Skip to content

To Compare Artificial Intelligence Software Aided Adenoma Detection in Screening Colonoscopies Versus Standard Colonoscopy Without Artificial Intelligence Software Assistance in Participants Between 45 and 75 Years of Age

AIDA: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Detection of Adenomas (AIDA) With Standard High Definition With Light in Screening Colonoscopy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04196088
Acronym
AIDA
Enrollment
978
Registered
2019-12-12
Start date
2020-06-11
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Adenocarcinoma, Colorectal Adenoma, Colorectal Polyp, Colorectal SSA

Keywords

screening colonoscopy, artificial intelligence, software as a medical device, adenoma detection rate, adenomas per endoscopy, mean adenomas per colonoscopy, colorectal cancer, medical device

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of Ultivision Artificial Intelligence (AI) Software in detecting adenomas in screening colonoscopy procedures. The safety of Ultivision AI Software will also be assessed. A subset of the subjects will enter a roll-in period for clinical trial safety assessment. The remainder of subjects who are eligible will enter the detection phase which comprises a screening colonoscopy procedure. In the detection phase, subjects will be randomized to a screening colonoscopy with Ultivision AI Software enhancement or without AI Software enhancement. The study will measure the mean adenomas per colonoscopy procedure, as defined by the protocol, detected while receiving either treatment option.

Interventions

DEVICEUltivision Artificial Intelligence Software

Screening Colonoscopy

DEVICENo Artificial Intelligence Software enhancement

Screening Colonoscopy

Sponsors

Docbot, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Triple (Participant, Pathologist, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Primary Inclusion Criteria. 1. Average risk asymptomatic subjects undergoing a first colonoscopy (screening) or screening colonoscopy at least 10 years after prior colonoscopy. 2. Aged 45 years to aged 75 years at the time of enrollment. 3. Capable of providing written informed consent and willing and able to adhere to all protocol requirements, and/or the subject's legally acceptable representative(s) capable of providing written informed consent. Primary

Exclusion criteria

. 1. History of any colorectal cancer or colon adenomas. 2. History of inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. 3. Family history of colon cancer or precancerous colon polyp in a first degree relative before age 50. 4. Polyposis syndromes including Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Cowden syndrome, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, MUTYH Associated Polyposis, Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X. 5. Surveillance, therapeutic, preoperative, or diagnostic colonoscopy. 6. Colonoscopy for work-up of abdominal or pelvic symptoms including abdominal pain, flank pain, pelvic pain, subject report of altered stool, subject report of anemia within the past 12 months, subject report of gastrointestinal bleeding including bright red blood per rectum or tarry stools, constipation, diarrhea, subject reported history of abdominal or pelvic mass, subject report of unintentional weight loss. 7. Workup or referral to diagnose or evaluate abnormal imaging of the abdomen or pelvis. 8. Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test history. 9. Severe co-mobordity, including end-stage cardiovascular, pulmonary, liver, or renal disease. 10. History of colon resection, not including the appendix. 11. Currently receiving a therapy not permitted during the trial, as defined in Section 8.3. 12. Any issue that, in the opinion of the investigator, would render the subject unsuitable for participation in the trial. Enrolled subjects will be eligible for Post-procedure Periods if their colonoscopy meets the following criteria: 1. Adequate bowel preparation score per the Boston Bowel Preparation Scoring System (BBPS) \> or equal to 2 in all colonic segments. 2. Colonoscopies with successful cecal intubation. 3. Colonoscopies with withdrawal times of at least 6 minutes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall adenoma detection, as defined by the protocol, using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearThe primary efficacy endpoint is the mean adenomas per colonoscopy procedure (MAP) detection, as defined by the protocol, with Ultivision AI software enhancement to screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.
Overall adenomas per extraction, as defined by the protocol, using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard hiigh definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearThe primary safety endpoint is the adenomas per extraction per colonoscopy procedure (APE), as defined by the protocol, using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus SHDWLC without AI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adenoma detection rate, as defined by the protocol, using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearThe secondary efficacy endpoint is the adenoma detection rate (ADR) defined as the ratio of screening colonoscopies with at least one adenoma, as defined by the protocol, detected divided by the total number of screening SHDWLC performed with Ultivision AI versus screening SHDWLC performed without AI.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flat versus polypoid lesion detection rate using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearFlat versus polypoid lesion detection rate on SHDWLC AI versus SHDWLC without AI.
Polyp location distribution using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearPolyp location distribution on SHDWLC using AI versus SHDWLC without AI.
Advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearAdvanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) on SHDWLC using AI versus SHDWLC without AI.
Post colonoscopy recommended surveillance follow-up interval using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearRecommended surveillance interval after using SHDWLC AI versus SHDWLC without AI.
Colonoscope withdrawal time using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearColonoscope withdrawal time using SHDWLC AI versus SHDWLC without AI.
Surveillance-irrelevant lesion (SIL) and surveillance-relevant lesion (SRL) detection rate using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearSurveillance-irrelevant lesion (SIL) and surveillance-relevant lesion (SRL) detection rates using SHDWLC AI versus SHDWLC without AI.
Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) detection rate using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearSessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) detection rate on SHDWLC using AI versus SHDWLC without AI.
Polyp detection rate using Ultivision AI software in subjects undergoing screening standard high definition white light colonoscopy (SHDWLC) versus screening SHDWLC without AI.through study completion, an average of 1 yearPolyp detection rate on SHDWLC using AI versus SHDWLC without AI.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactEfren Rael, MD
efren.rael@docbot.ai7179030979
Backup ContactAndrew Ninh
andrew.ninh@docbot.ai7147166674

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026