Skip to content

Non-interventional Study With NOVOCART® 3D for the Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee in Pediatric Patients

Prospective, Non-interventional Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NOVOCART® 3D for the Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee in Pediatric Patients With Closed Epiphyses

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04186208
Acronym
JUNOVO
Enrollment
42
Registered
2019-12-04
Start date
2017-04-25
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cartilage Disease

Keywords

cartilage defect, knee, pediatric patients

Brief summary

Prospective, multicenter, single-arm non-interventional study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and health economics of NOVOCART 3D in the Treatment fo cartilage defects of the knee in pediatric patients wieh closed epiphyseal growth plates.

Detailed description

The present study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm non-interventional study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and health economics of NOVOCART® 3D in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee in pediatric patients with closed epiphyseal growth plates. In this non-interventional study NOVOCART® 3D, which is marketed in Germany under Paragraph 4b Medicinal Products Act, will be used in routine clinical practice according to the authorized Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). As stated in this SmPC, NOVOCART® 3D may only be used by physicians who are trained on the product. The treatment with NOVOCART® 3D requires two surgeries. During the first surgery cartilage biopsies will be harvested arthroscopically and sent to TETEC AG (Tissue Engineering Technologies AG) for NOVOCART® 3D manufacturing, then NOVOCART® 3D will be transplanted during a second surgery about 3 to 4 weeks later. All patients will be followed up for 5 years post NOVOCART® 3D transplantation and data will be collected at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months as outlined at the end of this synopsis. NOVOCART® 3D post treatment rehabilitation should follow the recommendations given in the SmPC and during product training. The primary and secondary variables (see below) will be assessed after a follow-up of 24 month post NOVOCART® 3D transplantation (primary analysis). Long-term data will be assessed after an additional 3 years follow-up (follow-up analysis). The collected data will be documented using dedicated case report forms (CRFs) which are created and printed by TETEC AG.

Interventions

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

Sponsors

Aesculap AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Winicker Norimed GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Tetec AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 13 - 17 years old * Medicinal indication for NOVOCART 3D treatment

Exclusion criteria

• none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Overall KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score)24 months Follow Up (FU)Change of KOOS defined as the average of the 5 subscale scores (range 0-100, higher values represent a better outcome)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IKDC subjective24 month FUChange of IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) subjective (range 0-100, higher values represent a better outcome)
pain VAS24 month FUChange in pain VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) (range 0-10, higher values represent a better outcome)
MOCART24 month FUIn vivo Performance via MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), MOCART Score (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) (range 0-100, higher values represent a better outcome)
KOOS responder rate24 month FUKOOS responder rate defined as Proportion of patients with \> 10 Points improvement in KOOS
Change of 5 subscores KOOS24 months FUChange of the 5 subscores of KOOS (range 0-100, higher values represent a better outcome)
Proportion of patients with Treatment failures3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 monthsProportion of patients with Treatment failures
Health economics variable (Days of missing work/school ) to NOVOCART 3D treatment3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 monthsDays of missing work/school due to knee pain/function issues in the target knee
Health economics variable (Days of hospitalization ) to NOVOCART 3D treatment3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 monthsDays of hospitalization due to knee pain/function issues in the target knee
Health economics variable (Number of postoperative doctor visits) to NOVOCART 3D treatment3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 monthsNumber of postoperative doctor visits
IKDC subjective responder rate24 months FUIKDC subjective responder rate defined as Proportion of patients with \>20.5 Points improvement in IKDC subjective

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026