Skip to content

Trial of the Families Moving Forward (FMF) Connect Mobile Health Intervention

Feasibility Trial of the FMF Connect Mobile Health Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04194489
Enrollment
171
Registered
2019-12-11
Start date
2020-01-31
Completion date
2021-07-31
Last updated
2023-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test a new smartphone app for parents/caregivers of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). The app is called Families Moving Forward (FMF) Connect. The goal of the app is to provide parents/caregivers with useful information to help manage their children's condition and obtain peer support.

Interventions

The FMF Connect intervention includes cloud infrastructure and an innovative, multilayered mobile app. It incorporates tailored content for parents/caregivers of children (ages 3-12) with FASD or PAE. The app integrates five main components: 1) Dashboard; 2) Learning Modules; 3) Family Forum; 4) Library; and 5) Notebook. Weekly emails are also sent to support motivational engagement.

Sponsors

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Biological parent or other primary caregiver (e.g., foster or adoptive parent, relative, legal guardian) of a child with FASD or prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) * The parent/caregiver must be at least 18 years old * The child must between the ages of 3 and 12 years old * The child has a diagnosis of FASD or has confirmed PAE * The child has lived with the parent/caregiver for at least 4 months and is expected to remain in the home for at least 1 year * The parent/caregiver lives in the United States * The parent/caregiver has a smartphone with iOS or Android operating system

Exclusion criteria

* The parent/caregiver is not fluent in English (the FMF Connect app and pre-post measures are currently only available in English) * There is another parent/caregiver of the same child or living in the home that is already enrolled in the study (couples are excluded to prevent dependence in the data) * The family has previously received or is currently receiving the therapist-led Families Moving Forward (FMF) Program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-Upbaseline to 3-month follow-upThe Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory measures the intensity of child behavior problems. Scores are presented as T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 60 or higher is considered clinically significant. Higher scores indicate more intense behavior problems. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.
Parenting Sense of Competence - Satisfaction Sub-scale at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-upbaseline to 3-month follow-upThe Parenting sense of competence scale includes two sub-scales: 1) satisfaction and 2) efficacy. The satisfaction sub-scale reported here includes 9 items, rated on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Responses are summed, with possible sub-scale score range from 9 to 54 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction in the parenting role. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.
Parenting Sense of Competence - Efficacy Sub-scale Baseline to 3-Month Follow-upbaseline to 3-month follow-upThe Parenting sense of competence scale includes two sub-scales: 1) satisfaction and 2) efficacy. The efficacy sub-scale reported here measures how effective parents feel they are and includes 7 items, rated on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Responses are summed, with possible sub-scale score range from 7 to 42 with higher scores indicating lower feelings of efficacy. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.
Family Needs Questionnaire Baseline to 3-Month Follow-upbaseline to 3-month follow-upThe family needs questionnaire measures the degree to which family needs are met. The scale includes 20 items reflecting family needs that are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with 0 being not applicable to 4 being met a great deal. The total score on this measure is created by averaging across all items. Total score ranges from 0-4. Higher scores reflect more needs being met. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Perception of Self-care Change Over Intervention Period Reported at 3-month Follow-up3-month follow-upParticipants are asked at follow-up to rate how much their self-care practices have changed over the last 3 months on a 5-point scale ranging from A lot less self-care (1) to A lot more self-care (5). A score of 3 equates to no change.
Mean App Quality Score on Mobile App Rating Scale: User Version3-month follow-upThe mobile app rating scale includes a measure of users perception of app quality. There are 16 items contributing to this score, each rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Total app quality score is presented as a mean with range of 1 to 5, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived quality of the app. .

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were asked to complete an eConsent and several screening questionnaires in REDCap. A total of 66 did not proceed to assignment to study arm for the following reasons: 24 did not meet eligibility criteria, 38 had incomplete data so eligibility was not able to be determined, 3 chose to wait for the subsequent RCT, and 1 was overlooked due to study team error.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FMF Connect Intervention
FMF Connect: The FMF Connect intervention includes cloud infrastructure and an innovative, multilayered mobile app. It incorporates tailored content for parents/caregivers of children (ages 3-12) with FASD or PAE. The app integrates five main components: 1) Dashboard; 2) Learning Modules; 3) Family Forum; 4) Library; and 5) Notebook. Weekly emails are also sent to support motivational engagement.
100
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up48
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFMF Connect Intervention
Age, Continuous46.48 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.72
Child Age8.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.62
Child Ethnicity
Hispanic / Latinx
16 Participants
Child Ethnicity
Not Hispanic / Latinx
80 Participants
Child Ethnicity
Unknown
4 Participants
Child Race
African American / Black
6 Participants
Child Race
Asian
2 Participants
Child Race
More Than One Race
23 Participants
Child Race
Native American / Alaska Native
6 Participants
Child Race
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Child Race
Unknown
3 Participants
Child Race
White
59 Participants
Child Sex at Birth
Female
39 Participants
Child Sex at Birth
Male
61 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory - Intensity69.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94
Family Needs Met Scale2.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
Parenting Sense of Competence Scale - Efficacy21.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.48
Parenting Sense of Competence Scale - Satisfaction34.29 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.43
Phone Operating System
Android
38 Participants
Phone Operating System
Apple iOS
62 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
92 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 participants
Relationship to Child
Adoptive Parent
83 participants
Relationship to Child
Biological Parent
3 participants
Relationship to Child
Foster Parent
7 participants
Relationship to Child
Grandparent
7 participants
Relationship to Child
Other Relative
8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 105
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-Up

The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory measures the intensity of child behavior problems. Scores are presented as T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A T-score of 60 or higher is considered clinically significant. Higher scores indicate more intense behavior problems. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.

Time frame: baseline to 3-month follow-up

Population: Data was analyzed from participants with complete data on the measure from both timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FMF Connect InterventionEyberg Child Behavior Inventory at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-UpBaseline69.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.29
FMF Connect InterventionEyberg Child Behavior Inventory at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-UpFollow-up65.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.81
Comparison: Cohen's d effect size was calculated using baseline and follow-up means and standard deviations. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.
Primary

Family Needs Questionnaire Baseline to 3-Month Follow-up

The family needs questionnaire measures the degree to which family needs are met. The scale includes 20 items reflecting family needs that are rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with 0 being not applicable to 4 being met a great deal. The total score on this measure is created by averaging across all items. Total score ranges from 0-4. Higher scores reflect more needs being met. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.

Time frame: baseline to 3-month follow-up

Population: Data was analyzed from participants with complete data on the measure from both timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FMF Connect InterventionFamily Needs Questionnaire Baseline to 3-Month Follow-upBaseline2.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
FMF Connect InterventionFamily Needs Questionnaire Baseline to 3-Month Follow-upFollow-up2.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Comparison: Cohen's d effect size was calculated using baseline and follow-up means and standard deviations. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.
Primary

Parenting Sense of Competence - Efficacy Sub-scale Baseline to 3-Month Follow-up

The Parenting sense of competence scale includes two sub-scales: 1) satisfaction and 2) efficacy. The efficacy sub-scale reported here measures how effective parents feel they are and includes 7 items, rated on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Responses are summed, with possible sub-scale score range from 7 to 42 with higher scores indicating lower feelings of efficacy. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.

Time frame: baseline to 3-month follow-up

Population: Data was analyzed from participants with complete data on the measure from both timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FMF Connect InterventionParenting Sense of Competence - Efficacy Sub-scale Baseline to 3-Month Follow-upBaseline22.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.01
FMF Connect InterventionParenting Sense of Competence - Efficacy Sub-scale Baseline to 3-Month Follow-upFollow-up20.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Comparison: Cohen's d effect size was calculated using baseline and follow-up means and standard deviations. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.
Primary

Parenting Sense of Competence - Satisfaction Sub-scale at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-up

The Parenting sense of competence scale includes two sub-scales: 1) satisfaction and 2) efficacy. The satisfaction sub-scale reported here includes 9 items, rated on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Responses are summed, with possible sub-scale score range from 9 to 54 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction in the parenting role. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.

Time frame: baseline to 3-month follow-up

Population: Data was analyzed from participants with complete data on the measure from both timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FMF Connect InterventionParenting Sense of Competence - Satisfaction Sub-scale at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-upBaseline32.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.18
FMF Connect InterventionParenting Sense of Competence - Satisfaction Sub-scale at Baseline and 3-Month Follow-upFollow-up34.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
Comparison: Cohen's d effect size was calculated using baseline and follow-up means and standard deviations. An effect size of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium and 0.8 is large.
Secondary

Mean App Quality Score on Mobile App Rating Scale: User Version

The mobile app rating scale includes a measure of users perception of app quality. There are 16 items contributing to this score, each rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Total app quality score is presented as a mean with range of 1 to 5, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived quality of the app. .

Time frame: 3-month follow-up

Population: Data was analyzed from participants with complete data on the measure at the 3-month follow-up timepoint. Data was missing for 2 participants on this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FMF Connect InterventionMean App Quality Score on Mobile App Rating Scale: User Version4.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Secondary

Participant Perception of Self-care Change Over Intervention Period Reported at 3-month Follow-up

Participants are asked at follow-up to rate how much their self-care practices have changed over the last 3 months on a 5-point scale ranging from A lot less self-care (1) to A lot more self-care (5). A score of 3 equates to no change.

Time frame: 3-month follow-up

Population: Data was analyzed from participants with complete data on the measure at the 3-month follow-up timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FMF Connect InterventionParticipant Perception of Self-care Change Over Intervention Period Reported at 3-month Follow-up2.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026