Skip to content

The Effects of a Multimodal Approach for the Treatment of PPA

The Effects of a Multimodal Approach for the Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04187391
Acronym
ACROSS
Enrollment
47
Registered
2019-12-05
Start date
2020-01-15
Completion date
2024-03-31
Last updated
2024-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Progressive Aphasia

Brief summary

Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is an untreatable neurodegenerative disorder that disrupts language functions. Available therapies are mainly symptomatic and recently attention has been gained by new techniques that allow for noninvasive brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether the application of Active tDCS (anode over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex- DLPFC with the cathode over the right supraorbital region) to the scalp during individualized language training, would improve naming abilities in the agrammatic variant of PPA (avPPA) more than use of one methodology alone. The effect of treatment on the clinical symptoms will be related to changes in brain activity (Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI and Functional near-infrared spectroscopy fNIRS) and in biological markers, using a multimodal approach. Finally, we will assess the long-term effects of this approach.

Detailed description

45 patients with avPPA, will be recruited from IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Brescia, Italy and ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Italy . Inclusion criteria will be a diagnosis avPPA according to the current clinical criteria (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011) and a FTD Clinical Dementia Rating score \>0.5 and \<2. Exclusion criteria will be the presence of any medical or psychiatric illness that could interfere in completing assessments and the presence of any medical condition that represents a contraindication to tDCS. All the patients will undergo five consecutive days a week for two weeks of treatment sessions: 15 patients will receive Active tDCS over DLPFC while performing a language training; 15 patients will receive placebo tDCS during language training; 15 patients will receive Active tDCS over DLPFC during unstructured cognitive training. Two trained neuropsychologists will administer the neuropsychological testing in two sessions. At baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1) and 3-months (T2) follow-up assessments were conducted by the same assessor. Blood sample withdrawal at baseline (T0) and after the DLPFC-tDCS intervention (T1) will be assessed. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying tDCS effects, structural imaging, functional connectivity (fMRI) alterations and concentration changes of hemoglobin (fNIRS) will be collected off-line. Each avPPA patient will undergo an MRI scan at the ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Italy at T0 and T1 and a fNIRS acquisition at the IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Brescia, Italy at T0, T1 and T2.

Interventions

DEVICEActive tDCS

Active tDCS anode is applied over the left DLPFC with the cathode over the right supraorbital region.

Placebo tDCS is applied but the current is turned off 10 seconds after the beginning and turned on for the last 10 seconds of the stimulation period.

BEHAVIORALLanguage training

patients receive language training

BEHAVIORALUnstructured cognitive training

patients receive unstructured cognitive training.

Sponsors

Asst Degli Spedali Civili Di Brescia
CollaboratorOTHER
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis avPPA according to the current clinical criteria (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011) * FTD Clinical Dementia Rating (FTD-CDR) score \>0.5 and \<2

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of any medical or psychiatric illness that could interfere in completing assessments * Presence of any medical condition that represents a contraindication to tDCS.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in naming test scores on Picture Naming TaskBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsPicture Naming Task: percentage of correct responses (0-100)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in dementia severity on Frontotemporal Dementia-modified Clinical Dementia Rating ScaleBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsFrontotemporal Dementia-modified Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (0-3; higher scores=greater dementia severity)
Change in cognitive impairment on Mini Mental State ExaminationBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsMini Mental State Examination (0-30; higher scores=better cognitive abilities)
Change in verbal long term memory on Story RecallBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsStory Recall (0-28; higher scores=better memory abilities)
Change in nonverbal long term memory on Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure-RecallBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsRey-Osterrieth Complex Figure-Recall (0-36; higher scores=better abilities)
Change in attentional abilities on Trial Making TestBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsTrial Making Test (milliseconds; higher scores=worse abilities)
Change in constructional praxia on Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure-CopyBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsRey-Osterrieth Complex Figure-Copy (0-36; higher scores=better abilities)
Change in quality of life on Stroke and Aphasia Quality of LifeBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsStroke and Aphasia Quality of Life (0-5; higher scores=better quality of life)
Change in aphasia severity on Screening for Neurodegenerative AphasiaBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsScreening for Neurodegenerative Aphasia Battery (higher scores=better abilities)
Change in naming on naming subtest from Aachener Aphasie TestBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsnaming subtest from Aachener Aphasie Test (0-120; higher scores=better abilities)
Change in language impairment on Mini Language State ExaminationBaseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsMini Language State Examination Battery (higher scores=better abilities)
Change in molecular biomarkers on neurograninBaseline up to 2 weeksneurogranin
Change in imaging biomarkers on fMRI and fNIRSBaseline up to 2 weeksfMRI and fNIRS
Change in fluency abilities on Verbal Fluency (semantic and phonemic)Baseline up to 2 weeks and 3 monthsVerbal Fluency (semantic and phonemic) Test (higher scores=better abilities)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026