Skip to content

Predicting SSRI Efficacy in Veterans With PTSD

An Electrophysiological Predictor of SSRI Response in Veterans With PTSD

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04183205
Acronym
SSRI
Enrollment
19
Registered
2019-12-03
Start date
2019-09-11
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2026-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

Treatment, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI), loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials, Electrophysiology, Depression

Brief summary

This is a research study to examine the effectiveness of a brief screening method that may predict which people with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or depression are most likely to show a positive response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications. Participants will be recruited over approximately 5.25 years, until at least 94 participants complete the 17 week study.

Detailed description

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are prescribed to approximately 60% of Veterans with PTSD treated within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). However, many patients are not responsive to SSRIs. Currently, there is no way to determine whether a particular patient will benefit from an SSRI; treatment is primarily accomplished through 'trial and error' over several weeks or months. The overarching goal of this study is to investigate the pre-treatment usefulness of a simple electrophysiological test for predicting the likelihood of a favorable response to an SSRI. This study will investigate whether a brief pre-treatment auditory event-related potentials procedure \[referred to going forward as "Loudness Dependence of Auditory Evoked Potentials" (LDAEP)\] offers a means for predicting treatment response to an SSRI for men and women diagnosed with PTSD or depression. This study has four aims: 1) To determine the strength of the relationship between LDAEP and clinical response to SSRI treatment. 2) To determine LDAEP cut-off values that would enable clinicians to make individualized SSRI treatment recommendations. 3) To assess the usefulness of change in LDAEP as an objective measure of SSRI response. 4) Exploratory: To determine whether the relationship between LDAEP and clinical response to sertraline differs between men and women. Means to Protect Subjects' Identities: To ensure confidentiality, questionnaire and interview data will be stored in locked filing cabinets within locked offices. Each participant will have his or her own participant number and these numbers will be the only means by which participant information can be identified. Electronic data will be stored on a secure private, password-protected drive that can only be accessed by members of the study team and labeled only with the participant number. One list of names and participant numbers will be kept on a private, password-protected computer account on a separate drive from the de-identified data and accessible only to the study team. ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS IN RESEARCH NOT FUNDED BY NIH Description Of Identification Of Drug: SERTRALINE. Because the goal of this study is to identify pre-treatment predictors of SSRI response that ultimately could be used in routine clinical care, the investigators designed the study with ecological validity in mind. Specifically, the investigators chose sertraline as the study medication because it is: a) the most commonly prescribed SSRI in the US, b) one of only two FDA-approved drugs for treating PTSD, and c) one of the two most effective SSRIs for major depression, a common comorbidity with PTSD. Dosing will follow clinical practice guidelines, i.e., doses will be chosen based on clinical response and tolerability. Description Of Administration Of Drug: The investigators are using an approach , which represents enhanced clinical care in that participants discuss medication levels, side effects, and symptoms with a psychiatrist every two weeks. Study medication and placebo will be stored and distributed by VA Boston Pharmacy service.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLDAEP

This is an ERP task in which participants hear a series of tones ranging from 74dB to 104dB and electrophysiological activity is measured throughout. For each participant average P2 scores are derived for the 74dB tones, 84dB tones, 94dB tones, and 104dB tones. Then, LDAEP is defined as the slope of these average P2 scores.

DRUGPlacebo

placebo pills of the same size, color and taste as the active drug will be administered

DRUGsertraline

Sertraline is an FDA approved SSRI for treatment of PTSD.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED
Middlebury College
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
CollaboratorFED

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will be unaware of whether or not they are on placebo or sertraline at any given moment and the placebo and sertraline capsules look identical. The outcomes assessor is unaware of the study design, study hypotheses, and whether a participant is on placebo or sertraline.

Intervention model description

All eligible participants will first undergo a 2 week placebo lead in. Following this 2 week period, placebo responders will remain on placebo. All other participants will begin a 12 week sertraline trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. has a history of trauma exposure as defined by criterion A of PTSD in the DSM-5 2. meets diagnostic criteria for PTSD, subthreshold PTSD, or MDD as defined by DSM-5 3. study psychiatrist's judgment that SSRIs are an acceptable treatment option for the participant's presenting concerns, and 4. interest in starting a trial of an SSRI

Exclusion criteria

* current or past history of bipolar I disorder, schizophrenic or other psychotic disorders * current organic brain disorder including severe traumatic brain injury, factitious disorder, or malingering * pregnancy * major neurological problems * current moderate or severe substance use disorder * active risk to self or others * evidence of clinically significant hepatic or renal disease or any other acute or unstable medical condition that might interfere with safe conduct of the study * intolerance or hypersensitivity to sertraline * failed past trial of sertraline (confirmed by medical record review) * use of drugs that directly affect the serotonin system (e.g., SNRIs, antipsychotics) within 3 months of the study * use of an SSRI within 3 months of the study. Use of other psychotropic medications must have been stable for 3 months prior to enrollment and remain stable throughout participation * hearing impairment for 780 Hz tones * current enrollment in trauma-focused psychotherapy * for those participants who currently have a non-VA or VA psychiatrist or primary care provider who is willing to prescribe medications, they must be willing to sign a release of information (ROI) for study staff to communicate with their providers and the provider believes that including the participant in the study is potentially appropriate. * As discussed above, the investigators will inform the participant that the investigators will share the following information with their current relevant care provider: * information about the design of the study, inclusion and

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) After 14 Weeks of the Medication Trial Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the PZ Site) and Controlling for Baseline CAPS ScoreCAPS score administered 14 weeks after starting the medication trial, controlling for baseline CAPS scoreThe CAPS-5 is the "gold standard" clinical interview for assessing PTSD. This measure will be used to characterize the sample regarding PTSD diagnosis and as a measure of PTSD severity. Each of the 20 symptoms of PTSD included in DSM-5 is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with a 0 or 1 indicating that the symptom is absent or subthreshold and a score of 2-4 indicating that a symptom has reached the threshold to be included as a symptom and ranges in severity from moderate to extreme. The total range of the CAPS-5 is 0-80, higher scores indicating higher symptom severity.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) After 14 Weeks of the Medication Trial as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the CZ Site) and Controlling for Baseline CAPS ScoreCAPS score administered 14 weeks after starting the medication trial, controlling for baseline CAPS scoreThe CAPS-5 is the "gold standard" clinical interview for assessing PTSD. This measure will be used to characterize the sample regarding PTSD diagnosis and as a measure of PTSD severity. Each of the 20 symptoms of PTSD included in DSM-5 is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with a 0 or 1 indicating that the symptom is absent or subthreshold and a score of 2-4 indicating that a symptom has reached the threshold to be included as a symptom and ranges in severity from moderate to extreme. The total range of the CAPS-5 is 0-80, higher scores indicating higher symptom severity.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) After 14 Weeks of the Medication Trial as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the FZ Site) and Controlling for Baseline CAPS ScoreCAPS score administered 14 weeks after starting the medication trial, controlling for baseline CAPS scoreThe CAPS-5 is the "gold standard" clinical interview for assessing PTSD. This measure will be used to characterize the sample regarding PTSD diagnosis and as a measure of PTSD severity. Each of the 20 symptoms of PTSD included in DSM-5 is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with a 0 or 1 indicating that the symptom is absent or subthreshold and a score of 2-4 indicating that a symptom has reached the threshold to be included as a symptom and ranges in severity from moderate to extreme. The total range of the CAPS-5 is 0-80, higher scores indicating higher symptom severity.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) After 14 Weeks of the Medication Trial Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the PZ Site) and Controlling for Baseline CAPS ScoreCAPS score administered 14 weeks after starting the medication trial, controlling for baseline CAPS scoreThe CAPS-5 is the "gold standard" clinical interview for assessing PTSD. This measure will be used to characterize the sample regarding PTSD diagnosis and as a measure of PTSD severity. Each of the 20 symptoms of PTSD included in DSM-5 is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with a 0 or 1 indicating that the symptom is absent or subthreshold and a score of 2-4 indicating that a symptom has reached the threshold to be included as a symptom and ranges in severity from moderate to extreme. The total range of the CAPS-5 is 0-80, higher scores indicating higher symptom severity.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) After 14 Weeks of the Medication Trial Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the CZ Site) and Controlling for Baseline CAPS ScoreCAPS score administered 14 weeks after starting the medication trial, controlling for baseline CAPS scoreThe CAPS-5 is the "gold standard" clinical interview for assessing PTSD. This measure will be used to characterize the sample regarding PTSD diagnosis and as a measure of PTSD severity. Each of the 20 symptoms of PTSD included in DSM-5 is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with a 0 or 1 indicating that the symptom is absent or subthreshold and a score of 2-4 indicating that a symptom has reached the threshold to be included as a symptom and ranges in severity from moderate to extreme. The total range of the CAPS-5 is 0-80, higher scores indicating higher symptom severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the PZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The QIDS-SR was used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS provides equivalent weightings (0-3) for each symptom item, gives clearly stated anchors that estimate the frequency and severity of symptoms, and includes all items required to diagnose a major depressive episode. The range for the total QIDS-SR severity score is 0-42, with higher scores indicating worse depression severity.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the CZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The QIDS-SR was used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS provides equivalent weightings (0-3) for each symptom item, gives clearly stated anchors that estimate the frequency and severity of symptoms, and includes all items required to diagnose a major depressive episode. The range for the total QIDS-SR severity score is 0-42, with higher scores indicating worse depression severity.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the FZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The QIDS-SR was used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS provides equivalent weightings (0-3) for each symptom item, gives clearly stated anchors that estimate the frequency and severity of symptoms, and includes all items required to diagnose a major depressive episode. The range for the total QIDS-SR severity score is 0-42, with higher scores indicating worse depression severity.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the CZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The QIDS-SR was used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS provides equivalent weightings (0-3) for each symptom item, gives clearly stated anchors that estimate the frequency and severity of symptoms, and includes all items required to diagnose a major depressive episode. The range for the total QIDS-SR severity score is 0-42, with higher scores indicating worse depression severity.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the PZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The QIDS-SR was used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS provides equivalent weightings (0-3) for each symptom item, gives clearly stated anchors that estimate the frequency and severity of symptoms, and includes all items required to diagnose a major depressive episode. The range for the total QIDS-SR severity score is 0-42, with higher scores indicating worse depression severity.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the FZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The PCL-5 is a 20-item measure that assesses DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD, anchored to participants' worst traumatic event. The PCL-5 was administered bi-weekly at each psychiatrist check-in visit. Participants rated how much they experienced each symptom on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = "not at all" to 4 = "extremely") during the past week (total range=0-80). Higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the CZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The PCL-5 is a 20-item measure that assesses DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD, anchored to participants' worst traumatic event. The PCL-5 was administered bi-weekly at each psychiatrist check-in visit. Participants rated how much they experienced each symptom on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = "not at all" to 4 = "extremely") during the past week (total range=0-80). Higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With P200 at the PZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The PCL-5 is a 20-item measure that assesses DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD, anchored to participants' worst traumatic event. The PCL-5 was administered bi-weekly at each psychiatrist check-in visit. Participants rated how much they experienced each symptom on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = "not at all" to 4 = "extremely") during the past week (total range=0-80). Higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the FZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The PCL-5 is a 20-item measure that assesses DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD, anchored to participants' worst traumatic event. The PCL-5 was administered bi-weekly at each psychiatrist check-in visit. Participants rated how much they experienced each symptom on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = "not at all" to 4 = "extremely") during the past week (total range=0-80). Higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the CZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The PCL-5 is a 20-item measure that assesses DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD, anchored to participants' worst traumatic event. The PCL-5 was administered bi-weekly at each psychiatrist check-in visit. Participants rated how much they experienced each symptom on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = "not at all" to 4 = "extremely") during the past week (total range=0-80). Higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as Predicted by Pretreatment LDAEP Slope (Calculated With N100 at the PZ Site)Administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14The PCL-5 is a 20-item measure that assesses DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD, anchored to participants' worst traumatic event. The PCL-5 was administered bi-weekly at each psychiatrist check-in visit. Participants rated how much they experienced each symptom on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = "not at all" to 4 = "extremely") during the past week (total range=0-80). Higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSuzanne Pineles, PhD

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There was no preassignment to group. All participants first completed a two week placebo lead-in phase. After the placebo lead-in phase, participants who made meaningful symptomatic reduction on the placebo (operationalized as more than 50% improvement on the PCL and QIDS-SR) during the placebo lead in phase remained on placebo for the duration of the trial. All other participants began the sertraline phase.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Boston site
18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Charleston site
1 Participants
Self-reported depression symptom severity12.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.01
Self-reported PTSD symptom severity38.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 00 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 190 / 09 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 00 / 16

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 18, 2026