Skip to content

Comparison of Two Types of Videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscope in Expected Non-difficult Airway Patients

Comparison of Two Types of Videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscope in Expected Non-difficult Airway Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04185675
Enrollment
300
Registered
2019-12-04
Start date
2019-12-31
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2019-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngoscopes

Keywords

Visual laryngoscope, Direct laryngoscope, Tracheal intubation time

Brief summary

Macintosh direct laryngoscope has been mostly widely used for anesthesiologists in operation rooms or emergency situations all over the world. With rapidly development of technical devices, nowadays videolaryngoscope has become more and more popular in hospitals, for it could improve first intubation success rate and it is easier for beginners to learn. And there are many different types of videolaryngoscope for different purpose, like with or without a channel, different curvature, and so go. In this study, our aim is to study whether the videolaryngoscope which can be adjustable or not costs less intubation time and causes fewer injury in expected non-difficult airway patients by experienced anesthesiologists, compared with the classic Macintosh direct laryngoscope.

Interventions

DEVICEThe laryngoscope used for tracheal intubation under general anesthesia for patients with expected non-difficult airway conditions.

All the patients will receive the same anesthesia induction, and are randomized to three groups to receive different types of laryngoscope for intubation. These are the direct Macintosh laryngoscope, adjustable videolaryngoscope and nonadjustable videolaryngoscope.

Sponsors

Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between18 and 65 years * ASA(American Society of anesthesiologists) I-II * BMI 18-30 kg/m2 * scheduled to receive elective surgery under general anesthesia with expected non-difficult airway in operation rooms.

Exclusion criteria

* expected difficult airway * allergy to anesthesia induction drugs * scheduled to receive surgeries affecting vocalisation * with high reflux aspiration risk * with acute and chronic cardiac or respiratory failure * with glucocorticoids medication history * with mental disorder or transferred to SICU(Surgical Intensive Care Unit) or ICU after surgery who can not cooperate well with others * refused or have participated in other clinical trials that may have effects on the outcomes of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tracheal intubation timetime from the removal of the patient's face mask for preoxygenation to confirmation of good tube position based on continuous positive end-tidal carbon dioxide reading (at least three breaths without a significant visual decrease in capnography).total time to successful orotracheal intubation

Contacts

Primary ContactYanna Pi, Master
piyanna@126.com86 18819186153

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026