Skip to content

TMS for the Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia

TMS in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Modulation of Brain Networks and Language

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04188067
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-12-05
Start date
2022-03-01
Completion date
2024-08-25
Last updated
2026-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia, Non-fluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia, Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia

Brief summary

Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a progressive syndrome in the family of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders involving devastating language impairments caused by selective neurodegeneration of the brain's language network. Unfortunately, there is no treatment for PPA. An exciting possibility for treatment is non-invasive repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS), which induces electric currents in degenerating brain networks, making them in some cases more efficient. Therapeutic benefits from rTMS have been demonstrated when it is applied in many sequential sessions. For example, repeated sessions of rTMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is approved by the US Food and Drug administration as a treatment for major depressive disorder. With respect to language, high frequency rTMS increases the response rate for picture naming in healthy individuals and in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Further, in a sham controlled study, Cotelli and colleagues demonstrated that in a group of 10 non-fluent PPA patients, high frequency rTMS over the left and right dlPFC improved the percent of correct responses for action naming. When rTMS was applied for five consecutive days in a sham controlled single case study, Finocchiaro and colleagues showed lasting improvements in language (up to 1 week) in a patient with non-fluent PPA. Trebbastoni and colleagues further showed the same lasting improvements in language (up to 1 week) in a patient with logopenic PPA. Recently, in a sham controlled single case study, Bereau and colleagues applied a more intense rTMS protocol for ten consecutive days and demonstrated significant linguistic improvements in a logopenic PPA patient that lasted for 1 month. These studies have contributed valuable insights into the potential use of rTMS in treating the language symptoms of PPA patients.

Detailed description

30 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PPA (non-fluent PPA, logopenic PPA or semantic PPA) (made by a specialized clinician) will be recruited. Patients must have a mild to moderate language impairment and must be native English speakers. Exclusion criteria include contraindications to receiving Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanning or rTMS (e.g. metallic or electromagnetically activated implants, cranial mass lesions, surgical aneurysm clips), the presence of significant medical, neurological or psychiatric co-morbid symptoms and patients without study partners. It will take approximately 4 weeks to complete this research study, but the exact timing will vary according to patient, investigator and equipment availability. Each patient will have a total of up to 21 study visits. Greater than 21 visits may take place in the event that patients' language improves significantly following rTMS in order to test the sustainability of the improvement. Visits will take place at the MGH Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging. The first visit (lasting 3-4 hours) will include obtainment of informed consent, baseline assessments, and a baseline MRI scan (which will be used for subsequent rTMS targeting). After this, patients will return for two blocks of 20Hz rTMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: one in which they receive active rTMS and one in which they receive sham rTMS. Both active and sham rTMS will be delivered as high frequency stimulation (20 hertz, 20Hz). To accomplish this, an rTMS coil capable of delivering active or sham stimulation will be employed. Order of active and sham blocks will be counterbalanced across participants. During each block rTMS (active or sham) will be administered daily for 10 days (Monday through Friday). Neuropsychological testing, including thorough language evaluations, will be done before treatment, after day 1 and day 10 of rTMS treatment. Repeat MRI imaging will be performed after day 1 and day 10 of rTMS treatment. rTMS visit durations will be as follows: Monday (day 1) visit will last approximately 3-4 hours. Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday and Friday visits (day 2 to day 9) will last approximately 1-2 hours. Friday visit (day 10) will last approximately 5 hours.

Interventions

DEVICEActive rTMS

All study participants will receive one block of ACTIVE rTMS. Each block will consist of daily sessions of active rTMS delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex over ten days (Monday through Friday).

DEVICESHAM rTMS

All study participants will receive one block of SHAM rTMS. Each block will consist of daily sessions of SHAM rTMS delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex over ten days (Monday through Friday).

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Through use of SHAM rTMS stimulation

Intervention model description

Within-subject crossover design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients, age 18-90, who carry a diagnosis of either the logopenic (lvPPA), agrammatic non-fluent (nfvPPA) or semantic (svPPA) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). Patients must have been observed for at least one year by a specialized clinician. 2. Patients must have at least mild to moderate language impairment. 3. Patients must be native English speakers. 4. Patients must have a study partner (e.g. spouse, sibling or adult child) who can accompany them to every study visit.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any history of seizures, unexplained loss of consciousness or a first-degree family member with epilepsy. 2. Any history of significant co-occurring neurological illness unrelated to neurodegeneration associated with PPA (e.g. multiple sclerosis), or significant medical problems (e.g. poorly controlled diabetes/hypertension or cancer within 5 years). 3. Active symptoms of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, substance use disorder or significant premorbid intellectual disability according to Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria. 4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evidence of significant cerebrovascular disease, hydrocephalus or the presence of a space-occupying intra-cranial mass. Contraindications to MRI or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) including: cardiac pacemaker or pacemaker wires, neurostimulators, implanted pumps, metal in the body (rods, plates, screws, shrapnel, dentures, intrauterine device), surgical aneurysm clips in the head, previous neurosurgery or cochlear implants. 5. In line with published Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Institutional Review Board (IRB) guidelines for rTMS, pregnancy must be ruled out by urine ß-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin if answers to screening questions suggest that pregnancy is possible and if female participants are premenopausal and of child-bearing age. Subjects will not be able to enroll if they are breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Language as Measured Through the Boston Naming Test (BNT)Baseline and post-treatmentThe outcome is the Boston Naming Test (BNT), a 30-item naming task scored from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater performance. We report the change between Baseline and after two weeks (Monday-Friday; 10 days total) of TMS stimulation post-treatment (post-treatment minus Baseline).
Changes in Brain Network Connectivity Through a Comparison of the Strength of Resting-state Functional Connectivity MetricBaseline and post treatmentThe outcome is the caudal Middle Frontal Gyrus resting-state functional connectivity z-scores, ranging between 0 (indicating no connectivity) and 1 (indicating strongest connectivity). We report the difference of functional connectivity scores between Baseline and after two weeks (Monday-Friday; 10 days total) of TMS stimulation post-treatment (post-treatment minus Baseline).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active, then Sham rTMS
In this within-subject crossover design, participants first received 2 weeks of active TMS treatment at a personalized intensity determined through a Motor Threshold assessment before the first day of TMS. After a 4 week washout during which no TMS was administered, participants received 2 weeks of sham (placebo) TMS. All participants carry a diagnosis of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA).
8
Sham, then Active rTMS
In this within-subject crossover design, participants first received 2 weeks of sham (placebo) TMS treatment. After a 4 week washout during which no TMS was administered, participants received 2 weeks of active TMS at a personalized intensity determined through a Motor Threshold assessment before the first day of TMS. All participants carry a diagnosis of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA).
2
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham, then Active rTMSActive, then Sham rTMSTotal
Age, Continuous78.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78
70 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66
71.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.39
Boston Naming Test (BNT) score25.50 Items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41
20.06 Items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51
21.15 Items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41
Brain network connectivity0.48 Functional connectivity values
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.034
0.61 Functional connectivity values
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.099
0.59 Functional connectivity values
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.105
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Brain Network Connectivity Through a Comparison of the Strength of Resting-state Functional Connectivity Metric

The outcome is the caudal Middle Frontal Gyrus resting-state functional connectivity z-scores, ranging between 0 (indicating no connectivity) and 1 (indicating strongest connectivity). We report the difference of functional connectivity scores between Baseline and after two weeks (Monday-Friday; 10 days total) of TMS stimulation post-treatment (post-treatment minus Baseline).

Time frame: Baseline and post treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active, then Sham rTMSChanges in Brain Network Connectivity Through a Comparison of the Strength of Resting-state Functional Connectivity MetricActive-0.082 Functional connectivity valuesStandard Deviation 0.12
Active, then Sham rTMSChanges in Brain Network Connectivity Through a Comparison of the Strength of Resting-state Functional Connectivity MetricSham-0.011 Functional connectivity valuesStandard Deviation 0.13
Sham, then Active rTMSChanges in Brain Network Connectivity Through a Comparison of the Strength of Resting-state Functional Connectivity MetricActive-0.27 Functional connectivity valuesStandard Deviation 0.33
Sham, then Active rTMSChanges in Brain Network Connectivity Through a Comparison of the Strength of Resting-state Functional Connectivity MetricSham-0.071 Functional connectivity valuesStandard Deviation 0.04
Primary

Changes in Language as Measured Through the Boston Naming Test (BNT)

The outcome is the Boston Naming Test (BNT), a 30-item naming task scored from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater performance. We report the change between Baseline and after two weeks (Monday-Friday; 10 days total) of TMS stimulation post-treatment (post-treatment minus Baseline).

Time frame: Baseline and post-treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active, then Sham rTMSChanges in Language as Measured Through the Boston Naming Test (BNT)Active1.8 ObjectsStandard Deviation 2.19
Active, then Sham rTMSChanges in Language as Measured Through the Boston Naming Test (BNT)Sham0.063 ObjectsStandard Deviation 2.06
Sham, then Active rTMSChanges in Language as Measured Through the Boston Naming Test (BNT)Active2.5 ObjectsStandard Deviation 0
Sham, then Active rTMSChanges in Language as Measured Through the Boston Naming Test (BNT)Sham0.5 ObjectsStandard Deviation 1.41

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 2, 2026