Skip to content

Deep Learning for Prostate Segmentation

Multi-zone Computer-aided Prostate Segmentation on MR Images Using a Deep Learning-based Approach

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04191980
Acronym
GOPI-Segm
Enrollment
62
Registered
2019-12-10
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2019-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

prostate segmentation, MR images

Brief summary

Because the diagnostic criteria for prostate cancer are different in the peripheral and the transition zone, prostate segmentation is needed for any computer-aided diagnosis system aimed at characterizing prostate lesions on magnetic resonance (MR) images. Manual segmentation is time consuming and may differ between radiologists with different expertise. We developed and trained a convolutional neural network algorithm for segmenting the whole prostate, the transition zone and the anterior fibromuscular stroma on T2-weighted images of 787 MRIs from an existing prospective radiological pathological correlation database containing prostate MRI of patients treated by prostatectomy between 2008 and 2014 (CLARA-P database). The purpose of this study is to validate this algorithm on an independent cohort of patients.

Interventions

OTHERComparison of prostate multi-zone segmentation obtained with an automatic deep learning-based algorithm and two expert radiologists

The algorithm is used to perform a multizone segmentation of the prostate including delineation of : the whole prostate contours, the transition zone contours, the anterior fibromuscular stroma. The contours is independently corrected by 2 radiologists. The corrected contours of the different zones will be stored and for each zone 6 different metrics will be used to evaluate the difference between the initial and corrected contours: * Mean Mesh Distance: Average Boundary Distance (ABD) for each point of the reference segmentation. The distance to the closest point of the compared segmentation is first computed. Then the average of all these distances is computed and gives the ABD * General Hausdorff distance (HD) * 95% percentile (P) of the HD and the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD distribution * 95% HD modified (HD95\_1): different approach by first computing the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD then taking the maximum * Dice coefficient * Difference in volumes

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prostate MRI contained in the PACS of the Hospices Civils de Lyon * Performed in 2016-2019

Exclusion criteria

* MRIs from patients who already had treatment for prostate cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Mesh Distance (Mean) between the contours of the whole prostate made by the algorithm and the two radiologistsMonth 11The Mean Mesh Distance corresponds to the Average Boundary Distance (ABD) for each point of the reference segmentation. The distance to the closest point of the compared segmentation is first computed. Then the average of all these distances is computed and gives the ABD. The Mean Mesh Distance between the contours of the whole prostate made by the algorithm and each radiologist will be used as primary outcome measure.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactOlivier ROUVIERE, Pr
Olivier.rouviere@chu-lyon.fr472 11 61 67

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026