Skip to content

Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Infraclavicular Subomohyoid Block in Shoulder Surgery

Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Infraclavicular Subomohyoid Block in Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Blinded Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04183244
Enrollment
80
Registered
2019-12-03
Start date
2019-08-15
Completion date
2021-02-15
Last updated
2020-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Pain

Keywords

Erector Spinae Plane Block, Infraclavicular Subomohyoid Block, Shoulder Surgery

Brief summary

The study aimed to compare Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block versus infraclavicular subomohyoid (ISO) block in the provision of efficacy of either technique in postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery, aiming to testing the safety of each block in terms of incidence of complications. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups, Group E will receive Erector spinae block and group I will receive infraclavicular subomohyioid block. The local anesthetic solution that will be used in both blocks will be a total volume of 30 mls 0.25%bupivacaine plus 3mg preservative free Dexamethasone. The time between recovery from anesthesia and first pain experienced, as verified by NRS ≥ 3 and first need of a rescue analgesic, will be defined as the duration of analgesia. The total dose of intravenous morphine (the rescue analgesic) used over 24 h postoperatively will be recorded.

Interventions

PROCEDUREErector spinae block

A 5-cm needle prick in the back of the patient 3 cm lateral to mid-line under sterile conditions, with ultrasound guidance.

PROCEDUREInfraclavicular subomohyoid (ISO) block

Under complete aseptic precaution, 12 cm needle will be inserted 2cm superior to the clavicle and advanced retroclavicular, with ultrasound guidance.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, above 18 years old. * ASA physical status I * Scheduled for shoulder surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Morbid obese. * Previous surgery in the same shoulder. * History of psychiatric disorder. * Pulmonary disease. * Contraindication to regional nerve block (e.g. skin infection at the puncture site, coagulopathy). * Allergy to any of medications that will be used

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The block efficacy24 hoursPercentage of 24 hours pain free patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of expected complications ( Block safety)24 hoursThe incidence of expected complications such as phrenic nerve palsy or pneumothorax.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactRanda A Shoukry
randa_shoukry@hotmail.com002 01001404426
Backup ContactMona R Hosny
monamourmar@hotmail.com002 01001540563

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026