Skip to content

Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Burn Scar Charateristics

Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Burn Scar Charateristics: A Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04187586
Enrollment
35
Registered
2019-12-05
Start date
2019-12-10
Completion date
2019-12-12
Last updated
2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burn Scar

Keywords

burns, rehabilitation, extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Brief summary

No study has investigated the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on hypertrophic scar characteristics. Thus, this study aimed to ascertain the effects ESWT on burn scars. The investigators retrospectively reviewed burn patients who had undergone autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) with same artificial dermis between January 2012 and September 2019.

Detailed description

No study has investigated the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on hypertrophic scar characteristics. Thus, this study aimed to ascertain the effects ESWT on burn scars. The investigators retrospectively reviewed burn patients who had undergone autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) with same artificial dermis between January 2012 and September 2019. The ESWT group (n=17) received shock waves with low-energy flux density (0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2). The interval between treatments is a 1-week. The ESWT group also received standard treatment. The control group (n=18) only received standard treatment. We reviewed skin characteristics before and after 6 treatment sessions for both groups. The investigators checked skin charateristics(erythema, transepidermal water loss, sebum level, and elasticity). The investigators expect that ESWT is effective for significantly improving burn-associated scar characteristics and may be used for managing burn patients.

Interventions

OTHERExtracorporeal shock wave therapy

ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site at 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density(EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, frequency of 4Hz, and 1000 to 2000 impulses were administered at 1-week intervals for 6 sessions.

Sponsors

Hallym University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

* a retrospective review of 35 patients who had undergone STSG between January 2012 and September 2019 * limited to the upper extremities(the upper arm, forearm, and hand) * the scars which undergone STSG with same artificial dermis using Matriderm® (MeSkin Solution Dr. Suwelack AG, Billerbeck, Germany)

Exclusion criteria

* not evaluated serial assessments * below 18 years age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
scar thickness6 weekshypertrophic scar thickness check using ultrasonic wave equipment (128 BW1 Medison, Korea).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
scar transepidermal water loss(TEWL)6 weeksTEWL measured with a Tewameter® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany), which is used for evaluating water evaporation. The higher values indicating a skin dryness.
scar erythema6 weekspigementation and erythema check using Mexameter® (MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany). The higher values indicating a darker and redder skin.
Sebum6 weeksSebum in the scars was measured with the Sebumeter® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany). The measurement is based on the principle of grease-spot photometry using a cassette with its special tape. A microprocessor calculates the result, which is shown on the display in mg/cm2.
Elasticity6 weeksElasticity was measured using Cutometer SEM 580® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany), which applies negative pressure (450 mbar) on the skin. The numeric values (mm) of the skin's distortion is presented as the elasticity. Two seconds of negative pressure of 450 mbar is followed by 2 s of recess, and this consists of a complete cycle. Three measurement cycles were conducted, and the average values were obtained. The higher values present the higher elasticity.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026