Spinal Cord Injuries
Conditions
Keywords
Spinal Cord Injuries, Trans-cranial magnetic stimulation, Trans-spinal direct current stimulation
Brief summary
This study is to investigate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with trans-spinal electrical stimulation (tsES) intervention on cortical excitability, brain structure, motor ability of lower limb in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Twelve participants will be recruited in this study.
Detailed description
Spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs motor and sensory function and affects numerous body functions and daily activities. Insufficient central nervous system plasticity can result in maladaptive changes that prevent full recovery. It's a challenge to guide this plasticity to optimize the functional outcome for individuals with SCI. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and trans-spinal electric stimulation (tsES) may modulate cortical excitability, corticospinal output and spinal circuit. However, few studies investigated the effectiveness of paired nerve stimulation (PNS) on neuroplasticity and functional outcome in persons with SCI. Therefore, this study aim to examine the effects of the combination of these two different non-invasive nerve stimulation with the cycling exercise on the motor cortex and corticospinal circuit excitability as well as functional recovery. Present study clarifies the effects of five different settings of combined with TMS and tsES intervention and then undergo cycling exercise after PNS on spinal cord and cortical excitability in SCI participants. It is expected that this project will successfully establish a new neuromodulation technology to enhance cortical, corticospinal and spinal circuit excitability as well as to improve the outcome of lower-limb function and quality of life in persons with SCI. Therefore, this project can not only publish scientific papers, but also can enhance the neuroplasticity and improve function in persons with SCI.
Interventions
DEVICE20 Hz rTMS (Brain)
Higher frequency (\>5 Hz) trains increase cortical excitability.
DEVICEiTBS rTMS (Brain)
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer rTMS approach.
DEVICEAnode tsDCS (Spinal)
Anodal tsDCS increased the spinal reflex amplitude, as well as corticospinal excitability.
DEVICE20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal)
Higher frequency (\>5 Hz) of current increase cortical excitability.
DEVICEiTBS (Spinal)
Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer approach. it may increase corticospinal excitability.
DEVICEsham
with sham stimulation on brain and spinal.
Sponsors
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age 20 to 65 years incomplete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA) B to D) 2. Lesion area above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10) 3. Injury time more than one year 4. Without range of motion (ROM) limitation 5. Medical condition stable
Exclusion criteria
1. Having pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy. 2. Having seizure history 3. Having other neurological, mental, medical problems affect this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) | Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished. | Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex. All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair. Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their one hand in the seated position. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimized site, stimuli are delivered over various points around the Cz (approximate 1 cm distance from Cz). The optimal site is the location around the Cz that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in tibialis anterior muscles. The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed. |
| Change of resting motor threshold (RMT) | Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished. | Resting motor threshold (RMT) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following transcranial magnetic stimulation. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points around the Cz (the distance approximate 1 cm from Cz) to get the hot spot point. And then measure the RMT using the minimum stimulus intensity that produced a minimal motor evoked response (about 50 micro-volts (µV) in at least 5 of 10 trials) at rest. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) | Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished. | Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Scoring is recorded as follows: 0: No increase in muscle tone 1. Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the Range of motion (ROM) 2. More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved 3. Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult 4. Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |
| Change of Lower Extremities Motor Score (LEMS) | Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished. | The voluntary muscle strength of five key muscles (hip flexors, knee extensors, ankle dorsiflexors, long toe extensors and ankle plantarflexors) of both lower extremities was tested. Each muscle was given a value between 0 and 5 according to the strength of voluntary muscle contraction. Maximum and minimum LEMS were 50 and 0, respectively. |
| Change of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) | Immediately after the intervention finished. | Our study will use 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging\[GE DISCOVERY MR750w system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin)\] for functional magnetic resonance imaging. Resting-state functional MRI image is an echo-planar Image (EPI) technique, using a parameter time of repetition of 2500 milliseconds, time of echo is 30 milliseconds, 43 axial slices, slice thickness is 3 mm, flip angle is 80 degrees, field of view is 192 × 192 mm, and vixen size is 3 × 3 × 3 mm. The EPI scan for 525 seconds. All subjects are asked to close their eyes and supine. Our study uses the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations analysis to confirm abnormal brain function. |
| Change of Surface Electromyography (sEMG) | Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished. | sEMG recordings using pairs of 1 cm-diameter silver/silver chloride recessed sEMG electrodes placed over the muscle bellies 3 cm apart were made from the right and left quadriceps (mainly rectus femoris) and hamstrings. Electrodes were centered on the long axis over muscle bellies for recording during voluntary motor tasks performed by 30 min cycling exercise. The 4 sEMG channels were recorded with a bandwidth of 30 to 500 Hz and a gain of 1,000. Movement sensor and event cue marker outputs were also recorded and, along with the sEMG, were continually digitized at a rate of 2,000 samples/s for the duration of the protocol. |
Countries
Taiwan
Contacts
Primary ContactChien-Hung Lai, MD PhD
Outcome results
None listed