Skip to content

Local Vibration in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

The Effect of Local Vibration Applied to Spastic Gastrocnemius on Muscle Architecture and Functional Properties in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04192786
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-12-10
Start date
2019-12-15
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Spasticity, Local Vibration, Muscle Architecture, Functionality

Brief summary

Gastrocnemius spasticity is one of the main complaints in Multiple Sclerosis patients.Local muscle vibration is a method used for spasticity inhibition. However, when the studies in the literature are examined; It is noted that local vibration applications for spasticity are usually single sessions and evaluate the acute effect, do not produce functional outputs, there is no consensus on frequency and amplitude and the changes in muscle architecture are not examined. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of local vibration applied on spastic gastrocnemius on muscle architectural and functional properties in Multiple Sclerosis patients in addition to the standard physiotherapy program. The study was planned to include 3 groups, 2 treatment and 1 control group. The control group will receive standard physiotherapy, one of the treatment groups will receive 50 Hz local vibration in addition to standard physiotherapy, and other treatment group will receive 100 Hz local vibration in addition to standard physiotherapy. Disease severity, gastrocnemius spasticity, architectural and viscoelastic properties of muscle, ankle proprioception, balance and gait skills will be evaluated before and after 8 weeks treatment program. As a result; effectiveness of local vibration in addition to standard physiotherapy program and whether there is a difference between applications at different frequencies will be examined.

Interventions

OTHERStandard physiotherapy program+50 Hz local vibration

Standard physiotherapy program (strength, balance, gait exercises) for 50 minutes and local vibration applied to gastrocnemius (50 Hz) for 10 minutes will be performed 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

OTHERStandard physiotherapy program+100 Hz local vibration

Standard physiotherapy program (strength, balance, gait exercises) for 50 minutes and local vibration applied to gastrocnemius (100 Hz) for 10 minutes will be performed 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

Standard physiotherapy program (strength, balance, gait exercises) for 60 minutes will be performed 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \> 18 years * EDSS\<5,5 * Gastrocnemius spasticity\<2

Exclusion criteria

* having any injury or surgery of the lower extremity * having systemic and metabolic disease * having behavioral and cognitive problems that prevent consistence to guidelines given

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Muscle Thickness and Fascicle Length with Ultrasonography3 minutesBilateral Medial Gastrocnemius US evaluations were performed with use of a 5-10 MHz linear probe (Diasus Dynamic Imaging Ltd, Livingston, Scotland,UK). Patients were positioned prone position with their legs and their muscles relaxed for medial gastrocnemius. Muscle Thickness and Fascicle Length would be expressed as centimeters.
Evaluation of Pennation Angle with Ultrasonography2 minutesBilateral Medial Gastrocnemius US evaluations were performed with use of a 5-10 MHz linear probe (Diasus Dynamic Imaging Ltd, Livingston, Scotland,UK). Patients were positioned prone position with their legs and their muscles relaxed for medial gastrocnemius. Pennation Angle would be angularly indicated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of ankle proprioception5 minutesIsokinetic dynamometer (Isomed 2000) (passive ankle joint position sense)
Assessment of single leg balance3 minutesSingle leg balance test
Assessment of spasticity5 minutesModified Ashworth Scale (minimum score 0 (worse), maximum score 4 (better))
Assessment of gait characterictics5 minutesGAITRite Analysis System (assessment of velocity, step length, percentage of gait cycle spent in double and single support, stance phase, swing phase, base of support)
Assessment of balance10 minutesBertec Balance Check ScreenerTM force platform system (Assessment of limits of stability, anteroposterior and mediolateral sway range)
Assessment of viscoelastic properties of muscle5 minutesMyoton-3 (assessment of tone, elasticity and stiffness)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactFatma Ayvat, MSc
fatma.avcu@hacettepe.edu.tr+905514252059

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026