Skip to content

Clinical Safety and Scar Prevention Study of a Topical Antifibrotic Compound FS2.

Post-operative Topical Administration of Fibrosis Inhibiting Compound FS2 in a Double-blind, Randomized, Vehicle-controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Prevention of Cutaneous Scarring in Skin Grafts and Donor Sites.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04186273
Acronym
FS2
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-12-04
Start date
2019-12-05
Completion date
2021-03-01
Last updated
2019-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix, Donor Site Complication, Hypertrophic Scar, Keloid, Scar, Skin Graft Complications, Skin Graft Scar

Brief summary

The study will investigate the safety and effectiveness of daily post surgical scar management, using a moisture-balancing base product containing different amounts of a novel (NCE) antifibrogenic compound FS2, a natural metabolite of the kynurenine pathway. Results of recent peer-reviewed, pre-clinical evidence warrant further investigation to validate therapeutic scar preventive efficacy of topically administered/delivered FS2. There are no known safety concerns with current product formulations. Recent Phase I clinical safety and tolerability data further support continuation of the research proposed in this study.

Detailed description

Study Arms (Investigational Conditions): Total of 6, categorized by type of wound and treatment allocation. Description of Study Arms: The quality of tissue repair and scarring will be evaluated in two different, bisected post-surgical sites on the same Participant. Each wound site represents a Study Arm. Each wound site will receive two treatments, one of which is always a vehicle. In total the two wound types provide a total of 6 Study Arms for statistical analysis. Arm 1 / Wound Type 1 (skin grafted wounds: 3-treatment groups): The wound site (injury) that requires skin grafting surgery to remove normal, uninjured skin from the same Participant to cover and repair a deep wound (a skin graft). Arm 2 / Wound Type (donor skin graft harvest site; 3-treatment groups): A surgical wound where a piece of normal skin is removed at uniform depth using a dermatome to harvest a skin graft (skin graft harvest site). The bisected wound site is randomly assigned either a control or FS2 cream treatment. Treatment Groups: Each wound site will be used to investigate and compare three different treatments. Participants will apply the investigated treatments (IP) as directed to allocated bisected sections of the skin grafted wound and donor wound site for 90 days. Follow-on assessments will be conducted with additional study visits on Days 180 and 270 (study endpoint). There are four (4) differently labelled products as follows: Treatment-1 (IP1) A single, daily application of a moisturizing cream-base. Treatment-2 (IP2) A single, daily application of a moisturizing cream-base with FS2 (0.50% w/w). Treatment-3 (IP3) A single, daily application of a moisturizing cream-base with FS2 (0.25% w/w). IP3 will have two different product labels to conceal the identity of the vehicle. Control-cream (IP1), and treatments IP2 and IP3 each containing 0.50%w/w or 0.25%w/w FS2 respectively, will be topically applied to designated treatment sites once per day for a period of 90 days. Investigator and participant will be blinded from both identity of treatment product and randomized location. Each participant will be provided a different cream for each bisected-site for a total of four (4) differently labelled creams; two for the donor site, and two for the skin grafted site. Participants will discuss and be informed/reminded at each visit about study design, responsibilities, possible adverse events, proper daily wound care and cream application methods.

Interventions

DRUGFibrosis-Inhibiting-Compound-FS2

There are three (3) experimental interventions: vehicle moisture balancing base, FS2-0.25 moisturizer, and 0.5 moisturizing base.

OTHERVehicle moisture balancing base

Vehicle base without FS2.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR/ INVESTIGATORS/ SPONSOR/ OUTCOME ASSESSOR/ PATIENT

Intervention model description

QUADRUPLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED, VEHICLE-CONTROLLED STUDY INTRA-SUBJECT CONTROLS

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Medically able to consent to study requirements 2. Adult, male and female trauma patients 3. Ages 18 to 65 years of age 4. Fluent in English (able to consent without a translator) 5. Isolated skin wound of 3% Total Body Surface Area 6. Participant requires partial thickness skin graft (meshed/non-meshed), face and genitalia excluded. 7. Grafted skin is between 100 cm2 and 600 cm2 8. Maximum skin graft expansion ratio is 1:1.5

Exclusion criteria

1. Medically unable to consent to study requirements 2. Require an English translator to lawfully consent to the study and its requirements 3. Treatment sights (skin graft sights) located on the face and genitalia 4. Expected to be medically unstable for the duration of the study period and an additional 1-month thereafter 5. Pregnant, or attempting to become pregnant 6. Known immunosuppression or immunosuppressive illness 7. Subjects who had taken part in a clinical trial within 3 months prior to admission to this trial or who are currently participating in a clinical trial, whether an investigational drug was used or not. 8. Subjects who had any clinical evidence of severe ongoing or prolonged depression or mental illness 9. Subjects who smoke more than 20 cigarettes a day 10. Subjects who demonstrated evidence of drug abuse 11. Any other diagnosis, condition, physical or geographical limitation with the participant that may render, or increases the likelihood of rendering, him/her unable to complete the entire study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)0-9 monthsDifferences in clinical scale scoring of healing, complications and scar severity using Vancouver Scar Scale. Investigator assessment of target scar or keloid using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Scale parameters include: Pigmentation (0-2), Vascularity (0-3), Pliability (0-5), and Height (0-3). Scale measurements include: minimum score of 0 = normal to a maximum score of 2, 3 or 5 depending on the parameter measured.
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)0-9 monthsDifferences in clinical scale scoring of healing, complications and scar severity using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Investigator assessment of target scar or keloid using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Scale parameters include: Vascularity, Pigmentation, Thickness, Relief, Pliability, and Surface Area. Scale measurements include: minimum score of 1 = normal skin to a maximum score of 10 = worst scar imaginable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vital Signs - diastolic blood pressure0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal diastolic blood pressures in participant.
Vital Signs - Heart Rate0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal heart rates in each participant.
Vital Signs - Respiratory Rate0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal respiratory rates in each participant.
Vital Signs - Oral Temperature0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal temperatures in each participant.
Physical Exam Findings0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal physical exam findings in each participant.
Clinical Chemistry Results0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal clinical chemistry results in each participant.
Adverse Events0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of adverse events in each treatment arm.
Urine Analysis Results0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal urine analysis results for each participant.
FS2 Pharmacokinetic urine analysis data0-2 hours; 0-9 monthsTo obtain, evaluate and compare total urine drug concentrations for each participant and compare clearance normalized by estimated volume of distribution (Vd).
FS2 Pharmacokinetic blood analysis data0-2 hours; 0-9 monthsTo obtain, evaluate and compare total blood drug concentrations for each participant and compare clearance normalized by estimated volume of distribution (Vd).
Pain Management0-9monthsPain Visual Analog Scale longitudinal comparison of subjective changes for each participant. Pain, Visual analog scale (score 0-none to 10-worse)
Histology (Tissue Biopsies)3 months and 9 monthsEvaluate and compare pathological assessments of punch biopsies obtained from each treatment site and compare intra site subjective findings (qualitative) for each.
Hematology Results0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal hematology results for each participant.
Vital Signs - systolic blood pressure0-9 monthsTo evaluate and compare Treatment safety by the proportion of abnormal systolic blood pressures in each participant.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactAnthony Papp, MD, PhD
anthony.papp@gmail.com1.778.362.0161
Backup ContactRyan Hartwell, PhD
clinicaltrials@birchbiomed.com1.778.362.5758

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026