Skip to content

Treatment of Acute ACL Injuries in Young Patients Using a Rebound ACL Brace

Treatment of Acute ACL Injuries in Young Patients Using a Rebound ACL Brace

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04185532
Enrollment
44
Registered
2019-12-04
Start date
2020-01-08
Completion date
2024-12-17
Last updated
2024-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

Keywords

ACL, children and adolescents, rebound ACL brace

Brief summary

This study evaluates the use of a brace in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in children and adolescents. Half of the participants will receive a so called rebound ACL brace together with a standardized rehab program supervised by a physiotherapist, while the other half will receive only the standardized rehab program supervised by a physiotherapist

Detailed description

A well known treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the acute phase is a brace which pushes the tibia anteriorly, and the result of the treatment is often successful with healing of the ligament. Similarly, in anterior cruciate ligament injuries, it is suggested that a rebound ACL brace which pushes the tibia posteriorly can facilitate healing of the ACL. It does not have as successful treatment results as the PCL brace, but the type and location of the ACL injury has in previous studies not been well defined. We will, after having described the localisation and type of ACL injury treat the intervention group with the rebound ACL brace and a standardized rehab program and the control group with standardized rehab program alone. The randomization is made blockwise of 4, to treatment A= Brace+physiotherapy or B=Physioterapy. The groups are stratified for gender and age (\<=14 years and \>14 years)

Interventions

OTHERRebound ACL brace and physioterapy

Usage of rebound ACL brace and physioterapy supervised by physioterapist

OTHERPhysioterapy

Physioterapy supervised by physioterapist

Sponsors

Frida Hansson, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The knee laxity measurement with KT-1000 will be performed by an assessor without knowledge of type of intervention. Other outcome measures will not be masked.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* No previous significant knee injury * Trauma followed by hemarthrosis and clinical suspicion of an acute ACL injury * Acute ACL rupture seen on MRI

Exclusion criteria

* Previous ipsilateral knee surgery * Associated injuries which require early surgical intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective knee function6 monthslaxity measurement (KT-1000)
objective knee function6 monthsmuscle strength (measured by Biodex)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective knee function6, 12 and 24 monthsEQ-5D-Y
Activity level6, 12 and 24 monthsPresented as Tegner activity scale. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026