Skip to content

Refitting Frequent Replacement Lens Wearers Into Clariti 1 Day And 1-Day Acuvue Moist Daily Disposable Spherical Lenses

Refitting Frequent Replacement Lens Wearers Into Clariti 1 Day And 1-Day Acuvue Moist Daily Disposable Spherical Lenses (BEAGLE 2)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04195893
Enrollment
56
Registered
2019-12-12
Start date
2019-11-24
Completion date
2020-03-11
Last updated
2020-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the performance of somofilcon A to etafilcon A when worn on a daily disposable wear modality over a period of approximately one week.

Detailed description

The study is a prospective, double masked (investigator and participant), bilateral, randomized, cross-over dispensing study, which evaluates somofilcon A (test lens) and etafilcon A (control lens).

Interventions

Contact Lens

DEVICEetafilcon A

Contact Lens

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects will only be eligible for the study if: 1. Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer; 2. Has read and signed an information consent letter; 3. Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; 4. Habitually wears silicone hydrogel frequent replacement soft contact lenses, for minimum of 6-months; 5. Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with the study lenses; 6. Can be fit with study contact lenses with a power between - 0.50 and -10.00 DS; 7. Demonstrates an acceptable fit with the study lenses; 8. Habitually wears contact lenses for at least 8 hours per day, and willing to wear contact lenses for at least 12 hours a day in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if: 1. Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study; 2. Has any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection; 3. Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 4. Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 5. Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study; 6. Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (verbal confirmation at the screening visit); 7. Is aphakic; 8. Has undergone refractive error surgery; 9. Is an employee of the Centre for Ocular Research & Education; 10. Has participated in the BEAGLE (EX-MKTG-104) study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Handling for Lens InsertionDay 1Lens handling for lens insertion (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)
Lens Handling for Lens RemovalDay 1Lens handling for lens removal (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens CentrationBaseline (after 10 minutes of lens fitting)Lens Centration was measured on a scale of 0-3 (0 - optimal, 1 - slight decentration, 2- moderate decentration but not encroaching limbus, 3 - excessive & occasionally encroaching limbus)
Post-blink MovementBaseline (after 10 minutes of lens fitting)Post-blink movement in primary gaze, in 0.1mm steps
Push-up TightnessBaseline (after 10 minutes of lens fitting)Push-up tightness in primary gaze was measured using a scale 0-100 (5% steps) (0% = falls from cornea without lid support, 50% = optimum, 100% = no movement)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens InsertionBaselineSubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion was measured on a scale of 0-10 (0-Painful, 10- Can't feel the lenses).

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Total Participants
56
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Second InterventionWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
56 Participants
Age, Continuous27.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
56 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 550 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 550 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 550 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Insertion

Lens handling for lens insertion (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Insertion

Lens handling for lens insertion (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: Day 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Insertion

Lens handling for lens insertion (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: Day 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Insertion

Lens handling for lens insertion (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: 1 Week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Insertion8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Removal

Lens handling for lens removal (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Removal

Lens handling for lens removal (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: Day 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Removal

Lens handling for lens removal (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: Day 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Lens Handling for Lens Removal

Lens handling for lens removal (subjective rating; 0 - 10 integer scale, 0 - very difficult, 10 - very easy)

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Etafilcon ALens Handling for Lens Removal9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Lens Centration

Lens Centration was measured on a scale of 0-3 (0 - optimal, 1 - slight decentration, 2- moderate decentration but not encroaching limbus, 3 - excessive & occasionally encroaching limbus)

Time frame: Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens fitting)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Centration0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Etafilcon ALens Centration0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Lens Centration

Lens Centration was measured on a scale of 0 - 3 (0-optimal, 1-slight decentration, 2-moderate decentration but not encroaching limbus, 3-excessive & occasionally encroaching limbus)

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ALens Centration0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Etafilcon ALens Centration0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Post-blink Movement

Post-blink movement in primary gaze, in 0.1mm steps

Time frame: Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens fitting)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon APost-blink Movement0.3 millimetersStandard Deviation 0.1
Etafilcon APost-blink Movement0.3 millimetersStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Post-blink Movement

Post-blink movement in primary gaze, in 0.1mm steps

Time frame: 1 -week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon APost-blink Movement0.3 millimetersStandard Deviation 0.1
Etafilcon APost-blink Movement0.3 millimetersStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Push-up Tightness

Push-up tightness in primary gaze was measured using a scale 0-100 (5% steps) (0% = falls from cornea without lid support, 50% = optimum, 100% = no movement)

Time frame: Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens fitting)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon APush-up Tightness51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Etafilcon APush-up Tightness49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Push-up Tightness

Push-up tightness in primary gaze was measured using a scale 0-100 (5% steps) (0% = falls from cornea without lid support, 50% = optimum, 100% = no movement)

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon APush-up Tightness52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Etafilcon APush-up Tightness48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion was measured on a scale of 0-10 (0-Painful, 10- Can't feel the lenses).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Etafilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion was measured on a scale of 0-10 (0-Painful, 10- Can't feel the lenses).

Time frame: 1 Day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Etafilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion was measured on a scale of 0-10 (0-Painful, 10- Can't feel the lenses).

Time frame: Day 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Etafilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion was measured on a scale of 0-10 (0-Painful, 10- Can't feel the lenses).

Time frame: Day 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Etafilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion

Subjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion was measured on a scale of 0-10 (0-Painful, 10- Can't feel the lenses).

Time frame: 1-Week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Somofilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Etafilcon ASubjective Ratings of Comfort After Lens Insertion8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026