pain

Contacts

Primary ContactJens B Børglum, PhD
jens.borglum@gmail.com+4530700120

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026