Skip to content

Neurofeedback in Individuals With Substance Use Disorders

Neurofeedback in Individuals With Substance Use Disorders

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04188288
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-12-05
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
2023-03-15
Last updated
2024-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid-Related Disorders

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to train individuals with opioid use disorder to control their brain activity in a way that has been associated with their symptoms. Participants in the experimental group will be given direct feedback regarding their brain activity while they are undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning, and will try to learn to control their brain activity during these feedback sessions. A separate group of participants will be given a control form of feedback that we do not believe can have clinical benefits. Our primary hypothesis is that the neurofeedback training will reduce opioid use and clinical features of opioid use disorder more than the control feedback.

Interventions

Participants provided with feedback of target brain activation patterns (for example, in the form of a line graph) and will be instructed to try to make the line go up or down.

Participants provided with control type of feedback (for example, in the form of a line graph) and will be instructed to try to make the line go up or down.

DEVICEfMRI

fMRI will be used to assess brain activity

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be blinded as to whether they are receiving experimental or control neurofeedback.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. non-methadone opioid positive urine screen (as assessed during standard treatment) or indicated via Utox or self-reported past-month opioid use at screening 2. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 criteria for opioid use disorder, as assessed via structured clinical interview (SCID) 3. ≥3 months of methadone treatment

Exclusion criteria

1. Having any current neurologic or psychiatric disorders including current moderate to severe other DSM-5 substance use disorders with the exceptions of opioids, cocaine, tobacco and cannabis, as assessed using the SCID. 2. Failure to pass a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening 3. Having significant underlying medical conditions requiring medications. 4. Women who are pregnant or nursing 5. Baseline scanning with excessive motion based on frame to frame displacement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid Use: Urine TestsBaseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (week 9)Opioid use will be monitored by weekly urine test. This will be assessed as the percentage of negative tests.
Opioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)Baseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (week 9)Opioid use assessed using the timeline followback method (TLFB). TLFB asks subjects to estimate drug use during a specific time period in the past. Number of participants positive or negative for drug use.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Functional Connectivity Patterns in the BrainBaseline (week 1) through follow up (week 5)This outcome will be assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. Opioid abstinence network connectivity strength will be calculated during resting state (H2a). (Data was not able to be collected at MIDT and Stroop tasks as intended.) 0 represents no engagement of the opioid abstinence network. As as a novel brain network measure, there are no defined clinical cutoffs for functional connectivity. Reported is the Z-score Fisher transformed correlation coefficient.
Mean Opioid Craving ScoreBaseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (*week 9*)This outcome will be measured with the Opioid Craving Scale, a 3-item measure of craving that uses a 0-10 analog scale. Total possible score is 0-30, with higher score indicating more craving.
Negative Affect Mean ScoreBaseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (week 9)This outcome will be measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. This is a 16-item measure, using a 0-3 scale for each item. Total possible score is 0-48, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

12 participants enrolled with one participant excluded prior to randomization

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Neurofeedback
Three imaging (fMRI) sessions of experimental feedback. Experimental feedback: Participants provided with feedback of target brain activation patterns (for example, in the form of a line graph) and will be instructed to try to make the line go up or down.
8
Control Feedback
Three imaging (fMRI) sessions of control feedback. Control feedback (sham): Participants provided with control type of feedback (for example, in the form of a line graph) and will be instructed to try to make the line go up or down.
3
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeurofeedbackControl FeedbackTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Opioid Craving Scale17.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
16.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
17.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology9.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
8.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
8.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants3 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Opioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)

Opioid use assessed using the timeline followback method (TLFB). TLFB asks subjects to estimate drug use during a specific time period in the past. Number of participants positive or negative for drug use.

Time frame: Baseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (week 9)

Population: Results presented here are for participants that had completed TLFB at both baseline and follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NeurofeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)BaselineNegative1 Participants
NeurofeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)BaselinePositive1 Participants
NeurofeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)Follow upPositive2 Participants
NeurofeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)Follow upNegative0 Participants
Control FeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)Follow upPositive2 Participants
Control FeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)BaselineNegative1 Participants
Control FeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)BaselinePositive1 Participants
Control FeedbackOpioid Use: Timeline Followback Method (TLFB)Follow upNegative0 Participants
Primary

Opioid Use: Urine Tests

Opioid use will be monitored by weekly urine test. This will be assessed as the percentage of negative tests.

Time frame: Baseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (week 9)

Population: One participant in the experimental group did not have any urine tests.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NeurofeedbackOpioid Use: Urine Tests17.9 percentage of negative tests
Control FeedbackOpioid Use: Urine Tests0 percentage of negative tests
Secondary

Mean Change in Functional Connectivity Patterns in the Brain

This outcome will be assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. Opioid abstinence network connectivity strength will be calculated during resting state (H2a). (Data was not able to be collected at MIDT and Stroop tasks as intended.) 0 represents no engagement of the opioid abstinence network. As as a novel brain network measure, there are no defined clinical cutoffs for functional connectivity. Reported is the Z-score Fisher transformed correlation coefficient.

Time frame: Baseline (week 1) through follow up (week 5)

Population: Results are reported for resting state as task data was not able to be collected as planned and for participants that completed all 5 scans.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeurofeedbackMean Change in Functional Connectivity Patterns in the Brain-11.2 Fisher Z-transform corr. coefficientStandard Deviation 13.4
Control FeedbackMean Change in Functional Connectivity Patterns in the Brain38.7 Fisher Z-transform corr. coefficientStandard Deviation 67.7
Secondary

Mean Opioid Craving Score

This outcome will be measured with the Opioid Craving Scale, a 3-item measure of craving that uses a 0-10 analog scale. Total possible score is 0-30, with higher score indicating more craving.

Time frame: Baseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (*week 9*)

Population: Results presented here is for participants that have both baseline and follow up data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeurofeedbackMean Opioid Craving ScoreBaseline18.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
NeurofeedbackMean Opioid Craving ScoreFollow up23.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Control FeedbackMean Opioid Craving ScoreBaseline16.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Control FeedbackMean Opioid Craving ScoreFollow up16.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Secondary

Negative Affect Mean Score

This outcome will be measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. This is a 16-item measure, using a 0-3 scale for each item. Total possible score is 0-48, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline (week 1) to one month post follow-up (week 9)

Population: Results presented here is for participants that have both baseline and follow up data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NeurofeedbackNegative Affect Mean ScoreBaseline12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
NeurofeedbackNegative Affect Mean ScoreFollow up14.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Control FeedbackNegative Affect Mean ScoreBaseline8.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Control FeedbackNegative Affect Mean ScoreFollow up6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026