Skip to content

Optical Surface Imaging Versus Conventional Photography as a Tool to Document the Surface Geometry of Pectus Excavatum

Optical Surface Imaging Versus Conventional Photography as a Tool to Document the Surface Geometry of Pectus Excavatum

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04185870
Enrollment
19
Registered
2019-12-04
Start date
2019-12-20
Completion date
2020-01-02
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Funnel Chest, Pectus Excavatum

Brief summary

Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital anterior chest wall deformity, known to occur in 1:400 of new-borns. Complaints may be of cosmetic nature or as a consequence of (cardio)pulmonary impairment. Part of the current work-up of pectus excavatum patients in Zuyderland Medical Centre (Heerlen, the Netherlands) is visual documentation of the deformity. Visual documentation is performed utilising a single-reflex camera and consists of 5 standard photographs (acquired from different angles) and two specialised recordings. These specialised recordings encompass a recording to measure the pectus excavatum's depth and a raster stereography recording to create a three-dimensional perspective. However, this form of visual documentation is not efficient, as it is time- and labor-intensive for the photographer and patient. Recently, another study started that aims to investigate whether three-dimensional (3D) optical surface scans can be used to determine pectus severity, as compared to chest radiographs and computed tomography scans (3DPECTUS study; METCZ20190048; NCT03926078). Building on this study it was determined whether 3D optical surface scans can be used as a tool to document the surface geometry of pectus excavatum. To determine whether the current standard photographs and specialised recordings can be replaced by a 3D scan, both methods are compared. To make this comparison, the pectus excavatum depth was chosen as an objective measure of agreement. If there is good agreement, it is assumed that the standard photos can be replaced by a 3D photo in the current work-up. This will subsequently result in a time saving as well as a reduced burden for the patient while acquisition of 3D scans takes only 10 seconds.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST3D scan

All participants will receive a 360 degrees 3D scan of their chest/pectus excavatum.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTStandard photography

All participants will receive a the standard photographs and specialised recordings of the current work-up to document their chest/pectus excavatum.

Sponsors

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants will receive standard photographs and a 3D scan

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All participants of the 3D PECTUS study (METCZ20190048; NCT03926078) that received a 3D scan and standard photographies.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants in which the photography based pectus excavatum depth was measured in the transversal plane.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Standard photography based pectus excavatum depth2 monthsThe pectus excavatum depth is derived from one of the specialized recordings. The depth is obtained by placing a rigid bar with rule over the most excavated part in the transversal plane.
3D scan based pectus excavatum depth2 monthsThe pectus excavatum depth is calculated by slicing the 3D scan in the longitudinal direction. The pectus depth is subsequently calculated from the transversal slice with the most severe excavation.
Absolute agreement between the 3D scan and photography based pectus excavatum depth.2 monthsThe absolute agreement was assessed by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026